General Release of Liability (Hong Kong)
GENERAL RELEASE OF LIABILITY
Dated: [Release Date]
Releasor: [Releasor Name], of [Releasor Address];
Releasee: [Releasee Name], of [Releasee Address].
1. RELEASE
1.1 In consideration of [Consideration], the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Releasor, for themselves and their successors, heirs, and assigns, hereby unconditionally and irrevocably releases, acquits, and forever discharges the Releasee and its directors, officers, employees, agents, and successors from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, damages, losses, costs, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, arising from or relating to: [Matter Description].
1.2 Carve-outs (claims not released): [Carve Outs].
2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
2.1 The Releasor acknowledges that they have read and understood this Release, have had the opportunity to obtain independent legal advice, and sign it voluntarily.
2.2 The Releasor acknowledges that the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) may limit the effect of this Release in relation to personal injury or death caused by negligence.
3. GOVERNING LAW
3.1 This Release is governed by the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Disputes shall be resolved in the courts of Hong Kong.
Releasor
________________
Signature
Witness
________________
Signature
What Is a General Release of Liability (Hong Kong)?
General Release of Liability in Hong Kong is a legally binding document governed by Hong Kong common law and the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) by which one party (the releasor) voluntarily and permanently gives up all claims, rights of action, and demands against another party (the releasee) arising from a specified incident, transaction, or relationship — providing the releasee with a full and final defence against future proceedings on the matters released.
A General Release of Liability operates as a contract and must satisfy the requirements of a valid contract under Hong Kong common law: offer, acceptance, consideration (or deed formality as a substitute), intention to create legal relations, and certainty of terms. Where consideration is given — typically a monetary payment, or a mutual exchange of releases — the release is a binding contract from the moment of signing. Where no consideration is paid (for example, a unilateral release by a volunteer in favour of an event organiser), the release must be executed as a deed to be enforceable.
The Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) is the critical Hong Kong statute governing the enforceability of liability exclusion clauses. Section 7 of Cap. 71 provides that a person cannot, by a contract term, exclude or restrict their liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence — such clauses are void regardless of how clearly they are drafted. For liability arising from negligence causing other types of loss (property damage, economic loss), an exclusion or limitation clause must satisfy the reasonableness test under Cap. 71, s.3. A General Release of Liability that purports to release the releasee from liability for negligently causing serious personal injury to the releasor will be void to that extent under Cap. 71, s.7.
Despite the Cap. 71 limitation on excluding personal injury liability arising from negligence, General Releases of Liability remain widely and validly used in Hong Kong in many commercial, recreational, and interpersonal contexts. Commercial contract disputes, property damage claims, consumer disputes, sports and recreational activity waivers, and business relationship terminations all make use of general release documents where the parties wish to achieve a clean break.
The Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) sets statutory time limits for bringing claims in Hong Kong: 6 years for most contract claims from the date the cause of action accrued; 6 years for most tort claims; 3 years for personal injury claims; and 12 years for claims on a deed. A General Release of Liability cuts through the limitation period question by extinguishing the underlying claim entirely, providing immediate certainty rather than waiting for the limitation period to expire.
The Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 284) is relevant where a release is obtained on the basis of false statements — a release procured by misrepresentation can be rescinded under Cap. 284, restoring the releasor's original claim. Careful drafting that accurately describes the matters being released reduces misrepresentation risk for the releasee.
The Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282) contains specific rules for compromises of employees' compensation claims — under Cap. 282, a settlement of an employees' compensation claim requires approval by the District Court before it is binding. A General Release of Liability that purports to settle an employees' compensation claim without court approval is void under Cap. 282. Employers and insurers settling work injury claims in Hong Kong must comply with this approval requirement, which protects injured workers from settling too quickly or for inadequate amounts.
When Do You Need a General Release of Liability (Hong Kong)?
General Release of Liability in Hong Kong is needed whenever one party wishes to obtain a permanent and final release from liability for claims arising from a specified incident, relationship, or set of circumstances — achieving certainty that the releasor cannot bring future proceedings on the released matters.
Sports, fitness, and recreational operators need General Releases of Liability for participants in activities involving physical risk — gym memberships, martial arts classes, rock climbing centres, adventure sports operators, and water sports companies operating in Hong Kong waters. Participants are asked to sign a release before participating. While Cap. 71 prevents exclusion of liability for death and personal injury caused by negligence, releases can validly limit liability for property damage and claims arising from inherent risks of the activity that are not caused by negligence.
Event organisers and venue operators need General Releases of Liability for attendees at events where there is a risk of property damage or minor physical contact — concerts, sports events, corporate team building activities, and community events. The release documents the participant's awareness of risks and agreement not to hold the organiser liable for non-negligent incidents.
Business operators settling disputes with customers or suppliers need a General Release to document the settlement and confirm the other party cannot reopen the dispute. Retailer–supplier disputes, service provider–client disputes, and landlord–tenant disputes resolved informally all benefit from a written release that evidences the parties' agreement to settle and provides a defence if the other party later seeks to revive the claim.
