Whistleblower Policy (Philippines)
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) | SEC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 2016 | Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended)
Adopted by [Organization Name] ("Organization") on [Adoption Date].
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
1.1 This Whistleblower Policy ("Policy") establishes a formal framework for reporting concerns about illegal activity, unethical conduct, regulatory violations, and policy breaches within or involving the Organization, and protects good-faith reporters from retaliation.
1.2 This Policy applies to all directors, officers, employees, contractors, suppliers, customers, and other stakeholders of the Organization. It is consistent with the Organization's obligations under SEC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 2016 (Code of Corporate Governance for Publicly Listed Companies) and the Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended by RA 10365 and RA 11521).
2. REPORTABLE CONCERNS
2.1 The following types of concerns may be reported under this Policy: (a) violations of Philippine law, including the Revised Penal Code, Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019), Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended), Securities Regulation Code (RA 8799), Data Privacy Act (RA 10173), and Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175); (b) violations of the Organization's Code of Ethics, corporate governance policies, or internal controls; (c) financial fraud, accounting irregularities, or misstatements in financial reports; (d) bribery, corruption, or receipt of improper gifts or benefits; (e) workplace safety violations; (f) data privacy breaches; and (g) any other conduct that may cause significant harm to the Organization, its stakeholders, or the public.
3. HOW TO REPORT
3.1 Concerns may be reported through the following channels: [Reporting Channels]
3.2 Reports may be submitted anonymously. The Organization will make reasonable efforts to investigate anonymous reports, though the ability to conduct a complete investigation may be limited by the absence of identifying information.
3.3 Upon receipt of a report, the Organization will acknowledge receipt within the prescribed timeline and conduct an investigation: [Response Timeline]
3.4 All reports and investigation records will be treated as strictly confidential, subject to disclosures required by law, court order, or the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Office of the Ombudsman, or other regulatory authority.
4. INVESTIGATION PROCESS
4.1 Reports will be investigated by: [Investigating Body]. For reports involving senior management or the Board of Directors, the investigation will be conducted by or under the supervision of the Audit Committee or independent external counsel.
4.2 Persons named in a report will be notified of the nature of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond before findings are finalized, consistent with the right to due process under the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines.
4.3 Personal data collected during investigations will be processed in accordance with the Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and the Organization's Privacy Policy, and retained only for the period necessary to resolve the matter.
5. ANTI-RETALIATION PROTECTION
5.1 The Organization strictly prohibits retaliation against any person who makes a good-faith report under this Policy. Prohibited retaliation includes termination, demotion, suspension, harassment, discrimination, or any other adverse action related to the report.
5.2 Employees who believe they have been subjected to retaliation for making a good-faith report may file a complaint with the Organization's Human Resources department or directly with the Audit Committee, and may also file an illegal dismissal complaint before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) under the Labor Code (PD 442).
5.3 Officers and employees who file reports with the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) in good faith are protected from criminal, civil, and administrative liability under Section 9(c) of RA 9160 (as amended by RA 10365).
5.4 Knowingly false reports made in bad faith are not protected under this Policy and may be subject to disciplinary action and civil liability under Civil Code Articles 19 and 20.
6. EXTERNAL REPORTING CHANNELS
6.1 Where internal reporting is inadequate or where the concern involves the Organization itself, reporters may contact: (a) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Enforcement and Investor Protection Department at [email protected] or sec.gov.ph; (b) Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) at amlc.gov.ph; (c) Office of the Ombudsman at ombudsman.gov.ph for concerns involving government officials; (d) National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) at nbi.gov.ph; or (e) Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) at dole.gov.ph for labor-related concerns.
President / CEO
________________
Signature
Chairperson, Audit Committee
________________
Signature
What Is a Whistleblower Policy (Philippines)?
A Whistleblower Policy in the Philippines sets out the rules the organisation expects to be followed and the standards against which conduct will be judged.
The SEC Code of Corporate Governance for Publicly Listed Companies (MC No. 19-2016) requires PLCs to establish a mechanism for reporting and addressing concerns of employees and other parties regarding unethical practices, violations of the Code of Ethics, and violations of the corporate governance policy — effectively mandating a whistleblower or integrity reporting program. The SEC's revised governance code (MC No. 16-2020 for public companies) reinforces this requirement.
