Mutual Release (Kenya)
MUTUAL RELEASE
Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 | Limitation of Actions Act Cap. 22
THIS MUTUAL RELEASE is made on [Release Date]
BETWEEN:
(1) [Party One Name] (ID/BRS: [Party One ID/BRS]), of [Party One Address] ("Party One"); and
(2) [Party Two Name] (ID/BRS: [Party Two ID/BRS]), of [Party Two Address] ("Party Two").
Party One and Party Two are together referred to as the "Parties".
RECITALS
A. The Parties have previously been engaged in the following relationship or transaction: [Background Description].
B. The Parties have agreed to release each other from all or specified claims arising from that relationship on the terms set out in this Mutual Release.
1. MUTUAL RELEASE
1.1 Scope of Release: [Release Scope].
1.2 Specific claims released (where applicable): [Specific Claims Description].
1.3 In consideration of the mutual releases set out in this agreement, and subject to Clause 1.4 below, each Party hereby irrevocably and unconditionally releases, discharges, and acquits the other Party, and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, successors, and assigns, from all actions, proceedings, claims, demands, liabilities, costs, and expenses — whether known or unknown, whether in existence now or arising in the future from the matters described in the Recitals — that each Party has or may have against the other Party arising from the matters described in this Mutual Release.
1.4 The following claims are expressly excluded from this Mutual Release: [Excluded Claims].
1.5 Each Party covenants that it will not commence, maintain, or threaten any legal proceedings — whether before the High Court of Kenya, the Magistrates Court, the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC), any arbitral tribunal, or any other forum — in respect of the claims released under Clause 1.3.
2. CONSIDERATION
2.1 Consideration type: [Consideration Type].
2.2 Settlement payment amount (if applicable): [Settlement Amount], to be paid by [Paying Party] to the other Party by [Payment Deadline].
2.3 Each Party acknowledges that the consideration provided is adequate and sufficient, and that this Mutual Release is a binding contract under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
3.1 Each Party warrants to the other that: (a) it has full legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform this Mutual Release; (b) it has not assigned, transferred, or encumbered any of the claims released herein to any third party; and (c) it has obtained all necessary internal authorisations (including board resolutions where applicable) to execute this Mutual Release.
3.2 Each Party warrants that it entered into this Mutual Release freely and voluntarily, without duress, undue influence, or misrepresentation, and with the benefit of legal advice or the opportunity to obtain such advice.
4. CONFIDENTIALITY
4.1 Confidentiality required: [Confidentiality Required].
4.2 Where confidentiality is required, each Party agrees to keep the existence, terms, and circumstances of this Mutual Release strictly confidential and not to disclose them to any third party without the prior written consent of the other Party, except as required by law, court order, or applicable regulatory authority.
5. GOVERNING LAW AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
5.1 This Mutual Release is governed by the laws of Kenya, including the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Limitation of Actions Act Cap. 22.
5.2 Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Mutual Release shall be resolved by: [Dispute Resolution], in [Governing County].
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Mutual Release on the date first written above.
Party One
________________
Signature
Party Two
________________
Signature
Witness
________________
Signature
What Is a Mutual Release (Kenya)?
A Mutual Release in Kenya waives defined claims, preventing the releasing party from pursuing them later. It records the rental price, deposit, term, maintenance duties, and notice periods between landlord and tenant.
The legal basis for a mutual release in Kenya derives from the law of discharge of contracts under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the common law principles of accord and satisfaction. Section 62 of the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 recognises that the parties to a contract may agree to alter or extinguish their obligations by a new agreement — which is itself a binding contract requiring fresh consideration. In a mutual release, the consideration provided by each party is the release they give to the other: each party's promise to release the other is consideration for the counterparty's reciprocal promise. This mutual exchange of promises satisfies the consideration requirement under Section 2 of Cap. 23, making the mutual release enforceable without the need for any additional monetary payment.
Where a mutual release is intended to be enforceable as a deed — for example, to overcome potential arguments about adequacy of consideration or to take advantage of the longer limitation period applicable to deeds under the Limitation of Actions Act Cap. 22 — the document may be executed as a deed under Kenyan law. Execution as a deed requires signature by the party (and, in the case of a company, by authorised signatories under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015), attestation by a witness, and delivery of the deed. Deeds executed in Kenya are subject to stamp duty under the Stamp Duty Act Cap. 480 at the rate applicable to the subject matter of the release.
