General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong)
GENERAL RELEASE AND WAIVER
Date: [Release Date]
Releasing Party: [Releasing Party Name] (HKID/CRN: [Releasing Party HKID]) of [Releasing Party Address] (“the Releasing Party”);
Released Party: [Released Party Name] (HKID/CRN: [Released Party HKID]) of [Released Party Address] (“the Released Party”).
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 The following dispute or circumstances have arisen between the parties: [Dispute Description]
1.2 The parties have agreed to resolve all matters between them on the terms set out in this Release.
1.3 This Release is: [Release Type].
2. CONSIDERATION
2.1 In consideration of [Consideration Type]: [Consideration Amount] [Other Consideration], the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Releasing Party agrees to the release set out in this Agreement.
3. RELEASE
3.1 The Releasing Party hereby fully, finally, and unconditionally releases and discharges the Released Party from: [Claims Description]
3.2 This Release is in full and final settlement of all claims described above. The Releasing Party shall not bring any further action, claim, demand, or proceeding against the Released Party in respect of the matters released herein, whether in the courts of Hong Kong, in arbitration, or otherwise.
3.3 The Releasing Party confirms that it has not assigned any of the released claims to any third party.
3.4 Statutory rights: Nothing in this Release purports to waive any rights under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) that cannot by law be waived or excluded by contract, including the right to wages already earned.
4. CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISPARAGEMENT
4.1 Confidentiality: [Confidentiality Clause]. If agreed, the parties shall keep the existence and terms of this Release strictly confidential and shall not disclose the same to any third party without the other party’s prior written consent, except as required by law.
4.2 Non-disparagement: [Non Disparagement]. If agreed, neither party shall make any negative, disparaging, or derogatory public statements about the other party in connection with the matters the subject of this Release.
5. GENERAL
5.1 This Release is governed by the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.
5.2 The parties confirm that they have had the opportunity to seek independent legal advice before signing this Release.
5.3 This Release constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the settlement of the matters described herein.
Releasing Party
________________
Signature
Released Party
________________
Signature
What Is a General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong)?
General Release and Waiver in Hong Kong is a legally binding agreement governed by Hong Kong contract law and the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) by which one or more parties (the releasing parties) permanently discharge another party (the released party) from all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, liabilities, costs, and obligations arising from a specified dispute, transaction, or set of circumstances — providing immediate finality without waiting for limitation periods to expire.
A release in Hong Kong is a contract and must satisfy the requirements of a valid contract under Hong Kong common law: offer, acceptance, consideration (or deed execution as a substitute), intention to create legal relations, and certainty of terms. Consideration in the context of a release takes several forms — most commonly a monetary payment in exchange for the releasing party's agreement to give up their claims, or a mutual release where each party's release of the other constitutes the consideration. A unilateral release with no consideration must be executed as a deed to be enforceable.
The Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) sets the statutory time limits within which claims must be brought in Hong Kong — 6 years for most contract and tort claims from the date the cause of action accrued; 3 years for personal injury claims; and 12 years for claims on a deed. A General Release cuts through the limitation period question entirely by extinguishing the underlying claim from the date of the release, providing immediate and permanent finality rather than relying on the passage of time.
Releases are used across multiple distinct contexts in Hong Kong: commercial disputes between businesses resolved by negotiation; employment disputes settled as part of a mutual termination agreement documented under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57); personal injury claims resolved by insurance payment or direct negotiation; landlord and tenant disputes resolved outside the Lands Tribunal; financial disputes between lending and borrowing parties including promissory note settlements; and clean-break provisions in business sales, share purchases, and corporate restructurings. HKIAC arbitration settlements commonly include a mutual release as part of the settlement agreement.
For employment-related releases, the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) provides mandatory protections that cannot be waived by contract under any circumstances. These non-waivable rights include the right to wages already earned and accrued, the right to statutory minimum notice pay where the employment is being terminated, statutory annual leave pay accrued but not taken, and maternity or paternity leave pay entitlements. An employment settlement release that purports to waive these rights is void to that extent under s.70 of Cap. 57 — the waiver provision is struck out but the rest of the release remains effective. The Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 284) is relevant where a release is obtained by misrepresentation — such a release can be rescinded, restoring the releasing party's original claims.
Hong Kong courts interpret General Releases strictly and apply the principle of contra proferentem — construing ambiguity against the party seeking to rely on the release. A release of 'all claims whatsoever' is given broad effect where the language is clear and the parties clearly intended finality, but courts will not extend the scope of a release beyond what the parties actually agreed. The Court of Final Appeal and Court of First Instance have developed a sophisticated body of case law on the construction of release provisions that practitioners drafting releases in Hong Kong must consider.