Landlords and tenants at the end of a tenancy agreement sometimes execute a mutual General Release to confirm that each party has no outstanding claims against the other — the tenant returns possession, the landlord returns the deposit, and both parties release each other from all claims arising from the tenancy. The Lands Tribunal in Hong Kong sees significant volumes of post-tenancy deposit disputes, and a properly executed release resolves these definitively.
Insurance claims resolved by direct payment between the insured and a third party claimant require a General Release to confirm the claimant cannot pursue the insured again after accepting payment. The insurer typically requires a signed release before authorising settlement payment.
Employment terminations by mutual agreement — as distinct from dismissal — benefit from a General Release (carefully drafted to preserve non-waivable rights under the Employment Ordinance Cap. 57) to provide the employer with certainty that the employee will not bring a subsequent claim for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, or statutory entitlements beyond those addressed in the settlement.
What to Include in Your General Release of Liability (Hong Kong)
General Release of Liability in Hong Kong should include the following essential elements to be legally effective, Cap. 71 compliant, and capable of withstanding a challenge in the Hong Kong courts.
Parties: Full legal names and HKID numbers (for individuals) or company registration numbers (for companies) of the releasor (the party giving up claims) and the releasee (the party being released from liability). Where both parties are releasing each other, both are identified as releasor and releasee in their respective directions.
Background Description: A concise factual description of the incident, transaction, dispute, or relationship from which the released claims arise. Precision in the background description defines the scope of the release and prevents disputes about what was and was not intended to be released. For example: 'arising from the tenancy of [Property] under the Tenancy Agreement dated [date]' or 'arising from the road traffic accident on [date] at [location] in Hong Kong'.
Scope of Release: A clear statement of the claims, demands, actions, costs, and liabilities being released — whether all claims whatsoever arising from the described circumstances (broad release) or specified categories of claims (limited release). The release should state whether known claims only are released or whether unknown future claims arising from the described circumstances are also included. Hong Kong courts give effect to broad release language where the parties clearly intended full finality.
Cap. 71 Carve-out: An acknowledgment that nothing in the release excludes liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence, consistent with s.7 of the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71). Including this carve-out prevents the release from being challenged as void in its entirety on Cap. 71 grounds, and limits the invalidity to the specific provision that Cap. 71 renders void.
Consideration: The monetary payment or other consideration given in exchange for the release, or confirmation that the release is mutual (each party's release of the other is the consideration). Without consideration, a release must be executed as a deed. Where consideration is paid, the amount in HKD should be stated. Hong Kong has no GST or VAT on settlement payments.
Representation by Releasor: A representation by the releasor that they have not assigned any of the released claims to a third party, that they are the sole owner of the claims being released, and that they have had the opportunity to seek independent legal advice before signing. This representation protects the releasee against claims by assignees or co-claimants not party to the release.
Confidentiality: If appropriate, mutual confidentiality obligations covering the existence and terms of the settlement. Commercial settlements in Hong Kong frequently include confidentiality provisions protecting both parties' reputations and preventing disclosure of settlement amounts.
Execution as Deed (if no consideration): If no monetary consideration is being exchanged, the release must be executed as a deed — expressed on its face to be a deed, signed by the executing party, witnessed by an independent adult, and delivered as a deed. The attestation clause must confirm deed execution.
Governing Law: The laws of the Hong Kong SAR govern the release, with disputes referred to the Hong Kong courts — the Court of First Instance, District Court, or Small Claims Tribunal (up to HK$75,000) depending on the amount involved. Alternative dispute resolution through the Hong Kong Mediation Centre or HKIAC mediation is appropriate for commercial releases where the parties have an ongoing relationship. Forms-legal.com provides a General Release of Liability template for Hong Kong incorporating Cap. 71 compliant drafting and suitable for commercial, recreational, and personal dispute resolution contexts.
Sources & Citations
Statutory citations link to official government sources.
- Hong Kong common law and the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71)HK official
- The Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71)HK official
- The Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347)HK official
- The Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 284)HK official
- The Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282)HK official
- Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71)HK official
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). General Release of Liability (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-liability-hong-kong
"General Release of Liability (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-liability-hong-kong.
@misc{formslegal-general-release-liability-hong-kong,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {General Release of Liability (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-liability-hong-kong}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71)}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Liability releases between commercial parties and between adults acting freely are generally enforceable in Hong Kong under common law, subject to important limitations imposed by the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) and public policy considerations developed by the Hong Kong courts. The most significant limitation is in s.7 of Cap. 71, which provides that a person cannot by a contract term exclude or restrict their liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence. Any release provision that purports to release a party from liability for negligently causing death or personal injury to the releasor is void and of no effect — regardless of how clearly it is drafted or how prominently it is displayed. This limitation cannot be contracted out of and applies to all types of agreements including releases and waivers signed by participants in recreational and sporting activities. For other types of loss — property damage, economic loss, and financial harm — a release or exclusion clause is subject to the reasonableness test under s.3 of Cap. 71. Under the reasonableness test, the court considers whether the release term was fair and reasonable having regard to the circumstances at the time the release was signed.