In the public sector, the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB) at ombudsman.gov.ph administers the primary anti-corruption reporting mechanism, with jurisdiction over public officials under the Ombudsman Act (Republic Act 6770, 1989). Whistleblowers reporting corruption to the Ombudsman may seek protection under the Witness Protection Program administered by the Department of Justice (DOJ) under RA 6981, which provides state witnesses with security, immunity from prosecution, and financial assistance.
The Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended) provides a specific whistleblower protection: Section 9(c) of RA 9160 (as amended by RA 10365) protects covered persons and their officers and employees from criminal, civil, and administrative liability for making reports to the AMLC in good faith, even if the reported transaction subsequently proves not to be a money laundering activity.
The legal framework governing the Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) in Philippines draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Parties executing a Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) in Philippines should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Whistleblower Policy (Philippines)?
A Whistleblower Policy is required or strongly recommended for Philippine corporations and organizations in several circumstances.
All publicly listed companies on the PSE must establish a whistleblower or integrity reporting mechanism under SEC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 2016, and must describe this mechanism in their Annual Corporate Governance Report (ACGR) submitted to the SEC.
All covered persons under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended) — including banks, insurance companies, and securities dealers — must protect employees who report suspicious or covered transactions to the AMLC from employer retaliation, making a formal whistleblower policy a practical necessity.
Any Philippine corporation that has adopted a Code of Ethics or Code of Conduct needs a Whistleblower Policy to provide a credible reporting mechanism for violations of that Code, without which the Code of Conduct becomes largely unenforceable.
Government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) governed by the GCG under the GOCC Governance Act (RA 10149) must have integrity and whistleblowing mechanisms as part of their governance frameworks.
Philippine corporations with international operations, foreign investors, or that are subsidiaries of multinational corporations often need a Whistleblower Policy to comply with the requirements of foreign anti-corruption laws — such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the UK Bribery Act 2010, and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention — which apply extraterritorially and require companies to have internal reporting mechanisms for bribery and corruption concerns.
Any organization receiving foreign grants, development funding, or official development assistance (ODA) from agencies such as USAID, the World Bank, or the Asian Development Bank (ADB) is typically required by the grant agreement to have a whistleblower protection policy.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Whistleblower Policy (Philippines)
A thorough Philippine Whistleblower Policy must include the following essential elements.
Scope and Covered Concerns: Definition of what types of conduct may be reported — including violations of Philippine law (Revised Penal Code, Anti-Graft Act, AMLA, Securities Regulation Code), violations of company policies, financial fraud, workplace safety issues, and environmental violations — and who may file a report (employees, contractors, suppliers, customers, and other parties).
Reporting Channels: Multiple reporting mechanisms, including: an anonymous online reporting portal or hotline; direct reporting to the Compliance Officer, Internal Audit, or Audit Committee; and an escalation path to the Board or a designated independent director where the concern involves senior management.
Confidentiality Protections: Commitment to maintain the confidentiality of the whistleblower's identity to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the need to conduct an adequate investigation. Limitations on confidentiality where disclosure is required by a court order, AMLC, SEC, or other regulatory authority should be clearly stated.
Anti-Retaliation Protections: Explicit prohibition on retaliation against any person who reports a concern in good faith, including protection from termination, demotion, suspension, harassment, or discrimination. The policy should reference the Labor Code (Presidential Decree 442) provisions on constructive dismissal and the NLRC's jurisdiction over retaliation claims.
Investigation Process: Description of the investigation procedure — intake, preliminary assessment, full investigation, findings report, and resolution — with timelines and the involvement of the Audit Committee or board-level oversight for significant matters.
Good Faith Requirement: Statement that the policy protects only good-faith reporters, and that knowingly false reports may be subject to disciplinary action consistent with Civil Code Articles 19 and 20 on abuse of rights.
External Reporting: Reference to external reporting channels — SEC Enforcement and Investor Protection Department at [email protected], AMLC at amlc.gov.ph, Office of the Ombudsman, and NBI — where internal reporting is inadequate or the concern involves the corporation itself.
