Arbitration Clause (Philippines)
ARBITRATION CLAUSE
To be inserted into the [Contract Name] between [Party A Name] and [Party B Name]:
ARBITRATION
Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach, termination, or invalidity thereof, shall be finally settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the rules of [Arbitral Institution], as amended from time to time.
The seat of arbitration shall be [Seat of Arbitration]. The arbitral tribunal shall consist of [Number of Arbitrators] mutually agreed upon by the Parties, or, failing agreement, appointed in accordance with the rules of [Arbitral Institution].
The language of arbitration proceedings shall be [Language]. The substantive law governing this Agreement and all disputes arising hereunder shall be [Governing Law].
The award of the arbitral tribunal shall be final and binding upon the Parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction. For domestic awards, enforcement shall be pursuant to Republic Act No. 9285 (Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004) and A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC. For international awards, enforcement shall be pursuant to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), to which the Philippines acceded on July 6, 1967.
This arbitration clause shall be treated as an agreement independent of this [Contract Name] under the doctrine of separability affirmed in Del Monte Corporation-USA v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 136154, February 7, 2001). The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this [Contract Name] shall not affect the validity or enforceability of this arbitration clause.
Nothing in this clause shall prevent either Party from seeking interim or conservatory measures from the appropriate Regional Trial Court acting as Special Commercial Court under Rule 5 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC.
[Party A Name]
Party A
[Party B Name]
Party B
Party A
________________
Signature
Party B
________________
Signature
What Is a Arbitration Clause (Philippines)?
An Arbitration Clause in the Philippines records the terms on which the parties settle their dispute and bring the matter to a final, binding end.
An Arbitration Clause in the Philippines derives its legal force from Republic Act No. 9285 and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) in 1985, which RA 9285 adopts for international commercial arbitration under Section 19. For domestic arbitration, the clause is governed by the Domestic Arbitration Rules set out in the Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 9285 (2009, as amended). The Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, 2009) govern judicial proceedings related to arbitration, including petitions to confirm, vacate, or enforce arbitral awards filed with the Regional Trial Court designated as Special Commercial Court.
An Arbitration Clause differs from an Arbitration Agreement (a freestanding contract to arbitrate an existing dispute) in that the clause is a provision within the main contract, while a standalone arbitration agreement is executed separately. Under the doctrine of separability affirmed by the Supreme Court in Del Monte Corporation-USA v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 136154, February 7, 2001), an arbitration clause is treated as an agreement independent of the main contract — invalidity of the main contract does not automatically render the arbitration clause void.
For construction contracts in the Philippines, the Construction Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC) under Executive Order No. 1008 (1985) has original and exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising from construction contracts containing an arbitration clause, regardless of the arbitral body named in the clause. The Supreme Court in DPWH v. CMC/Monark/Pacific/Hi-Tri (G.R. No. 179732, September 17, 2008) confirmed CIAC's exclusive jurisdiction over construction disputes.
The legal framework governing the Arbitration Clause (Philippines) in Philippines draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Parties executing a Arbitration Clause (Philippines) in Philippines should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Arbitration Clause (Philippines)?
An Arbitration Clause is needed in any Philippine contract where the parties want to confirm that future disputes are resolved through private arbitration rather than through the court system of the Regional Trial Courts.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in construction contracts covered by Executive Order No. 1008 (1985). The Construction Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC) has exclusive and original jurisdiction over disputes arising from construction contracts containing an arbitration clause, making its inclusion mandatory for parties who want CIAC's specialized technical expertise in resolving disputes.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in joint venture agreements and partnership agreements between foreign and Philippine investors under Republic Act No. 7042 (Foreign Investments Act of 1991, as amended by RA 11647, 2022), where parties need a neutral dispute resolution mechanism that avoids perceived bias toward either the foreign or local party.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in commercial contracts between large corporations where confidentiality of dispute proceedings is commercially important. Unlike court proceedings, which are generally public under the Philippine Constitution (Article III, Section 14 on open trial), arbitration proceedings are private and the award may be kept confidential under Section 23 of RA 9285.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in franchise agreements, distribution agreements, and technology licensing agreements involving intellectual property governed by the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293, 1997), where the parties prefer the technical expertise of arbitrators with IP backgrounds over general trial court judges.
An Arbitration Clause is needed in contracts with government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) and government instrumentalities in the Philippines, subject to the limitations under Commission on Audit (COA) Circular No. 2012-003 on government settlement of monetary claims.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Arbitration Clause (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Arbitration Clause (Philippines)
A valid and enforceable Arbitration Clause for Philippine contracts must include the following essential elements under Republic Act No. 9285 and A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC.
Scope of Arbitrable Disputes: A clear definition of which disputes are covered — typically 'any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach, termination, or invalidity thereof.' Broad scope language is preferred to avoid arguments about whether a particular dispute falls within the clause, consistent with the pro-arbitration policy of RA 9285 as affirmed in LM Power Engineering Corp. v. Capitol Industrial Construction Groups (G.R. No. 141833, March 26, 2003).
Arbitral Institution: Name the specific arbitral institution whose rules will govern: Philippine Dispute Resolution Center, Inc. (PDRCI) for domestic commercial arbitration; Construction Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC) for construction contracts under EO 1008; International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) for international commercial disputes; Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) for cross-border disputes with Singapore seat; or ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2013).
Seat of Arbitration: The city or country where arbitration proceedings will be conducted — this determines the curial law governing procedural matters. For domestic arbitration, specify Manila, Quezon City, or another Philippine city. For international arbitration, the seat determines which national courts have supervisory jurisdiction.
