Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
[Court]
[Main Case Title]
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT
Rule 57, Rules of Court
APPLICANT [Applicant Name], with address at [Applicant Address], by counsel, respectfully applies for a Writ of Preliminary Attachment against the property of Defendant [Defendant Name], with address at [Defendant Address], and states:
I. THE CLAIM
1. Applicant's cause of action: [Cause of Action].
2. The total amount of the claim is [Claim Amount].
II. GROUND FOR ATTACHMENT
3. The applicable ground for attachment under Section 1, Rule 57 is: [Attachment Ground].
4. The specific facts supporting this ground are: [Ground Facts].
5. There is no other sufficient security for the claim sought to be enforced by this action.
III. PROPERTY TO BE ATTACHED
6. Applicant seeks attachment of the following property of Defendant: [Property to Attach].
IV. BOND
7. Applicant is prepared to post an attachment bond in the amount of [Bond Amount] under Section 3, Rule 57 to indemnify Defendant against any damage the Defendant may suffer by reason of the attachment if the court ultimately finds the attachment was wrongfully issued.
V. PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully prays that this Honorable Court:
(a) ISSUE a Writ of Preliminary Attachment directing the Sheriff to attach and hold in custodia legis the property of Defendant described herein, up to the value of [Claim Amount];
(b) FIX the attachment bond at the amount stated herein or at such amount as the Court deems appropriate;
(c) GRANT such other and further relief as may be just and equitable.
Filed on [Filing Date].
[Applicant Name]
Applicant
Applicant / Authorized Representative
________________
Signature
What Is a Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines)?
An Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment in the Philippines sets out the complainant's allegations and the relief sought from the authority or forum it is addressed to.
Rule 57, Section 1 of the Rules of Court enumerates the grounds on which a writ of preliminary attachment may issue: (a) recovery of a specified amount of money or damages on a cause of action arising from law, contract, quasi-contract, delict, or quasi-delict, against a defendant who is about to depart from the Philippines with intent to defraud creditors; (b) cases where the defendant has concealed, removed, or is about to remove property to defraud creditors; (c) cases where the defendant has fraudulently disposed of or concealed property subject to execution; (d) where the defendant has been guilty of fraud in contracting the debt or incurring the obligation; (e) where the defendant has violated the terms of an express trust; and (f) where the defendant is a non-resident foreigner.
The requisites for the issuance of a writ of preliminary attachment were articulated by the Supreme Court in Ng Wee v. Tankiansee (G.R. No. 171124, February 13, 2008): the applicant must have a sufficient cause of action; the case is one of those mentioned in Section 1, Rule 57; there is no other sufficient security for the claim sought to be enforced; and the amount due to the applicant (or a sum of money involved) is as much as the sum for which the order is granted, above all legal counterclaims.
A writ of preliminary attachment is distinct from a garnishment, which specifically targets money or credits in the hands of a third party (such as a bank account). Both attachment and garnishment are governed by Rule 57 and Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. The writ of preliminary attachment is also distinct from a levy on execution under Rule 39, which is a post-judgment remedy — attachment is a pre-judgment remedy to secure a prospective judgment.
The legal framework governing the Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) in Philippines draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Parties executing a Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) in Philippines should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines)?
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment in the Philippines is needed whenever a creditor or claimant fears that the defendant will dissipate, conceal, or remove assets before a judgment can be obtained and enforced.
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment is needed when a business partner discovers that the other partner has been secretly transferring company funds to personal accounts and is about to flee the Philippines, constituting fraud under Section 1(d) of Rule 57 — fraud in contracting or incurring the obligation.
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment is needed when a seller of real property discovers that the buyer is liquidating all assets and preparing to depart the Philippines permanently without having paid the full purchase price, satisfying the ground under Section 1(a) of Rule 57.
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment is needed by a bank or financial institution to secure the assets of a corporate borrower who has defaulted on a loan and is transferring property to related parties to frustrate collection, satisfying the ground under Section 1(c) — fraudulent disposal or concealment.
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment is needed when a foreign judgment creditor is enforcing a foreign arbitral award or foreign court judgment and discovers that the Philippine respondent is dissipating assets before the recognition and enforcement petition can be resolved.
A Writ of Preliminary Attachment is needed when a supplier or contractor is owed a large sum by a client who is about to become insolvent and has been seen removing equipment and inventory from its business premises without paying outstanding invoices, satisfying Section 1(b) — removal or concealment of property.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines)
A valid Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment in the Philippines must contain the following elements under Rule 57 of the Rules of Court.
Main Case Connection: Identification of the pending main action to which the attachment application is ancillary — the case title, docket number, and court. Under Section 2, Rule 57, the application must be made at the commencement of or at any time before entry of final judgment.
Ground for Attachment: Specific identification of the applicable ground under Section 1, Rule 57 and detailed factual allegations supporting that ground. The ground must be clearly stated — courts strictly construe attachment as an extraordinary remedy under Adlawan v. Torres (G.R. No. 99990, October 27, 1993).
Affidavit of the Applicant: A verified affidavit executed by the applicant or an authorized representative, under Section 3 of Rule 57, stating: (a) that a sufficient cause of action exists; (b) that the case is one of those specifically mentioned in Section 1; (c) that there is no other sufficient security for the claim; and (d) that the amount due (or the value of the property involved) is as much as the sum for which the order is granted, above all legal counterclaims. Philippine courts strictly require this affidavit — a defective or insufficient affidavit is a ground for quashing the writ per Mindanao Savings and Loan Association v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 84097, October 26, 1990).
