Arbitration Clause (Kenya)
ARBITRATION CLAUSE
For insertion in: [Contract Name] dated [Contract Date]
Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 (Revised 2022) | New York Convention 1958
This Arbitration Clause forms part of the [Contract Name] entered into between [Party 1 Name] (BRS/KRA: [Party 1 BRS Or PIN]) and [Party 2 Name] (BRS/KRA: [Party 2 BRS Or PIN]) dated [Contract Date].
DISPUTE RESOLUTION — ARBITRATION
1. Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or in connection with this Contract — including any question regarding its existence, validity, breach, or termination — shall be referred to and finally resolved by binding arbitration, in accordance with the provisions set out below.
2. Pre-Arbitration Step (if applicable): Before commencing arbitration, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through good faith negotiations for a period of [Pre Arbitration Step]. If the dispute is not resolved within that period, either Party may commence arbitration by filing a Request for Arbitration under the applicable rules.
3. Rules: The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the [Arbitration Institution], which Rules are incorporated by reference into this clause.
4. Seat: The seat (legal place) of arbitration shall be [Seat Of Arbitration]. The Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 of Kenya (as amended) shall govern the arbitration proceedings. The High Court of Kenya (Commercial Division) shall have supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Act.
5. Tribunal: The arbitral tribunal shall consist of [Number Of Arbitrators], appointed in accordance with the [Arbitration Institution]. Where the Parties fail to agree on the appointment within 30 days, the appointing authority designated in the applicable rules — or, failing that, the High Court of Kenya under Section 12 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 — shall make the appointment.
6. Language: The language of the arbitration proceedings and the arbitral award shall be [Arbitration Language].
7. Governing Law: The substantive law applicable to the dispute shall be [Governing Law].
8. Interim Relief: Nothing in this clause shall prevent either Party from seeking urgent interim relief from the High Court of Kenya under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995, pending the constitution of the arbitral tribunal.
9. Separability: This Arbitration Clause shall be treated as an agreement separate from the remainder of this Contract, pursuant to Section 17 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995. Any challenge to the validity or termination of this Contract shall not affect the validity of this Arbitration Clause.
10. Final and Binding: The arbitral award shall be final and binding on the Parties and shall be enforceable under Section 35 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) 1958, to which Kenya is a signatory.
11. Confidentiality: All arbitration proceedings, submissions, evidence, and awards under this clause shall be confidential.
AGREED by the Parties as part of [Contract Name] dated [Contract Date].
Authorised Signatory (Party 1)
________________
Signature
Authorised Signatory (Party 2)
________________
Signature
What Is a Arbitration Clause (Kenya)?
An Arbitration Clause in Kenya sets out the arbitration clause and the obligations it places on the parties.
Section 3 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 defines an arbitration agreement as including an arbitration clause within a contract, confirming that an embedded clause has the same legal force as a standalone Arbitration Agreement. Section 4 requires the arbitration agreement to be in writing — whether contained in the signed contract document, in a separately signed schedule, or in an exchange of electronic communications that provides a written record. An Arbitration Clause that meets the Section 3 and Section 4 requirements is enforceable under Section 6 of the Act, which obliges the High Court of Kenya to stay court proceedings and refer parties to arbitration where a valid clause exists.
The separability doctrine — codified in Section 17 of the Arbitration Act — provides that an Arbitration Clause is treated as a legally separate agreement from the main contract in which it is embedded. A challenge to the validity, existence, or termination of the main contract does not automatically render the Arbitration Clause ineffective. The arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction under the kompetenz-kompetenz principle to rule on challenges to its own jurisdiction, including challenges to the validity of the Arbitration Clause, subject to review by the High Court of Kenya (Commercial Division).
The Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA), established under the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration Act No. 26 of 2013, provides institutional arbitration administration for Kenyan commercial disputes. An Arbitration Clause that designates the NCIA as the administering institution and incorporates the NCIA Arbitration Rules 2015 by reference is the standard recommended approach for commercial contracts in Kenya above KES 10,000,000 in value. For smaller commercial transactions, an ad hoc Arbitration Clause under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules is a cost-effective alternative.
Kenya is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (acceded 1989), meaning arbitral awards issued pursuant to valid Kenyan Arbitration Clauses are enforceable in 172 Convention member states worldwide. Arbitral awards rendered under a Kenyan Arbitration Clause are enforced by the High Court of Kenya under Sections 35 and 36 of the Arbitration Act as if they were decrees of the court.
The legal framework governing the Arbitration Clause (Kenya) in Kenya draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015, the Registrar of Companies at the Office of the Attorney General maintains the register of Kenyan companies. Section 3 of the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) governs contractual obligations. The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) enforces the Competition Act No. 12 of 2010. The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) administers corporate tax under the Income Tax Act (Cap. 470). The High Court of Kenya has unlimited original jurisdiction under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Parties executing a Arbitration Clause (Kenya) in Kenya should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 (revised 2022) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Arbitration Clause (Kenya)?
An Arbitration Clause in Kenya is needed in a wide range of commercial contracts to provide parties with a binding, private, and expert dispute resolution mechanism as an alternative to High Court litigation.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in every substantial commercial contract between Kenyan businesses — supply agreements, distribution agreements, IT services agreements, master service agreements — where the parties prefer confidential resolution of disputes by a technically qualified arbitrator rather than public court proceedings before the High Court (Commercial Division) in Nairobi, which can take 3 to 7 years for complex commercial cases.
An Arbitration Clause is required in construction and infrastructure contracts — particularly those governed by the Kenya Institute of Architects (KIA) standard form or the FIDIC suite of contracts commonly used by KENHA (Kenya National Highways Authority), KURA (Kenya Urban Roads Authority), and KeRRA (Kenya Rural Roads Authority) — where technical disputes about workmanship, variations, and delay claims require resolution by an arbitrator with construction expertise.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in shareholder agreements and joint venture agreements under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015 for companies registered with the Business Registration Service (BRS), where the parties wish to resolve shareholder disputes — disagreements about dividend policy, director appointments, share valuation, and drag-along or tag-along rights — confidentially through arbitration rather than through a public oppression petition before the High Court.
An Arbitration Clause is required in commercial lease agreements under the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap. 301) for high-value commercial premises, where landlord-tenant disputes about rent review, dilapidations, and lease renewal would benefit from specialist arbitration rather than contested Rent Tribunal proceedings.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in banking and trade finance agreements — loan agreements, security instruments, and letters of credit governed by the Bills of Exchange Act (Cap. 27) — where CBK-regulated lenders prefer arbitration's confidentiality and finality over public High Court proceedings that could affect the lender's reputation and borrower relationships.
Parties in Kenya should prepare a Arbitration Clause (Kenya) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015, the Registrar of Companies at the Office of the Attorney General maintains the register of Kenyan companies. Section 3 of the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) governs contractual obligations. The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) enforces the Competition Act No. 12 of 2010. The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) administers corporate tax under the Income Tax Act (Cap. 470). The High Court of Kenya has unlimited original jurisdiction under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Arbitration Clause (Kenya)
A well-drafted Arbitration Clause in Kenya under the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 must contain the following essential components to be enforceable and to function effectively as a dispute resolution mechanism.
Dispute Scope: A clear statement of which disputes are covered — whether all disputes arising from or in connection with the contract (the broadest formulation, recommended by NCIA), or only specified categories of disputes. The Arbitration Act and NCIA practice confirm that broad scope language reduces the risk of satellite court proceedings about whether a particular dispute falls within the arbitration clause.
