Right of First Refusal (Philippines)
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AGREEMENT
Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386) | Property Registration Decree (PD 1529)
This RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of [Date]
BETWEEN:
(1) [Grantor Name], of [Grantor Address] (hereinafter "Grantor"); AND
(2) [Rightholder Name], of [Rightholder Address] (hereinafter "Rightholder").
1. GRANT OF RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
1.1 In consideration of [Consideration], the Grantor hereby grants to the Rightholder the right of first refusal ("ROFR") to purchase the following property ("Property"): [Property Description], covered by [TCT/CCT Number].
1.2 The ROFR gives the Rightholder the priority right to purchase the Property on the same price and terms offered to any bona fide third-party buyer, before the Grantor accepts any such offer. The ROFR is not a present right to purchase — it is triggered only when the Grantor receives a qualifying third-party offer or decides to sell.
2. TRIGGER EVENT AND NOTIFICATION
2.1 The ROFR is triggered when the Grantor: (a) receives a bona fide written offer from a third party to purchase the Property; or (b) decides to sell the Property and establishes a sale price and terms.
2.2 Upon the trigger event, the Grantor shall within five (5) days give written notice to the Rightholder stating the offered price, payment terms, and all material conditions of the proposed sale ("ROFR Notice").
2.3 The Grantor's failure to give the ROFR Notice shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement, entitling the Rightholder to seek rescission of any sale made in violation and damages under Civil Code Articles 1191 and 1311, consistent with Equatorial Realty Development Inc. v. Mayfair Theater Inc. (G.R. No. 106063, November 21, 1996).
3. EXERCISE OF ROFR
3.1 The Rightholder shall have [Response Period] from receipt of the ROFR Notice to exercise the ROFR by delivering written notice to the Grantor confirming the Rightholder's acceptance of the offered price and terms ("Exercise Notice").
3.2 The Rightholder must match the exact price and terms stated in the ROFR Notice — the Rightholder may not demand different or more favorable terms.
3.3 If the Rightholder does not deliver the Exercise Notice within the [Response Period] period, the Grantor is free to sell the Property to the third party at the same or higher price, and on terms no more favorable than those stated in the ROFR Notice, without further obligation to the Rightholder.
4. DURATION
4.1 This ROFR shall remain in effect for: [ROFR Duration].
5. ANNOTATION ON TITLE
5.1 The Rightholder may have this Agreement annotated on [TCT/CCT Number] at the Register of Deeds under PD 1529 to bind subsequent purchasers. The costs of annotation shall be borne by the Rightholder.
6. GOVERNING LAW
6.1 This Agreement is governed by the laws of the Republic of the Philippines, including the Civil Code (RA 386).
Grantor (Owner)
________________
Signature
Rightholder
________________
Signature
What Is a Right of First Refusal (Philippines)?
A Right of First Refusal in the Philippines documents the agreed terms between the parties and creates a written record that can be relied on if a dispute arises.
The Supreme Court of the Philippines has extensively litigated ROFR disputes. In Ang Yu Asuncion v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 109125, December 2, 1994), the Court held that a right of first refusal, being a personal right and not a real right over property, does not bind third parties who are not privy to the agreement. However, in Equatorial Realty Development Inc. v. Mayfair Theater Inc. (G.R. No. 106063, November 21, 1996), the Supreme Court held that a lessor who sold property to a third party in violation of the lessee's ROFR was liable to the lessee for rescission of the sale and damages. This landmark ruling established that when a ROFR is embedded in a lease agreement, its violation is a breach of contract actionable before the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
A ROFR in the Philippines must be clearly worded to specify the trigger event (decision to sell, receipt of a bona fide offer), the notification mechanism, the response period, and the matching terms. Philippine courts will strictly construe ROFR clauses and will not imply rights beyond what is expressly stated. For real property, the ROFR should be annotated on the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) at the Register of Deeds under Presidential Decree 1529 to bind subsequent buyers.
The legal framework governing the Right of First Refusal (Philippines) in Philippines draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Parties executing a Right of First Refusal (Philippines) in Philippines should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Property Registration Decree (PD 1529) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Right of First Refusal (Philippines)?
