Non-Compete Agreement (UK)
This Non-Compete Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into on [Effective Date] (the "Effective Date") by and between:
[Employer Name], [Employer Type], with its registered or principal address at [Employer Address], [Employer City], [Employer County], [Employer Postcode], England (hereinafter referred to as the "Employer"); and
[Employee Name], an individual, residing at [Employee Address], [Employee City], [Employee County], [Employee Postcode], England (hereinafter referred to as the "Employee").
The Employer and the Employee are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party".
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, the Employee is employed by the Employer in the role of [Job Title], with responsibilities including [Job Description];
WHEREAS, in the course of the Employee's employment, the Employee has access to and acquires knowledge of the Employer's confidential information, trade secrets, client relationships, and business goodwill;
WHEREAS, the Employer has a legitimate business interest in protecting [Legitimate Interests] from disclosure, misuse, or exploitation following the termination of the Employee's employment;
WHEREAS, in consideration of [Consideration Type] ([Additional Consideration]), the Employee agrees to be bound by the restrictive covenants set out in this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings set out herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, the Parties agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS
1.1 In this Agreement:
"Competing Business" means [Competing Business].
"Restricted Period" means a period of [Restricted Period] commencing on the date on which the Employee's employment with the Employer terminates for whatever reason (the "Termination Date").
"Restricted Area" means [Restricted Area].
"Confidential Information" means any information of a confidential or proprietary nature relating to the business, affairs, customers, clients, suppliers, finances, or technology of the Employer, including but not limited to trade secrets, know-how, customer lists, pricing strategies, business plans, product designs, marketing strategies, and financial projections.
2. NON-COMPETE COVENANT
2.1 The Employee covenants that during the Restricted Period and within the Restricted Area, the Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, whether on the Employee's own account or in conjunction with or on behalf of any other person, firm, or company:
[Restricted Activities].
2.2 The restrictions in clause 2.1 are considered by the Parties to be reasonable in all the circumstances as at the date of this Agreement. Each restriction in clause 2.1 is intended to be a separate and independent restriction so that if any individual restriction is found to be void or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining restrictions shall continue to apply to the fullest extent permitted by law.
3. CONFIDENTIALITY
3.1 The Employee acknowledges that during the course of employment, the Employee has had access to Confidential Information belonging to the Employer.
3.2 The Employee shall not, during or after employment, use or disclose to any third party any Confidential Information, except as required in the proper performance of the Employee's duties or with the Employer's prior written consent.
3.3 This obligation of confidentiality shall continue without limit of time and is without prejudice to the Employer's rights under common law and equity in respect of trade secrets and confidential information.
4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
4.1 The Employee acknowledges that all intellectual property created by the Employee during the course of employment belongs to the Employer in accordance with sections 39 and 40 of the Patents Act 1977 and section 11(2) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
4.2 The Employee shall not, following termination, use or exploit any intellectual property belonging to the Employer in connection with any Competing Business or for any other purpose.
5. SEVERABILITY AND BLUE PENCIL
5.1 If any provision of this Agreement is held by any court or other competent authority to be invalid, void, or unenforceable in whole or in part, the other provisions of this Agreement and the remainder of the affected provision shall continue in full force and effect.
5.2 In accordance with the principle confirmed by the Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, if any restrictive covenant in this Agreement is found to be unenforceable by reason of its width, but would be valid if part of the wording were deleted, the covenant shall apply with such words deleted as may be necessary to make the covenant valid and enforceable.
5.3 Each restrictive covenant in clause 2 is intended to be severable and independent. If any individual covenant is struck down, the remaining covenants shall continue in full force and effect.
6. REMEDIES
6.1 The Employee acknowledges that a breach of the covenants in clause 2 would cause the Employer irreparable harm that could not be adequately compensated by an award of damages alone.
6.2 Accordingly, in the event of an actual or threatened breach, the Employer shall be entitled, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies available to it, to seek interim and final injunctive relief from the courts of England and Wales to prevent or restrain any breach or threatened breach of this Agreement.
6.3 The rights and remedies of the Employer under this Agreement are cumulative and are in addition to any other rights and remedies available at law or in equity.
7. NO WAIVER
7.1 A failure or delay by the Employer to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that or any other right or remedy, nor shall it prevent or restrict the further exercise of that right or remedy.
8. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS
8.1 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no right under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any of its terms.
9. GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION
9.1 This Agreement and any dispute or claim (including non-contractual disputes or claims) arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter or formation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales.