Arbitration Institution or Rules: Designation of the governing rules — either institutional (NCIA Arbitration Rules 2015 for Nairobi-seated commercial arbitrations, ICC Rules for international disputes, or UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules for ad hoc proceedings) or, for smaller disputes, reference to arbitration under the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 without institutional administration. The NCIA is the preferred institution for disputes involving Kenyan parties or Kenyan law.
Seat of Arbitration: Specification of the legal seat — typically Nairobi, Kenya — which determines the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court of Kenya and confirms that the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 governs the proceedings. The seat should be distinguished from the physical venue of hearings, which may vary.
Number of Arbitrators: Whether the tribunal consists of a sole arbitrator (cost-effective for disputes up to KES 50,000,000) or three arbitrators (appropriate for larger or more complex disputes). The NCIA Arbitration Rules provide a default mechanism for appointing arbitrators where the parties cannot agree.
Language: The language of proceedings — English is standard for Kenya commercial arbitrations and aligns with the official language of the contract.
Governing Law: The substantive law applicable to the dispute — typically the laws of Kenya, including the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) and any sector-specific statute. The Arbitration Clause should specify governing law even where the main contract already contains a governing law clause, to avoid ambiguity.
Emergency and Interim Relief: Whether emergency arbitrator provisions apply (available under NCIA Rules) and whether parties reserve the right to seek interim relief from the High Court of Kenya under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act pending constitution of the arbitral tribunal — a critical protection for parties needing urgent asset preservation orders.
The forms-legal.com Arbitration Clause template for Kenya provides both institutional (NCIA) and ad hoc (UNCITRAL) versions, covering the full range of commercial contract types from KES 500,000 small business disputes to multi-billion shilling infrastructure and energy projects, with compliance guidance on the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 mandatory requirements.
Additional compliance elements for a Arbitration Clause (Kenya) used in Kenya include: Under the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015, the Registrar of Companies at the Office of the Attorney General maintains the register of Kenyan companies. Section 3 of the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) governs contractual obligations. The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) enforces the Competition Act No. 12 of 2010. The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) administers corporate tax under the Income Tax Act (Cap. 470). The High Court of Kenya has unlimited original jurisdiction under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Kenya-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Arbitration Clause (Kenya) (Kenya) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-kenya
"Arbitration Clause (Kenya) (Kenya)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-kenya.
@misc{formslegal-arbitration-clause-kenya,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Arbitration Clause (Kenya) (Kenya)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/kenya/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-kenya}},
note = {Free legal document template}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. An Arbitration Clause that complies with Sections 3 and 4 of the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 — in writing, identifying the scope of disputes and satisfying basic contract formation requirements under the Law of Contract Act (Cap. 23) — is enforceable in Kenya. Section 6 of the Arbitration Act requires the High Court to stay court proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration where a valid Arbitration Clause exists and one party applies for a stay before taking any step in the court proceedings. The High Court of Kenya (Commercial Division) has consistently upheld Arbitration Clauses — in decisions including Ann Gitau v Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd [2019] eKLR and Econet Wireless Kenya Ltd v Minister for Information [2005] eKLR — confirming that a valid clause ousts the court's jurisdiction to determine the substance of the dispute, leaving only supervisory functions (arbitrator appointment, interim relief, award enforcement) to the courts.
Institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitration are the two principal forms of commercial arbitration available in Kenya under the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995. In institutional arbitration, the parties designate an arbitration institution — most commonly the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) under the NCIA Arbitration Rules 2015, or the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) for international disputes — to administer the proceedings. The institution appoints arbitrators, fixes and collects fees, ensures compliance with its procedural rules, and provides administrative support. Institutional arbitration provides procedural predictability and reduces the risk of stalled proceedings. In ad hoc arbitration, the parties themselves (or the arbitral tribunal) manage all procedural aspects without institutional oversight, often using the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as a procedural framework. Ad hoc arbitration is more flexible and generally less expensive for smaller disputes but requires the parties to cooperate in procedural matters. For disputes above KES 10,000,000 or involving a foreign party, institutional arbitration under NCIA Rules is the recommended approach.