A Right of First Refusal Philippines is needed when a party wants priority rights to acquire property before external buyers or lessees can compete.
Lease agreements with purchase option: Commercial tenants in retail or office spaces in Makati, Quezon City, or Cebu who have made significant leasehold improvements embed ROFR clauses in their lease agreements — so that if the landlord decides to sell the building, the tenant has the right to purchase at the offered price before a third-party buyer can close the deal.
Co-ownership of property: Where two or more persons co-own a property under Article 493 of the Civil Code, each co-owner already holds a statutory pre-emptive right under Article 1623 (for personal property sales). A ROFR agreement formalizes and extends this right to real property co-ownership situations.
Shareholder agreements with real estate assets: Shareholders of a corporation holding real estate in Metro Manila or Cebu use ROFR clauses in their Shareholders Agreement, requiring that any shareholder who wishes to sell shares must first offer them to existing shareholders at the same terms — indirectly protecting each shareholder's proportional interest in the corporate real estate.
Family property arrangements: Filipino families with inherited property under the Civil Code's intestate succession rules use ROFR agreements to confirm that property stays within the family — any heir wishing to sell their undivided share must offer it to the other heirs first.
Joint venture real estate projects: Real estate joint venture partners in projects registered with DHSUD (formerly HLURB) include ROFR provisions in their joint venture agreements to prevent unwanted third parties from acquiring a partner's interest in the project.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Right of First Refusal (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Right of First Refusal (Philippines)
A valid Philippines Right of First Refusal agreement must include the following essential elements.
Parties: Full legal names and addresses of the property owner (grantor) and the rightholder (grantee). For corporations, SEC registration number and authorized signatory.
Property Description: Precise description of the property covered by the ROFR, including TCT/CCT number, lot area, location, and barangay, city/municipality.
Trigger Event: The specific event that activates the ROFR — commonly the owner's receipt of a bona fide third-party offer, or the owner's decision to sell or lease. The trigger must be precisely defined to avoid disputes.
Notification Obligation: The owner's duty to notify the rightholder in writing of the offer terms — price, payment terms, and conditions — upon receiving a qualifying third-party offer or deciding to sell. Failure to notify is the most common basis for ROFR litigation under Philippine jurisprudence.
Response Period: The time within which the rightholder must exercise the ROFR — typically 15 to 30 days from receipt of the notice. The Supreme Court in Equatorial Realty v. Mayfair Theater held that the response period must be reasonable.
Matching Terms: The rightholder's right to purchase on terms no less favorable than the third-party offer. The rightholder cannot demand better terms than offered to the third party.
Expiry: The duration of the ROFR — whether it is perpetual, tied to a lease term, or limited to a specific period. Many Philippine ROFRs are embedded in lease agreements and expire when the lease terminates.
Annotation on Title: For real property, the ROFR should be annotated on the TCT/CCT at the Register of Deeds under PD 1529 to bind third-party buyers with constructive notice. Annotation requires the notarized ROFR agreement, the owner's duplicate title, and payment of registration fees at the applicable Register of Deeds.
Consideration: Whether the ROFR is granted gratuitously or for stated consideration — Philippine courts look to the existence of consideration in assessing enforceability of the ROFR as a binding contractual obligation under the Civil Code (RA 386). The forms-legal.com Right of First Refusal (Philippines) template incorporates all elements required under the Civil Code and PD 1529 for a legally enforceable preemptive right.
Additional compliance elements for a Right of First Refusal (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Right of First Refusal (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/real-estate/purchase-sale/right-of-first-refusal-philippines
"Right of First Refusal (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/real-estate/purchase-sale/right-of-first-refusal-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-right-of-first-refusal-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Right of First Refusal (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/real-estate/purchase-sale/right-of-first-refusal-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Property Registration Decree (PD 1529)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Under the principle established in Ang Yu Asuncion v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 109125, December 2, 1994), a Right of First Refusal is a personal right that, as a general rule, does not bind third parties who are not privy to the ROFR agreement. However, in Equatorial Realty Development Inc. v. Mayfair Theater Inc. (G.R. No. 106063, November 21, 1996), the Supreme Court held that the sale by a lessor to a third party in violation of a ROFR embedded in a lease agreement was rescissible because the third party buyer had notice of the ROFR. To bind third parties definitively under the Torrens system, the ROFR should be annotated on the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) at the Register of Deeds under Presidential Decree 1529. An annotated ROFR puts all subsequent buyers on constructive notice, making it enforceable against them.
A Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and an Option to Purchase are fundamentally different in how the right to buy is triggered. An Option to Purchase under Civil Code Article 1479 gives the buyer the present, unconditional right to buy the property at any time within the option period — the buyer can exercise the option unilaterally without waiting for any external event. A ROFR, by contrast, gives the rightholder a conditional priority right: the right to buy arises only when the owner decides to sell or receives an offer from a third party. The rightholder must then match the terms offered to the third party. The Supreme Court noted in Ang Yu Asuncion v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 109125, 1994) that a ROFR does not vest a present enforceable right to compel a sale — it merely requires the grantor to offer the rightholder the first opportunity to buy when and if a sale is contemplated.
Yes. A Right of First Refusal covering real property in the Philippines can be annotated on the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) or Condominium Certificate of Title (CCT) at the Register of Deeds under the Property Registration Decree (Presidential Decree 1529). Annotation requires the submission of the notarized ROFR agreement, the owner's duplicate title, and payment of the applicable registration fees. Once annotated, the ROFR appears on the title's encumbrances section, putting all subsequent buyers and mortgagees on constructive notice of the preemptive right under the Torrens system. The Supreme Court in Equatorial Realty Development Inc. v. Mayfair Theater Inc. (G.R. No. 106063, November 21, 1996) held that a sale to a third party in violation of a ROFR known to the buyer is rescissible. Annotation eliminates any argument that the buyer lacked notice. For ROFR clauses embedded in commercial lease agreements, the lease itself may be registered at the Register of Deeds under Section 52 of PD 1529, providing indirect annotation of the ROFR. For ROFRs on properties covered by condominium certificates under RA 4726 (Condominium Act), annotation at the Register of Deeds serving the project's location is similarly available.
When a grantor violates a Right of First Refusal in the Philippines by selling or leasing the property to a third party without giving the rightholder the required notice and opportunity to match, the rightholder may pursue several remedies under the Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386) and applicable Supreme Court jurisprudence. The primary remedy is an action for rescission of the sale to the third party under Article 1381 of the Civil Code — available particularly where the third-party buyer had notice of the ROFR, as established in Equatorial Realty v. Mayfair Theater. Where rescission is not possible (e.g., because the third party is an innocent purchaser for value without notice of the ROFR), the rightholder may claim damages against the grantor under Article 1170 of the Civil Code for breach of the contractual obligation. In Ang Yu Asuncion v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 109125, 1994), the Supreme Court clarified that a ROFR rightholder whose right is violated cannot compel specific performance in the form of a forced sale — the remedy is damages from the grantor, not acquisition of the property against the third-party buyer's will. Cases are filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) with jurisdiction over the location of the property or the principal place of business of the parties, with appeals to the Court of Appeals and ultimately the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Option to Purchase (Philippines)
An Option to Purchase agreement for the Philippines giving the buyer the exclusive right to buy real property within a specified period at an agreed price. Governed by Civil Code Arts. 1479 and 1324. Option money is separate from earnest money and is not automatically part of the purchase price.
Property Management Agreement (Philippines)
A Property Management Agreement for the Philippines appointing a licensed real estate broker or property manager to manage residential or commercial property on behalf of the owner. Governed by the Real Estate Service Act (RA 9646) and the Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386). Covers authority to lease, collect rent, and maintain the property.
Condominium Lease Agreement (Philippines)
A Condominium Lease Agreement for the Philippines covering the lease of a residential condominium unit. Governed by the Civil Code, the Condominium Act (RA 4726), the Rent Control Act (RA 9653), and condominium corporation rules and restrictions. Includes monthly rent, security deposit, house rules compliance, and condominium association dues.