Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK)
Key facts
Restrictive Covenant Agreement
This Restrictive Covenant Agreement (the "Agreement") is made on [Agreement Date].
Parties
BETWEEN:
(1) [Covenantor Name], of [Covenantor Address] (the "Covenantor"); and
(2) [Covenantee Company Name] (registration number [Covenantee Reg Number]), whose registered office or principal place of business is at [Covenantee Address] (the "Company" or "Covenantee").
Background
BACKGROUND
A. The Covenantor has acted in the capacity of [Covenantor Role] for or in connection with the Company in the context of: [Covenant Context].
B. In the course of that relationship, the Covenantor has had access to confidential information, trade secrets, and valuable connections with the Company's clients, customers, and employees.
C. The Company has legitimate business interests to protect, including: [Legitimate Interests].
D. The Parties have agreed that the Covenantor will observe the restrictions set out in this Agreement in consideration of the consideration described in clause 7.
Non-Competition
1. NON-COMPETITION
Non-compete included: [Non Compete Included].
1.1 The Covenantor shall not, for a period of [Non Compete Duration] commencing on the Termination Date (the "Restriction Period"), within the geographical area of [Non Compete Geography], directly or indirectly: (a) be employed by, engaged by, act as a consultant to, or be a director, partner, or officer of any person or entity engaged in the following activities: [Non Compete Activities]; or (b) carry on or establish any business in competition with the Company.
1.2 This clause shall be construed as a series of separate restrictions, each individually enforceable. If any individual restriction is found by a court to be unenforceable, that restriction shall be severed in accordance with the blue pencil test endorsed by the Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, without affecting the enforceability of the remaining restrictions.
Non-Solicitation
2. NON-SOLICITATION OF CLIENTS
Non-solicitation included: [Non Solicitation Included].
2.1 The Covenantor shall not, for a period of [Non Solicitation Duration] from the Termination Date, directly or indirectly solicit, canvass, or approach with a view to obtaining business from: [Non Solicitation Scope].
2.2 For the purposes of this clause, "solicitation" means actively approaching or contacting a client of the Company for the purpose of offering or providing goods or services in competition with the Company. It does not prevent the Covenantor from responding to an unsolicited approach from a client (but see clause 3 regarding non-dealing).
Non-Dealing
3. NON-DEALING
Non-dealing included: [Non Dealing Included].
3.1 The Covenantor shall not, for a period of [Non Dealing Duration] from the Termination Date, directly or indirectly deal with, accept business from, or provide services in competition with the Company to any client or customer who was a client or customer of the Company at the Termination Date and with whom the Covenantor had material business contact during the 12 months prior to the Termination Date.
Non-Poaching
4. NON-POACHING OF EMPLOYEES
Non-poaching included: [Non Poaching Included].
4.1 The Covenantor shall not, for a period of [Non Poaching Duration] from the Termination Date, directly or indirectly solicit, induce, encourage, or attempt to recruit: [Non Poaching Scope].
4.2 This clause does not prevent the Covenantor from placing a general advertisement for employment that is not specifically directed at employees of the Company.
Garden Leave
5. GARDEN LEAVE
Garden leave applies: [Garden Leave Applies].
5.1 During any notice period, the Company may, at its absolute discretion, require the Covenantor to remain away from the Company's premises and cease performing duties ("Garden Leave") for a period of up to [Garden Leave Max Period], while continuing to pay the Covenantor's salary and benefits in full.
5.2 Garden leave offset against post-termination restrictions: [Garden Leave Offset Applies]. Where the garden leave offset applies, any period of Garden Leave served shall be deducted from the corresponding post-termination restriction periods set out in clauses 1, 2, 3, and 4 above.
5.3 During any period of Garden Leave, the Covenantor's obligations of confidentiality and duties of good faith continue in full.
Consideration
6. CONSIDERATION
6.1 In consideration of the Covenantor agreeing to observe the restrictions set out in this Agreement, the Company agrees to provide the following: [Consideration Description].
6.2 Monetary consideration (if applicable): £[Consideration Amount].
6.3 The Covenantor acknowledges that the consideration is adequate and that the restrictions are reasonable and necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the Company.
General Provisions
7. GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.1 Reasonableness. Each of the covenants in this Agreement is a separate, independent covenant and is entered into by the Covenantor as reasonable in scope, duration, and geographical extent, having regard to the legitimate business interests of the Company identified in the Background section above.