Attachment Bond: Under Section 3 of Rule 57, the applicant must post a bond to indemnify the defendant for any damage the defendant may suffer by reason of the attachment if the court ultimately finds the applicant was not entitled to it. The bond amount is fixed by the court.
Property Description: Identification of the specific property to be attached — real property (with TCT or tax declaration number), personal property (with description and estimated value), bank accounts (with bank and branch name), shares of stock (with issuing corporation and number of shares), or other attachable assets under Section 7, Rule 57.
Relief Prayed For: Prayer for issuance of the writ directing the Sheriff to attach and hold in custodia legis the identified property pending resolution of the main case, and fixing the attachment bond.
Additional compliance elements for a Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/provisional-remedy-attachment-philippines
"Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/provisional-remedy-attachment-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-provisional-remedy-attachment-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/business/corporate/provisional-remedy-attachment-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Under Section 7 of Rule 57 of the Rules of Court, the following property may be attached in the Philippines: real property (land, buildings, improvements) and growing crops thereon, by filing a copy of the writ and a description of the property with the Register of Deeds under Presidential Decree No. 1529 (Property Registration Decree); personal property capable of manual delivery, by taking it into the Sheriff's custody; stocks or shares in a corporation or company, by leaving a copy of the writ with the corporate secretary; interest in property belonging to the estate of a decedent, by serving a copy on the executor or administrator; money, bank deposits, and credits of the defendant in the hands of third parties, by garnishment served on the bank or third-party holder; and claims for recovery of specific personal property, by attaching any personal property of the defendant. Property exempt from execution under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court — including the family home under Article 155 of the Family Code (Executive Order No. 209), tools of trade, and clothing — is also exempt from attachment.
Section 3 of Rule 57 of the Rules of Court requires that the applicant for a writ of preliminary attachment in the Philippines submit a verified affidavit — executed by the applicant or by a person who personally knows the facts — stating four specific matters: (1) that a sufficient cause of action exists in the applicant's favor against the defendant; (2) that the case is one of those mentioned in Section 1, Rule 57 (the specific ground must be identified); (3) that there is no other sufficient security for the claim sought to be enforced by the action; and (4) that the amount due to the applicant, or the value of the property the possession of which the applicant is entitled to recover, is as much as the sum for which the order is granted above all legal counterclaims. The Supreme Court in Sievert v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 84034, December 22, 1988) held that the affidavit is a jurisdictional requirement — without a valid affidavit, the court acquires no jurisdiction to issue the writ, and the writ may be quashed on motion of the defendant. The affidavit must contain ultimate facts, not mere conclusions of law.
A defendant may discharge a writ of preliminary attachment in the Philippines through three methods under Rule 57 of the Rules of Court. First, under Section 12, the defendant may post a counter-bond equal to the value of the attached property — the counter-bond substitutes for the attached property as security for the judgment, and the attached property is released. Second, under Section 13, the defendant may move to discharge the attachment on the ground that it was improperly or irregularly issued — for example, that the affidavit was defective, that the bond was insufficient, that the ground stated in Section 1 does not exist, or that the applicant's claim has been paid or otherwise extinguished. Third, under Section 19, the attachment is discharged by final judgment in favor of the defendant in the main case, at which point the plaintiff becomes liable on the attachment bond for actual damages proven by the defendant. The Supreme Court in Davao Light and Power Co. v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 93262, November 29, 1991) held that the defendant may move to discharge the attachment at any time after the writ has been served and implemented.
Preliminary attachment and garnishment in the Philippines are related but distinct remedies under Rule 57 of the Rules of Court. Preliminary attachment is the broader remedy — it covers all property of the defendant, including real property, personal property, shares of stock, and credits. Attachment of real property is effected by filing the writ with the Register of Deeds under PD 1529; attachment of personal property is effected by taking it into the Sheriff's custody. Garnishment is a specific type of attachment targeting credits, money, or other personal property of the defendant that is in the hands of a third party — typically bank deposits or accounts receivable. Under Section 9(c) of Rule 57, garnishment is served on the third-party holder (such as a bank), who is then required to hold the funds subject to the court's order and not to deliver them to the defendant. In practice, garnishment of bank accounts is one of the most effective provisional remedies in the Philippines because bank accounts are readily identifiable, easily frozen, and highly liquid. Both attachment and garnishment require the posting of a bond by the applicant.
A Application for Writ of Preliminary Attachment (Philippines) does not legally require a lawyer in Philippines, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232, 2019) does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified Philippines lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Philippines) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Application for Preliminary Injunction (Philippines)
A Philippine court application for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order (TRO) under Rule 58 of the Rules of Court (as amended by A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC). Covers both prohibitory injunctions (enjoining an act) and mandatory injunctions (compelling performance). Applicable to civil cases before the Regional Trial Court, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court.
Application for Writ of Replevin (Philippines)
A Philippine application for a writ of replevin under Rule 60 of the Rules of Court, seeking the immediate recovery of personal property wrongfully detained by another. Covers affidavit and bond requirements, applicable to chattel mortgage defaults, wrongful repossession disputes, and recovery of specified movable property before final judgment.
Demand Letter (Philippines)
A formal Demand Letter for the Philippines requiring payment of a debt, performance of an obligation, or remedy of a breach under the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386). Puts the debtor or obligor in default (mora solvendi) and establishes the factual basis for filing suit before the Regional Trial Court or Metropolitan Trial Court.