When Do You Need a General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong)?
General Release and Waiver in Hong Kong is needed whenever parties wish to achieve a full and final resolution of a dispute, potential claim, or completed transaction — confirming no possibility of future litigation on the matters covered and providing both parties with certainty and a clean break.
Commercial disputes between businesses are the most common trigger for a General Release in Hong Kong. When two companies have a dispute over a contract, a delivery failure, a quality issue, a payment disagreement, or a service failure, a negotiated settlement documented by a General Release — with or without a monetary payment — provides certainty that the matter is resolved and neither party can later reopen the dispute in the Hong Kong courts or in HKIAC arbitration. Given the cost and time involved in Hong Kong litigation and arbitration, parties frequently prefer a documented settlement over continued proceedings.
Employment terminations by mutual agreement — particularly where there are potential claims under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) for unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, breach of contract, or unpaid statutory entitlements — require a settlement agreement incorporating a General Release. The release must be carefully drafted to preserve the employee's non-waivable statutory rights while releasing all contractual and common law claims. The Labour Tribunal encourages settlement of employment disputes, and a General Release executed as part of a mediated or negotiated settlement before the Tribunal provides a procedural bar against revival of the released claims.
Property transaction clean-ups in Hong Kong commonly involve a mutual General Release when the parties wish to confirm at or after completion that neither has any residual claims against the other arising from the transaction. In complex commercial property transactions involving multiple parties — vendor, purchaser, lessee, bank — mutual releases among all parties are often included in the completion documentation.
Personal injury incidents — road traffic accidents, slips and falls, workplace accidents — that are resolved by direct negotiation between the injured party and the insurer or responsible party require a General Release to evidence the final settlement and prevent the claimant from bringing a further claim. Insurers in Hong Kong routinely require a signed release before authorising settlement payment. Note that under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282), compromises of employees' compensation claims require court approval.
Landlord and tenant disputes in Hong Kong — deposit refund disputes, dilapidations claims, rent arrears, and illegal subletting disputes — that are resolved informally or through the Lands Tribunal's mediation service benefit from a General Release confirming the agreed settlement terms and preventing revival of the dispute. The Lands Tribunal has jurisdiction over residential and commercial tenancy disputes under the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7).
Business relationship terminations — when a distribution agreement, agency agreement, service agreement, or partnership arrangement comes to an end — frequently involve a mutual General Release confirming that both parties have fulfilled their obligations and neither has outstanding claims against the other. This clean break documentation is particularly important where the relationship involved ongoing obligations, shared assets, or intellectual property licences.
What to Include in Your General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong)
General Release and Waiver in Hong Kong should include the following essential elements to be legally effective, enforceable in the Hong Kong courts, and sufficient to provide the finality the parties intend.
Parties: Full legal names and HKID numbers (for individuals) or Hong Kong Companies Registry registration numbers (for companies) of all releasing parties and all released parties. In a mutual release, each party is both a releasing party and a released party. Related entities — subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, and employees of corporate parties — should be expressly included in the release if the parties intend them to be covered, as courts do not automatically extend releases to unnamed related parties.
Background and Context: A concise but precise description of the dispute, transaction, relationship, or circumstances from which the released claims arise. Precision in the background section defines the scope of the release and prevents disputes about what was and was not intended to be released. For example: 'arising from the Commercial Lease Agreement dated [date] for the premises at [address]' or 'arising from the employment relationship between [employer] and [employee] which terminated on [date]'.
Scope of Release: A clear statement of what claims, demands, actions, causes of action, liabilities, losses, costs, and obligations are being released — whether expressed broadly ('all claims, demands, actions, and liabilities whatsoever and howsoever arising from the circumstances described, whether known or unknown, past, present, or future') or limited to specified identified claims. The release should state expressly whether it covers only known claims or also unknown future claims arising from the described circumstances. Hong Kong courts give effect to broadly expressed releases where the parties' intention to achieve complete finality is clear.
Consideration: The monetary payment in HKD or other consideration given in exchange for the release (no GST or VAT applies to settlement payments in Hong Kong); or confirmation that the release is mutual and each party's release of the other constitutes the consideration. Where no consideration passes (unilateral release), the release must be executed as a deed — signed, witnessed, and delivered as a deed — with the document expressing on its face that it is executed as a deed.
Employment Statutory Rights Carve-out: For employment-related releases, an express carve-out preserving the employee's non-waivable statutory rights under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), including accrued wages, statutory notice pay, statutory annual leave pay, and any Long Service Payment or Severance Payment entitlements that have accrued. Any provision purporting to waive these rights is void under s.70 of Cap. 57.