A General Release and an indemnity are both risk-management legal instruments used in Hong Kong commercial and personal contexts, but they operate in fundamentally different ways and serve different purposes. A General Release is a backward-looking instrument — it releases a party from liability for claims that have already arisen, or that may arise from specified past events or circumstances. Once a General Release is signed, the releasing party cannot bring claims against the released party in respect of the matters covered by the release. A release extinguishes existing rights — it is a permanent bar to future proceedings on the released matters. The consideration for a release is typically a payment in settlement of the released claims, or a mutual exchange of releases. An indemnity is a forward-looking instrument — one party (the indemnifying party) promises to compensate the other party (the indemnified party) for losses, costs, or liabilities that may arise in the future from specified events or activities. An indemnity does not release existing claims; it creates a new obligation to make good future losses. For example, a contractor gives an indemnity to a property owner against third-party claims arising from the construction works — if a third party is injured and sues the property owner, the contractor must compensate the owner for any judgment or settlement costs. The indemnity runs alongside the primary activity and provides a financial remedy if loss occurs.
Waivers and liability releases signed by participants at events, sporting activities, gyms, adventure parks, and recreational facilities in Hong Kong are commonly used and are partially enforceable — but with important limitations imposed by the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) and Hong Kong common law. The fundamental limitation: no waiver can release a company or individual from liability for death or personal injury caused by their own negligence. Section 7 of Cap. 71 is absolute — any waiver term purporting to exclude or restrict liability for negligently caused death or personal injury is void. A participant at a rock climbing centre, martial arts class, or water sports operator who suffers serious injury due to the operator's negligence — faulty equipment, inadequate safety briefings, negligent supervision — retains the right to claim compensation in the Hong Kong courts regardless of any waiver they signed. Prominently displayed signs saying 'participate at own risk' or 'no liability accepted for injury' do not override Cap. 71.
Consideration is a fundamental requirement for a General Release of Liability to be enforceable as a contract under Hong Kong common law. Without consideration (or deed execution as a substitute), a release is a gratuitous promise that is not binding on the releasing party — they can simply change their mind and bring the claims they purported to release. Monetary consideration is the most common and clearest form of consideration in a Hong Kong release. The released party pays a sum of money in HKD in exchange for the releasing party's agreement to give up their claims. The amount of consideration should be genuine — courts will scrutinise nominal consideration (for example, HK$1) in some contexts, particularly where the release involves the waiver of substantial rights. Hong Kong has no GST or VAT on settlement payments, so the agreed sum is the all-inclusive settlement amount. Mutual release as consideration: Where both parties release each other simultaneously, the consideration for each party's release is the other party's reciprocal release of their claims. This mutual exchange of releases — each party giving up something of value (their claims) in exchange for the other doing the same — satisfies the consideration requirement without any monetary payment. Mutual releases are common in commercial settlement agreements and in business relationship terminations.
Certain categories of claims cannot be validly released under a General Release of Liability in Hong Kong, regardless of how clearly the release is drafted or what consideration is paid. Understanding these non-releasable categories is essential for drafting an effective release that does not inadvertently create an unenforceable document. Death and personal injury from negligence: Section 7 of the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) provides that liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence cannot be excluded or restricted by any contract term. A release purporting to cover negligently caused death or personal injury is void to that extent. This limitation applies regardless of whether the release is between commercial parties or between a business and a consumer. Non-waivable statutory employment rights: Under s.70 of the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), any agreement that purports to exclude or limit the operation of any provision of Cap. 57, or to preclude any person from exercising a right conferred by Cap. 57, is void. Non-waivable rights include: wages already accrued and earned; statutory minimum notice pay; statutory annual leave pay accrued; maternity leave pay (s.15 of Cap. 57); paternity leave pay; severance payment and long service payment entitlements that have accrued. An employment release that purports to waive these rights is void to that extent — the waiver provision is struck out but the rest of the release remains effective.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Waiver of Liability (Hong Kong)
A liability waiver for use by Hong Kong businesses, sports clubs, and event organisers, by which participants acknowledge risks and release the organiser from liability. Subject to the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71).
Hold Harmless Agreement (Hong Kong)
A Hong Kong hold harmless (indemnity) agreement by which one party agrees to indemnify and protect another from claims, losses, and liabilities arising from a specified activity or relationship. Subject to the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71).
Event Participation Waiver (Hong Kong)
A liability waiver for participants in Hong Kong events, sports competitions, charity runs, and organised activities. Participants acknowledge risks and release the event organiser from liability, subject to the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71).