Number of Arbitrators: One arbitrator for disputes below PHP 5,000,000; three arbitrators (one per party plus a presiding arbitrator) for disputes above that threshold, consistent with PDRCI Arbitration Rules (2020, Rule 8).
Language: Specify English or Filipino as the language of arbitration proceedings. English is standard for commercial contracts in the Philippines.
Governing Law: State the substantive law governing the contract (Civil Code of the Philippines, specific statutes) and the procedural law governing the arbitration (RA 9285 and A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC for domestic; New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, to which the Philippines acceded in 1967, for international awards).
Additional compliance elements for a Arbitration Clause (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Arbitration Clause (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-philippines
"Arbitration Clause (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-arbitration-clause-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Arbitration Clause (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/arbitration-clause-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
An arbitration clause is enforceable in the Philippines under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9285), which declares it the policy of the State to actively promote the use of alternative dispute resolution to achieve speedy and impartial justice. Under Section 2 of RA 9285 and the Special Rules of Court on ADR (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, 2009), Philippine courts are required to refer parties to arbitration when a valid arbitration clause exists and a party moves for referral before filing its answer. The Supreme Court in Fiesta World Mall Corporation v. Linberg Philippines, Inc. (G.R. No. 152471, August 18, 2006) upheld the enforceability of arbitration clauses, holding that once parties agree to arbitrate, courts must stay judicial proceedings and compel arbitration. The only grounds for refusing to enforce an arbitration clause are those in Section 8 of RA 9285: the agreement is null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.
PDRCI (Philippine Dispute Resolution Center, Inc.) and CIAC (Construction Industry Arbitration Commission) are the two primary arbitration institutions in the Philippines, but they serve different types of disputes. PDRCI is a private, non-profit arbitration institution that administers commercial arbitration under its PDRCI Arbitration Rules (2020) for general business disputes — contract disputes, corporate disagreements, commercial loans, joint ventures, and similar commercial matters. CIAC was established under Executive Order No. 1008 (1985) specifically for the construction industry and has original and exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising from contracts for construction, infrastructure, or related services in the Philippines. The Supreme Court in DPWH v. CMC/Monark/Pacific/Hi-Tri (G.R. No. 179732, September 17, 2008) confirmed that CIAC jurisdiction attaches automatically whenever a construction contract contains an arbitration clause, regardless of which institution is named. CIAC arbitrators are accredited engineers, architects, lawyers, and construction professionals with technical expertise in construction disputes.
An arbitration clause in the Philippines cannot exclude Philippine court jurisdiction entirely, but it substantially limits it. Under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (RA 9285) and the Special Rules of Court on ADR (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC), the Regional Trial Court designated as Special Commercial Court retains supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration for specific matters: (1) issuing interim measures of protection (injunctions, attachment orders) during arbitration under Rule 5 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC; (2) confirming, vacating, or modifying a domestic arbitral award under Sections 23-28 of RA 9285; (3) recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention (1958), to which the Philippines acceded by Senate Resolution No. 71, 1967; and (4) compelling a party to proceed to arbitration. The merits of the dispute are fully removed from court jurisdiction once the arbitration clause is invoked, consistent with the principle of kompetenz-kompetenz — the tribunal's power to rule on its own jurisdiction under Section 3.3 of the PDRCI Rules (2020).
A foreign arbitral award is recognized and enforced in the Philippines under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), to which the Philippines acceded on July 6, 1967, through Senate Resolution No. 71. Under Rule 13 of the Special Rules of Court on ADR (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, 2009), a party wishing to enforce a foreign arbitral award files a petition for recognition and enforcement before the Regional Trial Court acting as Special Commercial Court in the place where assets of the adverse party are located. The court recognizes the award unless the respondent proves one of the limited grounds for refusal under Article V of the New York Convention: incapacity of a party, invalidity of the arbitration agreement, denial of due process, excess of jurisdiction, irregular composition of the tribunal, non-finality of the award, non-arbitrability of the subject matter, or violation of Philippine public policy. The Supreme Court in Pacific China Holdings Ltd. v. Grand Pacific Holdings Corp. (G.R. No. 173341, February 24, 2011) applied the New York Convention grounds strictly, enforcing a foreign award over the respondent's objections.
An arbitration clause embedded in a Philippine contract does not need to be separately notarized to be valid and enforceable. Under Section 2 of Republic Act No. 9285, an arbitration agreement — whether contained as a clause in a contract or in a separate agreement — must be in writing, but no specific formality beyond writing is required for validity. An arbitration clause is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the parties, in an exchange of letters, telexes, telegrams, or other means of telecommunication, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defense in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by the other. If the principal contract is notarized (e.g., a deed of sale or mortgage deed under Article 1358 of the Civil Code), the arbitration clause within it benefits from the notarization of the whole instrument. For standalone arbitration agreements, notarization is advisable to provide prima facie evidence of due execution under Rule 132, Section 19 of the Rules of Court.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Arbitration Agreement (Philippines)
A standalone Arbitration Agreement for the Philippines to submit an existing dispute to binding arbitration under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9285). Covers scope, institution choice (PDRCI, CIAC, or ad hoc), seat, number of arbitrators, language, and costs. Compliant with UNCITRAL Model Law and A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC.
Mediation Agreement (Philippines)
A Mediation Agreement for the Philippines under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9285) and the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) Rules. Covers appointment of mediator, confidentiality, good faith participation, and effect of any settlement reached. Suitable for court-annexed and private mediation.
Compromise Agreement (Philippines)
A Compromise Agreement for the Philippines that settles disputes amicably under Article 2028 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. Covers mutual concessions, waiver of claims, and confidentiality. Valid as a contract and enforceable as a court judgment when judicially approved under Rule 17 of the Rules of Court.