A mutual release differs from a settlement agreement, a novation agreement, and a deed of waiver, though these instruments are often confused in Kenyan commercial practice. A settlement agreement resolves a specific dispute and typically involves a payment — the settlement sum — in exchange for the release. A novation agreement replaces an existing contract with a new one. A deed of waiver is typically unilateral — one party waives a specific right. A mutual release, by contrast, extinguishes reciprocal claims without necessarily involving any monetary payment, and operates as a final discharge of the relationship between the parties.
In the employment context, mutual releases are commonly executed between employers and employees at the conclusion of a negotiated separation. The Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC), which has exclusive jurisdiction over employment disputes under Article 162 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, has held that a mutual release executed by an employee is binding provided it was freely and voluntarily entered into with full knowledge of the rights being released, without duress, misrepresentation, or undue influence. The ELRC will scrutinise releases that purport to waive statutory rights under the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 — such as the right to terminal dues, leave pay, and severance pay — and may decline to enforce them if the employee was not independently advised.
The High Court of Kenya and the Court of Appeal have affirmed that clear and unambiguous mutual release language is effective to bar subsequent claims arising from the matters covered, and that general release clauses covering all claims are enforceable where the parties had legal capacity, adequate consideration, and a genuine intention to achieve a final settlement.
When Do You Need a Mutual Release (Kenya)?
A Mutual Release in Kenya is required or strongly advisable in a number of commercial, employment, and personal legal situations arising under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
A mutual release is needed when two commercial parties have concluded, terminated, or allowed a contract to expire and wish to confirm that neither party has any outstanding claims against the other. This is particularly important where the contractual relationship involved ongoing obligations, warranties, or indemnities that might otherwise survive termination and remain enforceable for up to six years under the Limitation of Actions Act Cap. 22.
A mutual release is required when a commercial dispute between two businesses has been resolved through negotiation, mediation at the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) Mediation Centre, or arbitration proceedings, and the parties wish to document their mutual discharge as part of the settlement. Without a written mutual release, either party may seek to revive claims arising from the same dispute, or argue that the settlement was incomplete.
A mutual release is needed when an employment relationship is ending by mutual agreement and the employer and employee wish to avoid future litigation before the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC). The release should cover all statutory and contractual claims the employee may have, and should be executed after the employee has received all terminal dues — including salary in lieu of notice, accrued annual leave pay under Section 28 of the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007, and any agreed gratuity or severance pay.
A mutual release is needed when two business partners are dissolving a partnership under the Partnership Act Cap. 29 and wish to release each other from liabilities incurred during the partnership. The release should specify the debts and obligations included and excluded from its scope, and should address the treatment of third-party creditors.
A mutual release is required when parties to a lease — landlord and tenant — have agreed early termination of the tenancy and wish to confirm that neither party has any outstanding claims for rent arrears, dilapidations, or other lease obligations.
Parties in Kenya should prepare a Mutual Release (Kenya) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015, the Registrar of Companies at the Office of the Attorney General maintains the register of Kenyan companies. Section 3 of the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) governs contractual obligations. The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) enforces the Competition Act No. 12 of 2010. The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) administers corporate tax under the Income Tax Act (Cap. 470). The High Court of Kenya has unlimited original jurisdiction under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Mutual Release (Kenya)
A valid and enforceable Mutual Release under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 in Kenya must include the following essential elements.
Parties: Full legal names, National Identity Card numbers or Business Registration Service (BRS) registration numbers, and addresses of both releasing parties. Where a party is a company incorporated under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015, the company's PIN registered with the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) and its registered office address must be stated. Both parties must have full legal capacity to contract under Section 11 of the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
Recitals: A brief and accurate description of the background relationship — the contract, transaction, or incident from which the released claims arise — and the commercial reason for executing the mutual release. The recitals contextualise the scope of the release and help a Kenyan court interpret any ambiguity in the operative provisions.