A valid Arbitration Clause in Kenya excludes the jurisdiction of the Kenyan courts to determine the merits of disputes covered by the clause, but does not eliminate the courts' supervisory role over the arbitration process. The High Court of Kenya retains jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 to: appoint arbitrators where the agreed appointment mechanism fails (Section 12); grant interim relief in support of arbitration proceedings, including asset preservation orders, injunctions, and orders for evidence preservation (Section 7); determine challenges to an arbitrator for lack of impartiality or qualification (Section 14); and enforce or set aside arbitral awards under Sections 35 and 36. The constitutional right of access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 means that courts retain oversight of arbitration to prevent fundamental unfairness. Parties cannot contract out of the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court — any Arbitration Clause purporting to do so is invalid on public policy grounds under Section 35(2)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act.
The Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995, Section 4, requires only that an arbitration agreement — including a clause — be in writing. The Act does not prescribe a specific format, wording, or length. However, a poorly drafted Arbitration Clause — one that is silent on the seat, the number of arbitrators, or the applicable rules — creates uncertainty and scope for satellite litigation about the meaning of the clause before the High Court. NCIA's recommended model clause for contracts governed by Kenyan law provides: 'Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity, or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) Arbitration Rules, which Rules are deemed to be incorporated by reference into this clause. The seat of arbitration shall be Nairobi, Kenya. The tribunal shall consist of [one / three] arbitrator(s). The language of the arbitration shall be English.' This formulation satisfies all requirements of the Arbitration Act and provides procedural clarity.
Not all disputes are arbitrable in Kenya. The Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 and Kenyan courts have identified certain categories of disputes that cannot be submitted to arbitration because of their public interest nature or because specific legislation vests exclusive jurisdiction in a particular court or tribunal. Non-arbitrable disputes in Kenya include: criminal matters (no private arbitration of criminal liability); employment disputes governed by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) under Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution — the ELRC has exclusive statutory jurisdiction and parties cannot contract out of it; land disputes that require registration of title at the Lands Registry, which can only be effected by court order from the Environment and Land Court (ELC); matrimonial and family law matters including divorce, custody, and adoption governed by the Marriage Act No. 4 of 2014 and the Children Act No. 29 of 2022; insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency Act No. 18 of 2015; and disputes requiring a judicial remedy that only a court can grant, such as criminal penalties, committal to prison for contempt, or declarations of unconstitutionality. All other commercial disputes between consenting parties are arbitrable under the Arbitration Act.
Arbitration under the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) Arbitration Rules 2015 typically takes 6 to 18 months from the filing of the Request for Arbitration to the issuance of a final award for commercial disputes in the KES 10,000,000 to KES 500,000,000 range, depending on the complexity of the dispute, the number of parties, and the availability of witnesses and experts. Expedited arbitration procedures under NCIA Rules are available for smaller or less complex disputes and can produce a final award within 3 to 6 months. By comparison, contested commercial litigation before the High Court (Commercial Division) in Nairobi typically takes 3 to 7 years from filing to final judgment at first instance, with further delays on appeal to the Court of Appeal and, in some cases, to the Supreme Court of Kenya. The Judiciary's Case Audit and Institutional Transformation (CAJIT) programme has improved commercial court timelines, but arbitration remains significantly faster for most commercial disputes. The finality of arbitral awards — which can only be challenged on limited grounds under Section 35 of the Arbitration Act — also reduces post-award litigation compared to court judgments that may be appealed through multiple levels of the Kenyan court hierarchy.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Arbitration Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Arbitration Agreement submitting an existing or future dispute to binding arbitration, compliant with the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995 (revised 2022), enforceable under the New York Convention 1958.
NCIA Arbitration Submission (Kenya)
A Kenya NCIA Arbitration Submission — a Request for Arbitration addressed to the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) under the NCIA Arbitration Rules 2015, compliant with the Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995.