No Prior Assignment: A representation by each releasing party that they have not assigned, transferred, or encumbered any of the released claims to any third party, and that they are the sole owner of the claims being released. This representation protects the released party against claims by assignees or co-claimants not party to the release.
Independent Legal Advice: A representation that the releasing party has had the opportunity to obtain independent legal advice before signing the release. This representation supports the enforceability of the release by reducing the risk of a challenge based on unconscionability, undue influence, or failure to understand the nature of the document.
Confidentiality: If appropriate, mutual confidentiality obligations covering the fact and terms of the settlement — preventing either party from disclosing the settlement amount or terms to third parties. Commercial settlements in Hong Kong frequently include confidentiality provisions to protect both parties' commercial reputations.
Governing Law and Disputes: Laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region govern the release, with disputes to be resolved by the Hong Kong courts — Court of First Instance, District Court, or Small Claims Tribunal depending on the amount in dispute. Forms-legal.com provides a General Release and Waiver template for Hong Kong covering both mutual and unilateral release scenarios, with employment statutory rights carve-out provisions.
Statutory Cross-References: Section 4 of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) sets the six-year limitation period for simple contract claims, while Section 17 of Cap. 347 covers tort claims. Section 32 of the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) governs terminal payments on termination of employment, and Section 70 of Cap. 57 prohibits contracting out of statutory employment rights — a general release cannot extinguish statutory MPF contributions owed under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485). Section 5 of the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71) tests the reasonableness of clauses excluding liability for negligence causing personal injury. Section 2 of the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 23) governs consideration requirements for release agreements. The Labour Tribunal Ordinance (Cap. 25) governs employment claims, and a release of employment claims requires specific wording to be effective before the Labour Tribunal. Section 20 of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486) requires that personal data collected during dispute proceedings be deleted once the legal purpose is fulfilled. The Inland Revenue Department (IRD) treats ex-gratia payments accompanying releases differently from salary under Section 8 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112) — amounts for injury to feelings and personal injury are typically not chargeable to salaries tax.
Sources & Citations
Statutory citations link to official government sources.
- Hong Kong contract law and the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347)HK official
- The Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347)HK official
- Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
- For employment-related releases, the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
- The Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 284)HK official
- Note that under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282)HK official
- Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7)HK official
- Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347)HK official
- MPF contributions owed under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485)HK official
- Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71)HK official
- Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 23)HK official
- The Labour Tribunal Ordinance (Cap. 25)HK official
- Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486)HK official
- Inland Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112)HK official
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-hong-kong
"General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-hong-kong.
@misc{formslegal-general-release-hong-kong,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {General Release and Waiver (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/personal/releases/general-release-hong-kong}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347)}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
A General Release of Claims in Hong Kong is valid and enforceable when it satisfies the requirements of a valid contract under Hong Kong common law and is not caught by any statutory or public policy grounds for invalidity. The foundational requirements are: (1) offer and acceptance — one party proposes the release on specified terms and the other party accepts; (2) consideration — something of value passes from the released party to the releasing party (typically a monetary payment), or the release is mutual (each party's release of the other is the consideration), or the release is executed as a deed (which substitutes for consideration); (3) intention to create legal relations — both parties intend the release to be legally binding, not merely a moral or social arrangement; and (4) certainty of terms — the scope of the release is sufficiently certain to be given effect. For a release executed as a deed — where no consideration passes — the deed must be in writing, expressed on its face as a deed, signed by the executing party, witnessed by an independent adult who attests the signature, and delivered as a deed (the executing party must intend to be bound by it from delivery). A release may be unenforceable despite meeting these formal requirements in several circumstances: (a) if it was obtained by misrepresentation, duress, or undue influence — all of which are grounds to rescind the release under Hong Kong common law and the Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap.
A General Release of Claims is a legally binding agreement under Hong Kong contract law by which one or more parties (the releasing parties) agree to discharge and release another party (the released party) from all claims, demands, actions, liabilities, and obligations arising from a specified dispute, transaction, or set of circumstances. A mutual release involves all parties releasing each other simultaneously. In Hong Kong, a release is a contract and must satisfy the requirements of a valid contract under Hong Kong common law: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, and certainty of terms. Consideration is typically either a monetary payment in exchange for the release, or (in a mutual release) the reciprocal giving up of claims by each party. A release executed under Hong Kong law has the effect of extinguishing the claims covered by its terms — the releasing party is permanently barred from bringing those claims in the Hong Kong courts or in arbitration. This finality is the primary purpose of a release: to achieve a clean break and certainty that no further claims will arise from the matters covered. The Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) is relevant context: the ordinary limitation period for contract claims in Hong Kong is 6 years from the date the cause of action accrued, and for tort claims is generally also 6 years (with special rules for personal injury and latent damage claims).