Additional compliance elements for a Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/whistleblower-policy-philippines
"Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/whistleblower-policy-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-whistleblower-policy-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/whistleblower-policy-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019)}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Whistleblowers in the Philippines are protected by several legal instruments, though Philippine whistleblower protection is generally less comprehensive than in some other jurisdictions. The Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Program Act (Republic Act 6981, 1991) administered by the Department of Justice (DOJ) provides the most robust protection — state witnesses admitted to the program receive immunity from criminal prosecution, protection from retaliation, and financial assistance. However, this program applies primarily to witnesses in criminal proceedings, not to corporate or administrative whistleblowers. The Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended by RA 10365) protects covered persons and their employees from criminal, civil, and administrative liability for reporting suspicious or covered transactions to the AMLC in good faith under Section 9(c). The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) does not contain a specific whistleblower protection provision, but Section 30 imposes liability on directors and officers who retaliate against employees asserting their legal rights, which could encompass retaliation against whistleblowers. The Labor Code (Presidential Decree 442) protects employees from illegal dismissal and constructive dismissal — an employee terminated for whistleblowing may file a complaint for illegal dismissal before the NLRC.
No. Terminating a Philippine employee for whistleblowing — that is, for reporting illegal activity, regulatory violations, or ethical misconduct in good faith — would generally constitute illegal dismissal under the Labor Code (Presidential Decree 442, as amended). Under Section 279 of the Labor Code, an employee who is illegally dismissed is entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and full back wages. The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and Philippine courts have consistently held that dismissals motivated by the exercise of an employee's legal rights — including reporting violations to regulatory authorities — constitute illegal dismissal. The Supreme Court of the Philippines, in cases such as Globe Telecom, Inc. v Florendo-Flores (G.R. No. 150092, 2002) and Abbot Laboratories Philippines, Inc. v Alcaraz (G.R. No. 192571, 2013), has established that the grounds for dismissal under Articles 282 to 284 of the Labor Code are exclusive and that the employer bears the burden of proving just cause. Retaliatory termination of a whistleblower would likely be characterized by Philippine courts as dismissal without just cause and without due process — the twin procedural and substantive requirements of due process in termination under the Labor Code. In addition to reinstatement and back wages, an illegally dismissed employee may claim moral and exemplary damages under Civil Code Articles 2220 and 2229 where the dismissal was attended by bad faith, which retaliatory termination typically would be.
Philippine companies handling anonymous whistleblower reports should follow a structured process that balances the need for confidentiality with the requirements of a fair and thorough investigation. The company's Whistleblower Policy should establish a dedicated anonymous reporting channel — such as a third-party-managed ethics hotline, a secure online portal, or a dedicated postal address — that does not require the reporter to identify themselves. Upon receipt of an anonymous report, the company should: (a) acknowledge receipt through the anonymous channel without requesting identifying information; (b) conduct a preliminary assessment to determine if the report contains sufficient information to warrant investigation, recognizing that anonymous reports often require more initial investigative work to gather supporting evidence; (c) assign the investigation to a team that is independent of the persons named in the report — typically the Internal Audit function, the Compliance Officer, or external legal counsel; (d) document all steps of the investigation in a manner that can withstand scrutiny by the SEC, the Audit Committee, or courts; and (e) report the findings to the Audit Committee or Board.
A Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) does not legally require a lawyer in Philippines, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified Philippines lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Philippines) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
A Whistleblower Policy (Philippines) does not legally require a lawyer in the Philippines, though legal advice is recommended. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contracts. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates corporate documents. The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) oversees employment agreements. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and National Privacy Commission (NPC) impose data protection obligations. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) requires tax compliance. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point — always review with a qualified Philippine attorney for significant transactions. Under Philippines law, Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019), parties should seek independent legal advice from a qualified lawyer to confirm compliance with all applicable requirements. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Corporate Governance Policy (Philippines)
A Corporate Governance Policy for Philippine corporations under the Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019), SEC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 2016, and the Code of Corporate Governance for publicly listed companies. Covers board composition, duties of directors, audit and compliance committees, related-party transactions, and disclosure obligations.
Conflict of Interest Policy (Philippines)
A Conflict of Interest Policy for Philippine corporations under the Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019), SEC corporate governance codes, and the Code of Conduct for Government Officials (RA 6713). Covers disclosure obligations, recusal procedures, related-party transactions, and enforcement mechanisms for directors, officers, and employees.
Anti-Money Laundering Policy (Philippines)
An Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Policy for Philippine covered persons under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (RA 9160, as amended by RA 10365 and RA 11521). Covers customer due diligence (CDD), suspicious transaction reporting, covered transaction thresholds, record-keeping, and AMLC compliance obligations.