9.2 Each Party irrevocably agrees that the courts of England and Wales shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim (including non-contractual disputes or claims) arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or its subject matter or formation.
10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
10.1 This Agreement, together with the Employee's contract of employment and any other agreements expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties in relation to the subject matter of this Agreement.
10.2 No amendment or variation of this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by both Parties.
11. EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
11.1 The Employee acknowledges that:
- the Employee has read and understood this Agreement;
- the Employee has had the opportunity to take independent legal advice before signing this Agreement;
- the restrictions in this Agreement are reasonable and necessary for the protection of the Employer's legitimate business interests;
- the Employee's skills, qualifications, and experience are such that the restrictions in this Agreement will not prevent the Employee from earning a living; and
- the Employee agrees to be bound by this Agreement as a condition of employment (or continued employment or the provision of additional consideration, as applicable).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Non-Compete Agreement as of the Effective Date first written above.
THE EMPLOYER
Company: [Employer Name]
Address: [Employer Address], [Employer City], [Employer County], [Employer Postcode], England
THE EMPLOYEE
Full name: [Employee Name]
Address: [Employee Address], [Employee City], [Employee County], [Employee Postcode], England
Employer
________________
Signature
Date: ________________
Employee
________________
Signature
Date: ________________
What Is a Non-Compete Agreement (UK)?
A Non-Compete Agreement in the United Kingdom binds the parties to keep specified information confidential and limits how it may be used or disclosed, and takes its legal force from the common-law doctrine of restraint of trade.
Under English common law, non-compete agreements are subject to the doctrine of restraint of trade, which holds that any contractual provision that restricts a person's freedom to carry on their trade or profession is prima facie void and unenforceable. However, the employer may rebut this presumption by demonstrating that the restriction: (a) protects a legitimate business interest; and (b) goes no further than is reasonably necessary to protect that interest. This two-limb test was established in the landmark House of Lords decision in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535 and has been applied consistently by English courts for over a century.
The Supreme Court's decision in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 was a landmark development in the law of non-compete covenants. The case clarified the application of the 'blue pencil' test for severing unenforceable words from a restrictive covenant. The Supreme Court held that a court may delete unenforceable words from a non-compete clause, provided that the deletion does not require the addition or modification of the remaining wording, the remaining terms are supported by adequate consideration, and the deletion does not fundamentally change the character of the contract.
Our UK Non-Compete Agreement template is drafted specifically for use in employment relationships governed by the laws of England and Wales. It provides a thorough framework covering restricted activities, restricted area, restricted period, garden leave offsets, consideration, confidentiality, intellectual property, severability, and remedies including injunctive relief.
The legal framework governing the Non-Compete Agreement (UK) in United Kingdom draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunal adjudicates workplace disputes. Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides early conciliation under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 govern personal data handling. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) administers PAYE and National Insurance contributions under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Parties executing a Non-Compete Agreement (UK) in United Kingdom should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The common-law doctrine of restraint of trade sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Non-Compete Agreement (UK)?
A Non-Compete Agreement is appropriate in employment contexts where the employee occupies a position of sufficient seniority, influence, or access to confidential information that their departure and subsequent engagement in a competing business could cause significant harm to the employer. English courts have consistently held that non-compete restrictions should not be used as a blanket measure for all employees but should be reserved for those whose roles genuinely justify such protection.
Common situations in which a UK Non-Compete Agreement is appropriate include: senior executives, managing directors, and C-suite officers who have thorough knowledge of the company's strategy, finances, and operations; key account managers and sales directors who have developed close personal relationships with clients and customers that are closely connected to the employer's goodwill; technical and scientific staff who have access to proprietary technology, research data, trade secrets, or intellectual property that is core to the employer's competitive advantage; and partners and senior professionals in professional services firms (such as law firms, consulting firms, and accountancy firms) who have developed client followings.
A Non-Compete Agreement may be entered into at the commencement of employment (in which case the offer of employment constitutes the consideration), or during an existing employment relationship (in which case fresh consideration must be provided). The agreement may be a standalone document or may form part of the employment contract, typically in a 'restrictive covenants' clause.
The United Kingdom Non-Compete Agreement (UK) essential that the employer carefully considers the scope of the restriction at the time it is imposed. English courts assess reasonableness at the date the covenant was entered into, not at the date of enforcement. A restriction that was reasonable when entered into may be enforced even if circumstances have changed, but a restriction that was unreasonable at inception cannot be saved by subsequent events. For this reason, employers should review and, if necessary, update non-compete covenants when an employee is promoted or takes on new responsibilities that expose them to additional confidential information or client relationships.