7.2 Severance. In accordance with the blue pencil test and the Supreme Court's decision in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, if any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable, the offending words or provisions may be severed from this Agreement without affecting the enforceability of the remaining provisions.
7.3 Injunctive relief. The Covenantor acknowledges that a breach or threatened breach of this Agreement would cause irreparable damage to the Company for which monetary damages would be an inadequate remedy. The Company is therefore entitled to seek interlocutory and permanent injunctive relief from the courts of England and Wales without the necessity of proving actual damages.
7.4 Third party rights. The rights of third parties to enforce any term of this Agreement are excluded pursuant to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
7.5 Governing law and jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Each Party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales for the resolution of any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement.
7.6 Entire agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties in relation to its subject matter and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and agreements relating to post-termination restrictions.
7.7 Variation. This Agreement may not be varied except by written instrument signed by both Parties.
Execution
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have signed this Agreement on the date first written above.
SIGNED by [Covenantor Name] (Covenantor):
Signature: _______________________
Date: _______________________
SIGNED for and on behalf of [Covenantee Company Name]:
Authorised signatory: _______________________
Name: _______________________
Title: _______________________
Date: _______________________
[Covenantor Name] (Covenantor)
________________
Signature
Authorised signatory for [Covenantee Company Name]
________________
Signature
What Is a Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK)?
A Restrictive Covenant Agreement in the United Kingdom defines the rights, restrictions, and obligations attaching to a particular parcel of land and binds the owners who take it, and takes its legal force from the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Restrictive covenants are governed by the English common law doctrine of restraint of trade, which presumes that a restriction on a person's freedom to trade is void unless it can be shown to be reasonable in the interests of the parties and the public. The key authority on severance of unenforceable covenants is the Supreme Court decision in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, which confirmed that courts can use the 'blue pencil test' to sever unenforceable words from a covenant and enforce the remainder, provided the remaining covenant is grammatically sound and does not fundamentally alter the character of the restriction.
A standalone Restrictive Covenant Agreement is used where the parties wish to document post-termination restrictions separately from the main employment contract, consultancy agreement, or business sale agreement. This is common where restrictions are introduced or updated mid-employment, where consideration is provided on termination in exchange for the covenants, or where the parties wish to confirm that each set of restrictions is clearly identified and separately enforceable.
The legal framework governing the Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) in United Kingdom draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunal adjudicates workplace disputes. Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides early conciliation under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 govern personal data handling. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) administers PAYE and National Insurance contributions under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Parties executing a Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) in United Kingdom should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Employment Rights Act 1996 sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK)?
A Restrictive Covenant Agreement is needed whenever a business wishes to protect its legitimate interests — confidential information, client relationships, supplier connections, or a stable workforce — against the risk that a departing employee, director, consultant, or business seller will use their inside knowledge to compete or recruit.
Common situations requiring a Restrictive Covenant Agreement include: the departure of a senior employee, sales manager, or director who has detailed knowledge of the business's clients, pricing, and strategy; the sale of a business, where the seller agrees not to compete with the buyer in the same geographical area for a defined period; the exit of a shareholder or partner, where the exiting party agrees not to solicit clients or employees; the commencement of a new engagement, where restrictions are agreed at the outset in exchange for employment, a role, or investment; and situations where existing contractual restrictions are out of date or have expired and need to be refreshed.
In an employment context, restrictive covenants entered into at the start of employment are more likely to be enforceable than covenants imposed mid-employment (which require additional consideration to be valid). In a business sale context, covenants protecting goodwill are given more latitude by courts because the seller is being paid for that goodwill and it would be unconscionable for them to immediately undermine it. In all contexts, a formal written agreement that clearly identifies the specific interests being protected and imposes restrictions that are proportionate in duration, scope, and geography will maximise the prospect of enforcement.
Parties in United Kingdom should prepare a Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunal adjudicates workplace disputes. Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides early conciliation under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 govern personal data handling. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) administers PAYE and National Insurance contributions under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK)
A well-drafted Restrictive Covenant Agreement under English law must contain several key provisions to maximise enforceability.
The parties and context section identifies the Covenantor and the Covenantee, describes the nature of their relationship (employment, consultancy, business sale, or shareholder exit), and specifies the legitimate business interests that the covenants are designed to protect. This background is important because English courts assess the reasonableness of a covenant in light of the specific context and interests identified.
