Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Court Branch]
In the Matter of the Petition for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award,
[Petitioner Name], Petitioner,
- versus -
[Respondent Name], Respondent.
PETITION FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD
New York Convention (1958) • Republic Act No. 9285 (ADR Act of 2004), Sections 42-45 • Rule 13, A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC (Special ADR Rules, 2009)
PETITIONER [Petitioner Name], a corporation/entity organized under the laws of [Petitioner Nationality], with address at [Petitioner Address], by counsel, respectfully states:
I. THE PARTIES
1. Petitioner [Petitioner Name] is the award creditor, organized and existing under the laws of [Petitioner Nationality], with principal address at [Petitioner Address].
2. Respondent [Respondent Name] is the award debtor, with principal office at [Respondent Address], and is subject to the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court.
II. THE FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD
3. On [Award Date], the [Arbitral Institution], in [Seat], rendered a final arbitral award in [Case Number] in favor of Petitioner and against Respondent. The award arose from the following dispute: [Award Summary].
4. The arbitral award orders Respondent to pay Petitioner the sum of [Award Amount]. The award is final, binding, and has not been set aside or suspended by any court in [Seat].
5. The arbitration was conducted pursuant to the arbitration agreement dated [Agreement Date]. The seat of arbitration, [Seat], is a contracting state to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958): [Convention Country].
III. LEGAL BASIS
6. The Philippines is a contracting state to the New York Convention (1958), having acceded on July 6, 1967. Section 42 of Republic Act No. 9285 (Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004) mandates that foreign arbitral awards covered by the New York Convention shall be recognized as binding and enforced in accordance with the Rules of Court.
7. Rule 13 of the Special Rules of Court on ADR (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, 2009) vests this Honorable Court with jurisdiction as a Special Commercial Court to hear and decide petitions for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
8. None of the grounds for refusal of recognition under Article V of the New York Convention and Section 45 of RA 9285 are present. The arbitration agreement is valid, Respondent was duly notified of and participated in the proceedings, the tribunal was properly constituted, and recognition and enforcement are not contrary to Philippine public policy.
9. Petitioner is entitled to interest on the award amount at the legal rate of 6% per annum from the date of the award until full payment, pursuant to BSP Circular No. 799 (2013) as applied in Nacar v. Gallery Frames (G.R. No. 189871, August 13, 2013).
IV. PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully prays that this Honorable Court:
(a) RECOGNIZE the foreign arbitral award dated [Award Date] rendered by the [Arbitral Institution] in [Case Number] as binding and enforceable in the Philippines;
(b) ORDER the issuance of a Writ of Execution to enforce payment of [Award Amount] plus interest at 6% per annum from [Award Date] until full payment;
(c) GRANT such other relief as may be just and equitable, including: [Additional Relief].
[Petitioner Name] respectfully submits this Petition on [Filing Date].
[Petitioner Name]
Petitioner
By: ________________________
Authorized Representative / Counsel
IBP No.: ____________; PTR No.: ____________
Roll No.: ____________; MCLE Compliance No.: ____________
Petitioner / Authorized Representative
________________
Signature
What Is a Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines)?
A Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in the Philippines states the claim and the grounds for it, asking the competent body to act on the matter raised.
A foreign arbitral award under the New York Convention refers to an award made in a country other than the Philippines, or an award not considered domestic under Philippine law, arising from a dispute over matters capable of settlement by arbitration. Under Section 42 of RA 9285, a foreign arbitral award shall be recognized as binding and shall be enforced in accordance with the Rules of Court upon application before the appropriate RTC Special Commercial Court. The RTC has original and exclusive jurisdiction over petitions for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under Section 5.2 of Republic Act No. 8799 (Securities Regulation Code) as applied to commercial matters.
The grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement are strictly limited to those enumerated in Article V of the New York Convention: incapacity of a party or invalidity of the arbitration agreement; denial of notice or inability to present one's case; excess of jurisdiction by the arbitral tribunal; improper composition of the arbitral tribunal or irregular procedure; the award has not yet become binding or has been set aside or suspended by the competent authority of the country in which the award was made; the subject matter is not arbitrable under Philippine law; and recognition or enforcement would be contrary to Philippine public policy. Philippine courts apply these grounds narrowly, as confirmed in Korea Technologies Co. Ltd. v. Lerma (G.R. No. 143581, January 7, 2008).
A Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award is distinct from a Petition for Enforcement of a Domestic Arbitral Award, which is governed by Rule 11 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, and from a Petition for Recognition of Foreign Judgment under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, which applies to judgments of foreign courts rather than arbitral tribunals. The enforcement petition may be filed simultaneously with or after a petition for recognition, or the petitioner may seek both recognition and enforcement in a single petition.
When Do You Need a Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines)?
A Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in the Philippines is needed whenever a party who has obtained an arbitral award from a foreign arbitral institution or ad hoc tribunal seeks to collect that award against assets or persons within the Philippines.
A Petition for Enforcement is needed when a foreign corporation wins an arbitral award from SIAC (Singapore International Arbitration Centre), ICC (International Chamber of Commerce), HKIAC (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre), or another foreign institution against a Philippine company, and the Philippine respondent refuses to voluntarily comply with the award.
A Petition for Enforcement is required when the award debtor has bank accounts, real property, shares of stock, or other assets in the Philippines that must be levied upon or garnished to satisfy the award. The petition is the jurisdictional basis for all enforcement mechanisms under the Rules of Court.
A Petition for Enforcement is needed when a Philippine overseas worker, seafarer, or professional has obtained an arbitral award abroad and needs to enforce it against a Philippine manning agency, recruitment agency, or employer with Philippine assets.
A Petition for Enforcement is required before any writ of execution, attachment, or garnishment may issue against Philippine-based assets — Philippine courts will not recognize or enforce any foreign award without a judicial recognition order from the RTC Special Commercial Court.
A Petition for Enforcement is needed when time is of the essence, as it may be filed together with an application for a writ of preliminary attachment under Rule 57 of the Rules of Court to prevent dissipation of the respondent's assets while the enforcement petition is pending.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines)
A valid Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in the Philippines must contain the following elements to comply with Rule 13 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC and Article IV of the New York Convention.
Court and Jurisdiction: Caption identifying the RTC Special Commercial Court of the judicial region where the respondent or its assets are located. Under Rule 13.1 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, the petition is filed with the RTC in the place where the assets are located or where the respondent has its principal office.
Parties: Full legal names, nationalities, and addresses of the petitioner (award creditor) and respondent (award debtor). For corporate parties, include SEC registration number under the Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232) or the equivalent foreign registration. A foreign corporation must allege whether it is licensed to do business in the Philippines (RA 11232, Section 142) — the Supreme Court in B. Van Zuiden Bros., Ltd. v. GTVL Manufacturing Industries, Inc. (G.R. No. 147905, May 28, 2007) held that an unlicensed foreign corporation may still sue to enforce a foreign arbitral award.
Description of the Award: Full particulars of the arbitral award — the arbitral institution or tribunal name, case number, date of award, and seat of arbitration. State whether the award is final and binding. Attach a duly authenticated original or certified copy of the award, as required by Article IV(1)(a) of the New York Convention.
Arbitration Agreement: Attach a duly authenticated original or certified copy of the arbitration agreement or the contract containing the arbitration clause, as required by Article IV(1)(b) of the New York Convention.
Translation: If the award or arbitration agreement is in a language other than English or Filipino, attach a certified translation by a qualified translator, as required by Article IV(2) of the New York Convention.
Relief Sought: Specific prayer for an order recognizing the foreign arbitral award as binding and enforceable in the Philippines, and directing the issuance of a writ of execution. The petition may also pray for preliminary attachment under Rule 57 of the Rules of Court.
Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping: Signed by the petitioner or its authorized representative with a Special Power of Attorney or Board Resolution. The Certification Against Forum Shopping under Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court is mandatory — failure to attach it is a ground for dismissal.
Docket Fees: Filing fees must be paid to the RTC Clerk of Court based on the amount of the award, computed under Rule 141 of the Rules of Court.
Additional compliance elements for a Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/enforcement-foreign-arbitral-award-philippines
"Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/enforcement-foreign-arbitral-award-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-enforcement-foreign-arbitral-award-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/contracts/enforcement-foreign-arbitral-award-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Petitions for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the Philippines are filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) designated as a Special Commercial Court. Under Rule 13.1 of the Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, 2009) and Section 5.2 of Republic Act No. 8799 (Securities Regulation Code), Special Commercial Courts have original and exclusive jurisdiction over these petitions. The Supreme Court has designated specific RTC branches in each judicial region as Special Commercial Courts through administrative orders. In Metro Manila, the designated Special Commercial Courts are located in the cities of Makati, Pasig, Manila, and Quezon City, among others. Filing in the wrong court — for example, before a regular RTC branch not designated as a Special Commercial Court — is a jurisdictional defect that can result in dismissal of the petition. The petitioner must verify the current list of designated Special Commercial Courts with the Office of the Court Administrator before filing.