Employers should also consider whether a non-solicitation or non-dealing covenant (which restricts the employee from soliciting or dealing with specific clients rather than from working for a competitor at all) would provide adequate protection, as courts are more likely to uphold a narrower restriction.
What to Include in Your Non-Compete Agreement (UK)
A well-drafted Non-Compete Agreement for use in England and Wales should contain several essential provisions to maximise its enforceability under the restraint of trade doctrine.
The identification of legitimate business interests is the starting point for any enforceable non-compete clause. Under the Nordenfelt test, the employer must demonstrate that the restriction protects a recognisable interest that goes beyond simply preventing competition. The categories of legitimate interest recognised by English courts include: trade secrets and highly confidential information (Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 distinguished between ordinary confidential information and trade secrets); client and customer connections (where the employee has developed personal relationships with clients that are closely tied to the employer's goodwill); and the stability of the employer's workforce (where the departure of a key employee, followed by the poaching of team members, could destabilise the business).
The definition of restricted activities should be specific and proportionate. Following Tillman v Egon Zehnder [2019] UKSC 32, it is critical to avoid overly broad language. Each restriction should be drafted as a separate and independent covenant so that if one is struck down, the others survive. Common restrictions include: working for a competing business, establishing a competing business, soliciting or dealing with clients, and poaching employees.
The restricted period must be no longer than is reasonably necessary. Courts have upheld periods of 6 to 12 months for most senior employees. The inclusion of a garden leave offset (which reduces the restricted period by any period of garden leave served) is increasingly expected by courts and significantly improves enforceability, as recognised in Credit Suisse Asset Management Ltd v Armstrong [1996] ICR 882.
The restricted area must be reasonable and linked to the employer's actual area of business operations. For national businesses, a nationwide restriction may be justified. For local or regional businesses, a city-wide or county-wide restriction may be more appropriate.
The blue pencil and severability clause should be included to take advantage of the Supreme Court's ruling in Tillman, which permits courts to sever unenforceable words from a covenant without rewriting it.
The remedies clause should acknowledge that damages may be inadequate and expressly preserve the employer's right to seek interim and final injunctive relief from the courts of England and Wales. The governing law clause should specify England and Wales.
Additional compliance elements for a Non-Compete Agreement (UK) used in United Kingdom include: Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunal adjudicates workplace disputes. Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) provides early conciliation under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 govern personal data handling. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) administers PAYE and National Insurance contributions under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for United Kingdom-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Non-Compete Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-uk
"Non-Compete Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-uk.
@misc{formslegal-non-compete-agreement-uk,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Non-Compete Agreement (UK) (United Kingdom)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/uk/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-uk}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Common law doctrine of restraint of trade}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Non-compete agreements are enforceable under English law, but they are subject to the doctrine of restraint of trade, which holds that any clause that restricts a person's freedom to trade or work is prima facie void and unenforceable unless the party seeking to enforce it can demonstrate that: (a) the restriction protects a legitimate business interest (such as trade secrets, client connections, or workforce stability); and (b) the restriction goes no further than is reasonably necessary to protect that interest. This principle was established in the landmark case of Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535, in which the House of Lords held that a restraint of trade is valid only if it is reasonable in the interests of the parties and reasonable in the interests of the public. English courts scrutinise non-compete clauses closely and will not uphold restrictions that are too wide in scope, duration, or geographical area. The burden of proof lies on the employer to demonstrate reasonableness at the time the restriction was entered into.
The 'blue pencil' test is a common law doctrine that permits a court to sever (delete) unenforceable words from a restrictive covenant, leaving the remainder enforceable, without rewriting the clause. In Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32, the Supreme Court clarified and modernised the test for severance of non-compete covenants. The case concerned a non-compete clause that prohibited Ms Tillman from being 'engaged or concerned or interested in' any competing business. The words 'or interested in' were held to be unreasonably wide because they would have prevented her from holding even a small, passive minority shareholding in a listed company. However, the Supreme Court held that the words 'or interested in' could be severed using the blue pencil test, leaving the remainder of the clause enforceable. The Supreme Court set out a three-stage test for severance: (1) the unenforceable provision is capable of being removed without the necessity of adding to or modifying the wording of the remainder; (2) the remaining terms continue to be supported by adequate consideration; and (3) the removal of the provision does not so change the character of the contract that it becomes 'not the sort of contract that the parties entered into at all'. Following Tillman, it is good practice to draft each restrictive covenant as a separate and independent obligation to maximise the prospects of severance if any individual covenant is struck down.