The non-competition clause must be limited in three dimensions: the activities restricted (which should be defined by reference to the Covenantee's actual business, not every conceivable commercial activity); the duration (which should be no longer than is necessary to allow the Covenantee to stabilise its client relationships after the Covenantor's departure — typically 3-12 months in employment contexts); and the geographical area (which should reflect the actual area in which the Covenantee's business operates).
The non-solicitation and non-dealing clauses should identify the relevant clients by reference to those with whom the Covenantor had a material personal relationship during a defined lookback period (typically 12 months before termination). Limiting the restriction to clients the Covenantor actually dealt with is more likely to be upheld as reasonable than a blanket restriction on all of the Covenantee's clients.
The non-poaching clause should be limited to senior, key, or specialised employees rather than all staff, and should include a carve-out for general advertisements not specifically directed at the Covenantee's employees.
The garden leave interaction is critical: where garden leave is contractually provided for, any period of garden leave should be offset against the post-termination restriction periods to confirm that the overall period of restraint remains proportionate.
The consideration clause should record what the Covenantor receives in exchange for giving the covenants. A covenant with no consideration is unenforceable. In an employment context, the offer of employment (or continued employment) is consideration; on termination, a payment is typically required.
The severance clause should expressly invoke the blue pencil test from Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, confirming that the covenants are intended to be severable and that courts are authorised to remove unenforceable words without voiding the entire agreement. The governing law clause should confirm that the agreement is subject to the laws of England and Wales, and the parties should submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
Additional compliance elements for a Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) used in United Kingdom include: Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunal adjudicates workplace disputes. Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides early conciliation under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 govern personal data handling. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) administers PAYE and National Insurance contributions under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for United Kingdom-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
CC BY 4.0 · free to citeReference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk
"Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk.
Forms Legal. "Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom)." Forms Legal, 2026. https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk.
@misc{formslegal-restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Employment Rights Act 1996}
}{{cite web |title=Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom) |website=Forms Legal |publisher=Forms Legal |date=2026 |url=https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk}}TY - ELEC T1 - Restrictive Covenant Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom) T2 - Forms Legal PB - Forms Legal PY - 2026 UR - https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/restrictive-covenant-agreement-uk ER -
Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Restrictive covenants are enforceable under English law, but they are subject to the doctrine of restraint of trade. A covenant in restraint of trade is presumed void unless the party seeking to enforce it can establish that: (1) the covenant protects a legitimate business interest; (2) the covenant is reasonable as between the parties; and (3) the covenant is reasonable in the public interest. The legitimate business interests that English law recognises include trade secrets and confidential information, client and customer connections (where the employee had a personal relationship with clients), and the stability of the workforce. The reasonableness test examines whether the restriction is no wider than is reasonably necessary to protect those interests, taking into account the scope of the restricted activities, the duration of the restriction, and the geographical area covered. The leading modern authority is Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, in which the Supreme Court confirmed that courts have the power to sever (remove) unenforceable parts of a restrictive covenant and enforce what remains, provided that severance does not fundamentally alter the character of the covenant.
The three types of covenant operate at different levels of restriction and are therefore given different degrees of judicial scrutiny. A non-solicitation covenant prevents the Covenantor from actively approaching the Covenantee's clients to offer competing services. The Covenantor can, however, accept business from clients who contact them voluntarily. Non-solicitation covenants are relatively easy to enforce because they only restrict active approaches and do not prevent all commercial activity. A non-dealing covenant goes further: it prevents the Covenantor from dealing with specified clients at all, even where the client initiates contact. Because it restricts passive as well as active conduct, non-dealing covenants are harder to enforce and courts require clearer justification for their scope. A non-compete covenant is the most restrictive: it prevents the Covenantor from working in the same industry or sector altogether, regardless of whether they are dealing with the Covenantee's specific clients. Non-compete covenants are subject to the highest scrutiny and must be limited by reference to the specific activities that competed with the Covenantee's business, the geographical area where that business operated, and a duration proportionate to the need to protect the specific legitimate interests identified.
Prior to Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, English law applied a restrictive approach to the severance of unenforceable restrictive covenants. The courts would only sever words if they could be 'blue pencilled' (deleted without replacement) without fundamentally altering the scope or character of the remaining covenant, and the words to be deleted could not be too 'central' to the overall agreement. In Tillman, Ms Tillman was subject to a clause that prevented her from being 'interested in' a competitor, which a majority of the Supreme Court held was too wide because it would prevent her from holding even a minor shareholding. However, the Supreme Court overruled the prior authority (Attwood v Lamont) that had prevented severance in these circumstances, and held that unenforceable words could be severed from a restrictive covenant provided that: (a) the unenforceable words are capable of being removed without adding to or modifying the remaining language; (b) the remaining terms still make grammatical and legal sense; and (c) the removal of those words does not fundamentally change the overall nature of the restriction. This decision makes it more likely that courts will salvage partially unenforceable covenants rather than voiding them entirely, which increases the practical importance of drafting covenants as a series of separate, severable restrictions.