Scope of Release: A clear and thorough statement of the claims, demands, liabilities, causes of action, and rights being mutually released. The scope may be general (releasing all claims of any nature) or specific (releasing only claims arising from a named contract or incident). Kenyan courts will enforce a general release clause where the parties had independent legal advice and the language is unambiguous. Claims excluded from the scope of the release — such as fraud, criminal liability, or claims not yet known at the date of the release — must be expressly carved out.
Consideration: A statement of the consideration provided by each party, which in a pure mutual release is typically the mutual exchange of releases. Where monetary consideration is paid by one party — for example, a settlement sum — the amount and payment terms must be stated. Consideration must be present under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 for the mutual release to be enforceable as a contract, unless the document is executed as a deed.
Representations: Warranties by each party that they have not assigned or transferred the released claims to any third party, and that they have the authority to grant the release on behalf of themselves and their successors, assigns, heirs, and legal representatives. This prevents a third party to whom a claim has been assigned from subsequently suing despite the mutual release.
Covenants Not to Sue: An express covenant by each party not to commence, continue, or threaten any legal proceedings — whether before the High Court of Kenya, the Magistrates Court, the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC), arbitration, or any other forum — in respect of the released claims. This reinforces the release by creating an independent contractual bar to proceedings.
Confidentiality: A confidentiality obligation covering the existence, terms, and circumstances of the mutual release, which is commonly included in commercial and employment releases to protect the commercial reputation of both parties and preserve the agreed settlement from public disclosure.
Governing Law and Dispute Resolution: A statement that the mutual release is governed by the laws of Kenya, and that disputes about the interpretation or enforcement of the release shall be resolved before the High Court of Kenya under the Civil Procedure Act Cap. 21, or by arbitration before the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA).
Signature and Attestation: Each party must sign the mutual release before a witness, Commissioner for Oaths, or Advocate of the High Court of Kenya. Where execution as a deed is intended, the signature must be accompanied by appropriate attestation language and delivery.
Forms-legal.com provides this Kenya Mutual Release template as a starting point. Parties releasing significant financial or employment claims should obtain independent legal advice from an advocate admitted to the Roll of Advocates maintained by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) before executing the document.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Mutual Release (Kenya) (Kenya) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/mutual-release-kenya
"Mutual Release (Kenya) (Kenya)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/mutual-release-kenya.
@misc{formslegal-mutual-release-kenya,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Mutual Release (Kenya) (Kenya)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/mutual-release-kenya}},
note = {Free legal document template}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Yes — a mutual release can be legally binding in Kenya without any monetary payment, provided it satisfies the requirements for a valid contract under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23. The key requirement is consideration: each party must provide something of value to the other. In a mutual release, the consideration is reciprocal — each party's promise to release the other constitutes valid consideration for the other party's corresponding promise of release. This mutual exchange of promises satisfies the consideration requirement under Section 2 of Cap. 23 and makes the mutual release a binding contract, even in the complete absence of money. Kenyan courts have consistently upheld mutual releases on this basis. The Law of Contract Act does not require consideration to be adequate — only that it must be real, legal, and not past. However, where there is a significant imbalance in the value of the releases given by each party — for example, where one party releases a large monetary claim in exchange for a trivial concession — a Kenyan court may scrutinise the adequacy of consideration more closely in conjunction with principles of unconscionability. Where parties wish to avoid any consideration argument altogether, the mutual release can be executed as a deed under Kenyan law, in which case consideration is not required for the deed to be enforceable.
A mutual release in Kenya can, in principle, extend to unknown or future claims — but the drafting must be express and unambiguous for such a broad release to be enforced by Kenyan courts. The High Court of Kenya has applied the principle that general release clauses are construed against the party seeking to rely on them (the contra proferentem rule), meaning that any ambiguity about whether unknown claims are included will be resolved against the relying party. For a release to cover claims that the parties do not know about at the date of the release, the document must contain explicit language to that effect — for example: 'each party releases the other from all claims, whether known or unknown, whether contingent or certain, whether now existing or arising in the future from the matters described herein.' Even with such language, Kenyan courts may decline to enforce a release of future statutory claims — for example, claims for personal injury arising under the Work Injury Benefits Act No. 13 of 2007 (WIBA), or statutory employment claims under the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 — on public policy grounds. Claims for fraud, wilful misconduct, and criminal liability are generally not releasable under Kenyan law regardless of the release language. Parties should obtain advice from an advocate admitted to the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) before relying on a mutual release to extinguish uncertain or future claims of significant value.