Yes. Under Hong Kong contract law — which follows English common law — consideration is required to make a release enforceable unless the release is executed as a deed. This requirement flows from the fundamental principle that a contract (including a release agreement) must be supported by consideration to be binding. Consideration in the context of a release can take several forms. A monetary payment is the most common form — the released party pays a sum of money in exchange for the releasing party's agreement to give up their claims. Even a nominal amount of consideration (e.g., HK$100) can theoretically be sufficient, but Hong Kong courts look for genuine rather than sham consideration. A mutual release — where each party releases the other — is its own consideration: each party's giving up of their claims is the consideration for the other party's release. If no monetary consideration is being paid and the release is not mutual, a release must be executed as a deed to be enforceable without consideration. A deed does not require consideration — the formality of deed execution substitutes for consideration. Under Hong Kong law, a deed must be: in writing; signed by the executing party; witnessed by an independent adult witness who attests the signature; and delivered as a deed (i.e., the executing party must clearly intend to be bound by it from the date of delivery). The document should be expressed on its face to be a deed ('This Deed of Release') and the attestation clause should confirm it is executed as a deed.
A general release may be challenged in Hong Kong courts on several grounds, and parties should be aware of the circumstances in which a release may be set aside or its scope limited. Misrepresentation: If the released party made a false statement of fact that induced the releasing party to enter into the release, the releasing party may apply to set aside the release for misrepresentation under the Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 284) or under common law. The release can be rescinded and the releasing party may claim damages. Duress: A release obtained by threats or illegitimate pressure — including economic duress (threatening to breach a contract unless a settlement is agreed on unfavourable terms) — can be set aside in Hong Kong courts. The courts have developed the doctrine of economic duress from English authorities and apply it to commercial contexts. Undue influence: A release obtained by a person in a position of trust or authority over the releasing party through undue influence can be set aside. This is particularly relevant in family or relationship contexts where one party had significant influence over another. Non est factum: In rare cases, a party may argue that they did not understand the nature of the document they signed — for example, because of mental incapacity at the time or because the document was fundamentally different in nature from what was represented to them. This defence is narrowly construed by Hong Kong courts. Statutory rights: A release cannot waive non-waivable statutory rights. Under the Employment Ordinance (Cap.
Whether a General Release covers unknown future claims in Hong Kong depends on the drafting of the release and the circumstances of the parties at the time it was signed. Hong Kong courts — following English common law authorities — approach this question by construing the language of the release in context. A release of 'all claims whatsoever, whether known or unknown, past, present, or future' is broad language and can, if the parties genuinely intended finality across all possible claims arising from the specified circumstances, be given effect by a Hong Kong court to cover claims that were not contemplated at the time of signing. The courts look at whether the parties, with full knowledge of the circumstances, intended to achieve complete finality. However, the courts apply the principle of contra proferentem (construing ambiguity against the drafter) and the general rule that a party cannot easily give up rights of which they are unaware unless the language is unambiguous. The leading English authority Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali [2001] UKHL 8 — which held that general words in a release do not extinguish rights that the parties could not have contemplated at the time — has been applied and considered in Hong Kong proceedings.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Employment Contract (Hong Kong)
A comprehensive employment agreement for Hong Kong employees compliant with the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) and the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485). Covers continuous contract status, MPF contributions, statutory leave entitlements, notice periods, severance, and termination provisions.
Independent Contractor Agreement (Hong Kong)
An agreement for engaging an independent contractor or freelancer in Hong Kong under common law, clearly establishing the contractor relationship as distinct from employment under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57). Covers scope of services, fees, intellectual property, confidentiality, and tax responsibilities under the Inland Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112).
Service Agreement (Hong Kong)
A general service agreement governing the provision of services between a service provider and client under Hong Kong law, including the Supply of Services (Implied Terms) Ordinance (Cap. 457) and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486). Suitable for professional, technology, creative, and commercial service engagements. No GST or VAT applies in Hong Kong. HKIAC arbitration clause included.
Promissory Note (Hong Kong)
An unconditional written promise to pay a fixed sum in HKD under the Bills of Exchange Ordinance (Cap. 19) of Hong Kong. Used for personal and commercial lending between private parties, intercompany loans, and short-term financing arrangements. No GST or VAT in Hong Kong.
General Release of Liability (Hong Kong)
A general release by which one party releases another from all claims and liability arising from a specified incident or relationship. Enforceable under Hong Kong common law, subject to the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 71).