Article IV of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), as incorporated into Philippine law by Section 42 of Republic Act No. 9285 (ADR Act of 2004), requires specific documentary attachments. The petitioner must attach: (1) the duly authenticated original arbitral award or a duly certified copy thereof; (2) the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy; and (3) if the award or agreement is not in English or Filipino, a certified translation by a qualified translator. Authentication may be done through apostille under the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (1961) — the Philippines acceded to the Apostille Convention on May 14, 2019 (Department of Foreign Affairs DFA AO No. 002-2019). Documents from non-Hague Convention countries still require consular authentication through the Philippine Embassy or Consulate in the country of origin.
Philippine courts may refuse recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award only on the limited grounds listed in Article V of the New York Convention, as incorporated by Section 45 of Republic Act No. 9285 (ADR Act of 2004). The grounds that the respondent must prove are: (1) the parties to the arbitration agreement were under some incapacity or the agreement is invalid; (2) the respondent was not given proper notice of the arbitration or was unable to present its case; (3) the award deals with a dispute not falling within the scope of the arbitration agreement; (4) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or arbitral procedure was irregular; or (5) the award has been set aside or suspended by the court of the country of the seat. The courts may also refuse on two grounds raised ex mero motu: (6) the subject matter is not arbitrable under Philippine law; or (7) recognition or enforcement would be contrary to Philippine public policy. The Supreme Court in Korea Technologies Co. Ltd. v. Lerma (G.R. No. 143581, January 7, 2008) confirmed that Philippine courts apply these grounds narrowly to uphold the pro-enforcement policy of the New York Convention.
Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award in the Philippines through the Regional Trial Court Special Commercial Court can take anywhere from 6 months to several years, depending on whether the respondent opposes the petition. Under Rule 13 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC (Special ADR Rules), upon filing of the petition the court sets a hearing date and requires service on the respondent. If the respondent does not oppose the petition within the period set by the court, the court may grant the petition without a full hearing. If the respondent files an opposition raising one or more New York Convention grounds, the court will conduct a summary hearing. Appeals from RTC decisions on foreign arbitral award enforcement go to the Court of Appeals under Rule 19 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, and from the CA to the Supreme Court via Rule 45 of the Rules of Court on pure questions of law. Parties frequently explore voluntary compliance or negotiated settlement while the petition is pending to avoid the delays of litigation.
A Philippine company cannot file a petition to set aside a foreign arbitral award in Philippine courts — the power to set aside a foreign arbitral award lies exclusively with the courts of the country where the arbitration had its seat. Under Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention and Section 45 of Republic Act No. 9285 (ADR Act of 2004), Philippine courts may only refuse enforcement on specific limited grounds; they have no jurisdiction to annul or vacate a foreign arbitral award. The distinction is between vacating an award (exclusive to the courts of the seat country) and refusing enforcement (available in any enforcement country on New York Convention grounds). A Philippine respondent seeking to challenge a foreign arbitral award must file its set-aside petition in the courts of the seat country — for example, before the Singapore High Court for SIAC awards seated in Singapore, or before the Hong Kong Court of First Instance for HKIAC awards seated in Hong Kong — within the time limit prescribed by the law of the seat country.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Arbitration Agreement (Philippines)
A standalone Arbitration Agreement for the Philippines to submit an existing dispute to binding arbitration under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9285). Covers scope, institution choice (PDRCI, CIAC, or ad hoc), seat, number of arbitrators, language, and costs. Compliant with UNCITRAL Model Law and A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC.
Arbitration Clause (Philippines)
A standalone Arbitration Clause for insertion into Philippine contracts, compliant with the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9285) and the Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC). References PDRCI, CIAC, and ICC Manila rules for domestic and international arbitration.
Demand Letter (Philippines)
A formal Demand Letter for the Philippines requiring payment of a debt, performance of an obligation, or remedy of a breach under the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386). Puts the debtor or obligor in default (mora solvendi) and establishes the factual basis for filing suit before the Regional Trial Court or Metropolitan Trial Court.