There is no statutory limit on the duration of a non-compete restriction in England and Wales. However, English courts assess the duration as part of the overall reasonableness test. In practice, courts have consistently upheld restrictions of 6 to 12 months for most employees, particularly those in senior or client-facing roles with access to confidential information. Restrictions of 3 to 6 months are more commonly upheld for mid-level employees. Restrictions exceeding 12 months are harder to justify and are typically reserved for very senior executives, such as managing directors, chief executives, or partners in professional firms, where the employer can demonstrate that a longer period is genuinely necessary to protect its interests. In TFS Derivatives Ltd v Morgan [2005] IRLR 246, the court considered a 12-month non-compete restriction on a senior broker and noted that the appropriate duration depends on factors including the employee's seniority, the nature of the confidential information to which they had access, and the time it would take the employer to protect its interests after the employee's departure. A restriction that exceeds what is reasonably necessary will be void in its entirety, unless the blue pencil test can be applied to reduce the period.
Garden leave is a period during which an employee who has given or received notice of termination remains employed and continues to receive their salary and benefits, but is not required to attend the workplace or perform any duties. English courts increasingly recognise that garden leave serves a similar purpose to a post-termination non-compete restriction: it keeps the employee away from clients, colleagues, and confidential information during the notice period. In Credit Suisse Asset Management Ltd v Armstrong [1996] ICR 882, the Court of Appeal acknowledged that a period of garden leave may be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of a post-termination restrictive covenant. For this reason, many employers include a 'garden leave offset' clause in their non-compete agreements, which provides that the restricted period will be reduced by the length of any garden leave served. This improves the prospects of enforceability because it demonstrates that the overall restriction is proportionate and that the employer is not seeking to impose a restriction that goes beyond what is necessary. If no garden leave offset is included, a court may still take the garden leave period into account as a factor when assessing reasonableness.
Under English contract law, a non-compete agreement must be supported by valid consideration to be enforceable. If the non-compete clause is included in the original contract of employment at the time the employee is hired, the offer of employment itself constitutes sufficient consideration. However, if the employer seeks to impose a non-compete restriction on an existing employee (for example, because the employee has been promoted to a more senior role or has gained access to more sensitive information), fresh consideration must be provided. Fresh consideration may take the form of a promotion, a salary increase, a bonus payment, access to additional confidential information, or the conferral of new responsibilities. In Regent Park Health Centre Ltd v Ahmad [2019] EWHC 1600 (Ch), the court considered whether continued employment alone constituted sufficient consideration for a post-employment restrictive covenant and held that each case depends on its specific facts. To minimise risk, employers should confirm that fresh consideration is clearly identified and documented in the non-compete agreement.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Employment Contract (England & Wales)
Hiring someone in England or Wales? You are legally required to give them a written statement of employment particulars on or before their first day of work. Our UK Employment Contract template meets all requirements of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and covers working hours, salary, holiday entitlement, notice periods, pension auto-enrolment, confidentiality, and optional restrictive covenants. Download as PDF or Word in minutes.
Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) (UK)
Protect your confidential business information in England and Wales with a legally sound Non-Disclosure Agreement. Whether you are sharing trade secrets with a prospective partner, disclosing proprietary technology to a developer, or presenting financial projections to a potential investor, a properly drafted UK NDA keeps your sensitive information under strict legal protection. Our template is drafted in accordance with English common law and incorporates the key provisions required for enforceability in England and Wales.
Service Agreement (UK)
Create a detailed UK service agreement governed by the laws of England and Wales. Covers the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, UK GDPR, IR35, VAT, intellectual property, and confidentiality. Suitable for consultants, freelancers, agencies, and businesses of all sizes.
Consultancy Agreement (UK)
Create a detailed UK Consultancy Agreement governed by the laws of England and Wales. This template covers scope of services, fees and payment in GBP, intellectual property ownership, confidentiality, data protection (UK GDPR / Data Protection Act 2018), IR35 off-payroll working status, right of substitution, non-solicitation, insurance requirements, limitation of liability, and indemnity. Suitable for limited companies, LLPs, sole traders, partnerships, and individuals. Fill out the wizard, preview in real time, and download as PDF or Word.