A mutual release and a settlement agreement serve overlapping but distinct purposes under Kenyan law. A settlement agreement is the broader document by which two parties resolve a dispute and record the terms of their settlement — typically including the settlement sum, payment schedule, confidentiality obligations, and any ongoing covenants. A mutual release is the operative discharge instrument within or accompanying a settlement agreement, by which each party formally releases their claims against the other. In practice, many Kenyan commercial settlement agreements incorporate a mutual release clause within the agreement itself, rather than executing a separate release document. However, a standalone mutual release is preferred where: the parties have already performed their obligations under a settlement agreement and wish to record a final discharge; the relationship is being ended without any financial payment (for example, a commercial partnership dissolution); or the parties wish to create a clean, simple instrument that is easily produced to a Kenyan court as proof of discharge. Under the Civil Procedure Act Cap. 21 and the Judicature Act Cap. 8, a duly executed mutual release is admissible before the High Court of Kenya as conclusive evidence that the releasing party has discharged their right of action in respect of the covered matters. A consent order recording a settlement agreement has the additional status of a court order, which can be enforced by execution proceedings without commencing fresh litigation.
The enforceability of a mutual release by an employee purporting to waive statutory employment rights is subject to careful scrutiny by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) in Kenya. The ELRC has exclusive jurisdiction over employment disputes under Article 162 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act No. 20 of 2011. The ELRC has developed a body of case law establishing that while employees may validly release contractual claims — such as claims for bonuses, commissions, or enhanced severance pay agreed under a contract of employment — statutory minimum rights under the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 cannot be contractually waived below the statutory floor. Specifically, the ELRC has held that an employee cannot validly release their claim to: notice pay or pay in lieu of notice at the statutory minimum under Section 35 of the Employment Act; accrued but untaken annual leave pay under Section 28; and severance pay at the statutory rate of 15 days' basic wages per completed year of service under Section 40 for employees made redundant. However, where an employee has received all statutory entitlements in full and is releasing additional contractual claims — such as claims for alleged unfair dismissal damages beyond the statutory minimum — the ELRC will generally enforce a clearly worded release executed freely by an employee with capacity and, ideally, with the benefit of independent legal advice.
The stamping and attestation requirements for a mutual release in Kenya depend on the nature of the document and the subject matter of the claims released. Under the Stamp Duty Act Cap. 480, instruments that fall within the categories listed in the Schedule to the Act — including agreements, bonds, and deeds — attract stamp duty. A mutual release that is executed as a simple contract (not a deed) and does not involve the transfer of any property, shares, or other dutiable asset generally does not attract stamp duty as a standalone instrument. However, where the mutual release accompanies a settlement involving a payment of money — or where it is part of a transaction involving property such as land or shares — stamp duty on the settlement sum or the property value may be payable to the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA). A mutual release does not need to be formally notarised in Kenya for domestic transactions. However, where the mutual release is to be used or enforced in a foreign jurisdiction, it may need to be notarised and apostilled under the Hague Convention on Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents — Kenya acceded to the Apostille Convention in 2022. Attestation by a Commissioner for Oaths under the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act Cap. 15 or by an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya is standard practice for important legal documents and provides evidence of due execution if the release is challenged before a Kenyan court.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Debt Settlement Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Debt Settlement Agreement resolving an outstanding debt on agreed terms, compliant with the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Limitation of Actions Act Cap. 22.
Deed of Novation (Kenya)
A Kenya Deed of Novation transferring all rights and obligations under an existing contract from an outgoing party to an incoming party, governed by the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) and executed as a deed.
Confidentiality Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Confidentiality Agreement (mutual or one-way) protecting trade secrets, business information, and personal data, compliant with the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019.
Demand Letter — Breach of Contract (Kenya)
A Kenya Demand Letter for breach of contract demanding remedy or compensation under the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23), suitable for commercial disputes before the High Court of Kenya or Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA).
Mediation Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Mediation Agreement formalising the appointment of a mediator and the terms of mediation under the Mediation Act No. 9 of 2012 and the Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21).