Garden leave is a contractual mechanism under which, during the notice period, the employer can require an employee to stay away from the workplace while remaining on full pay and benefits. It serves a similar function to a non-compete covenant because it prevents the employee from working for a competitor during the notice period, by which time their knowledge of current clients, strategies, and confidential information will be fresher. Under English law (confirmed in William Hill Organisation Ltd v Tucker [1999] ICR 291), an employer cannot unilaterally place an employee on garden leave unless there is an express contractual right to do so. The interaction between garden leave and post-termination restrictions is significant: a court may take into account a period of garden leave when assessing whether post-termination restrictions are reasonable in duration. Specifically, if an employee has been on six months' garden leave, a court may be more willing to enforce a further six months of post-termination restrictions than it would be if the employee had been actively working until the last day of their notice period. Many employment agreements provide that any period of garden leave served will be offset (deducted) from the post-termination restriction period, reducing the overall period of constraint on the employee.
Where a restrictive covenant is breached or is at risk of being breached, the Covenantee has several remedies available under English law. The most immediate and practically important remedy is an injunction. The Covenantee can apply to the courts of England and Wales for an urgent interlocutory (interim) injunction to restrain the Covenantor from continuing the breach while the full merits of the case are determined. The courts apply the American Cyanamid [1975] AC 396 test: (1) is there a serious issue to be tried? (2) would damages be an adequate remedy? (3) does the balance of convenience favour granting the injunction? In restrictive covenant cases, courts often find that damages are inadequate (because the Covenantee's client relationships and confidential information are difficult to value) and therefore grant injunctions. In addition to injunctions, the Covenantee may claim damages for the loss caused by the breach, an account of profits (requiring the Covenantor to disgorge any profits made from the breach), or — in exceptional cases — delivery up of confidential documents. Enforcement requires the covenant to be documented in a signed written agreement, which is why a formal Restrictive Covenant Agreement is strongly recommended.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Non-Compete Agreement (UK)
Protect your business from competitive harm after an employee's departure with a legally sound Non-Compete Agreement drafted for England and Wales. This template incorporates the restraint of trade doctrine established in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt (1894), the blue pencil severability principles confirmed by the Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder [2019] UKSC 32, and practical provisions for garden leave offsets, compensation during the restricted period, and confidentiality obligations. Designed for senior employees, key account managers, and technical staff with access to trade secrets.
Employment Contract (England & Wales)
Hiring someone in England or Wales? You are legally required to give them a written statement of employment particulars on or before their first day of work. Our UK Employment Contract template meets all requirements of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and covers working hours, salary, holiday entitlement, notice periods, pension auto-enrolment, confidentiality, and optional restrictive covenants. Download as PDF or Word in minutes.
Director's Service Agreement (UK)
Formalise the appointment of a company director in England and Wales with a detailed Director's Service Agreement. This legally binding contract sets out the director's duties, remuneration, benefits, restrictive covenants, garden leave, termination provisions, and intellectual property obligations in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, the Employment Rights Act 1996, and HMRC regulations. Whether you are appointing a managing director, finance director, or any other executive director, this template provides the well-structured legal framework required under English law.
Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) (UK)
Protect your confidential business information in England and Wales with a legally sound Non-Disclosure Agreement. Whether you are sharing trade secrets with a prospective partner, disclosing proprietary technology to a developer, or presenting financial projections to a potential investor, a properly drafted UK NDA keeps your sensitive information under strict legal protection. Our template is drafted in accordance with English common law and incorporates the key provisions required for enforceability in England and Wales.
Settlement Agreement (England & Wales)
Create a legally compliant Settlement Agreement for England and Wales. Formerly known as a compromise agreement, this document settles employment claims upon termination. Covers termination payments (tax-free up to £30,000 under s.401 ITEPA 2003), waiver of claims under ERA 1996 and Equality Act 2010, independent legal advice certificate, agreed reference, garden leave, post-termination restrictions, and ACAS COT3 compliance. Download as PDF or Word.