FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan)
APPEAL FORM
Before: [Appellate Forum]
Under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 / Sales Tax Act 1990
Date of Filing: [Appeal Date]
Appeal No.: _____ of _____
PART I — APPELLANT DETAILS
Appellant Name: [Appellant Name]
National Tax Number (NTN): [Appellant NTN]
CNIC / SECP No.: [Appellant CNIC/SECP]
Address: [Appellant Address]
Authorized Representative: [Representative Name]
PART II — DETAILS OF IMPUGNED ORDER
Type of Order: [Order Type]
Date of Order: [Order Date]
Order Reference: [Order Reference]
Tax Year: [Tax Year]
Total Tax / Penalty Demanded: [Tax Demanded]
Amount in Dispute (Portion Appealed): [Amount in Dispute]
PART III — GROUNDS OF APPEAL
The Appellant respectfully submits the following grounds of appeal against the impugned order:
[Grounds of Appeal]
PART IV — RELIEF SOUGHT
The Appellant prays that the Honourable [Appellate Forum] may be pleased to grant the following relief:
[Relief Sought]
VERIFICATION
I/We, [Appellant Name], the Appellant above named, do hereby solemnly affirm that the contents of this appeal are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed.
Verified at _____ on [Appeal Date].
Signature of Appellant: _________________________
Name: [Appellant Name]
NTN: [Appellant NTN]
Signature of Authorized Representative: _________________________
Name: [Representative Name]
Designation / Enrolment No.: _________________________
Appellant / Taxpayer
________________
Signature
Authorized Representative (Advocate / Tax Consultant)
________________
Signature
What Is a FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan)?
A FBR Appeal Form in Pakistan records the grievance and the facts relied on, initiating the process before the relevant tribunal or office.
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is the apex tax authority in Pakistan, established under the Federal Board of Revenue Act 2007, responsible for administering and collecting federal taxes including income tax, sales tax on goods, federal excise duty, and customs duty. FBR's Inland Revenue Service (IRS) administers income tax under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and sales tax under the Sales Tax Act 1990. The Customs Wing administers the Customs Act 1969 and import/export duties. Disputes arising from FBR's tax administration are resolved through the appellate hierarchy prescribed in the respective statutes.
Under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the appellate hierarchy for income tax disputes is: (1) First appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) under Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, filed within 30 days of service of the order being appealed; (2) Second appeal to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) under Section 131 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, filed within 60 days of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals); (3) Reference to the High Court under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 on a question of law, filed within 90 days of the ATIR order; and (4) Further appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan on constitutional or other grounds.
Under the Sales Tax Act 1990, the appellate hierarchy follows a parallel structure: first appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 45B, second appeal to ATIR under Section 46, and reference to the High Court on a question of law under Section 47. Under the Federal Excise Act 2005, appeals follow a similar structure under Sections 33 and 34. Under the Customs Act 1969, the appellate hierarchy is: Collector of Customs (Appeals) under Section 193, then ATIR (Customs Bench) under Section 194, then High Court reference under Section 196.
The FBR Appeal Form Pakistan must be prepared in strict compliance with the prescribed format. Rule 1 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue) Rules 2010 and the Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal Regulations 2010 prescribe the format and content requirements for appeals before ATIR. Appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) are governed by Chapter XV of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the FBR's Appellate Manual. The FBR's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism under Section 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 also allows taxpayers to settle disputes with FBR through a committee of FBR officers and independent experts, as an alternative to formal appellate proceedings.
When Do You Need a FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan)?
An FBR Appeal Form in Pakistan is required whenever a taxpayer disagrees with an adverse order passed by a Taxation Officer of FBR's Inland Revenue Service and wishes to exercise their statutory right of challenge before the designated appellate authority.
An FBR Appeal Form is needed when the Commissioner Inland Revenue has passed an assessment order under Section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 amending the taxpayer's filed income tax return and raising an additional demand on grounds including disallowance of business expenses, addition of deemed income, non-recognition of tax credits, or incorrect application of tax rates. The taxpayer has 30 days from service of the amended assessment order to file a first appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
An FBR Appeal Form is required when FBR has imposed a penalty under Sections 182 or 184 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 for non-filing of income tax returns, late filing, concealment of income, or failure to comply with a notice. Penalty orders may be appealed through the same appellate hierarchy as assessment orders.
An FBR Appeal Form is needed when a withholding agent has been held liable under Section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 for failure to deduct or collect withholding tax from employees, contractors, suppliers, or service providers at the prescribed rates under Sections 149 to 156 of the Ordinance. The withholding agent may challenge the order if the tax was not legally deductible or if the rate applied was incorrect.
An FBR Appeal Form is required when FBR has issued a show cause notice and passed an order under the Sales Tax Act 1990 alleging short payment of output tax, disallowance of input tax credits, or fraudulent refund claims. Registered persons under the Sales Tax Act 1990 who disagree with the order must file an appeal within 30 days before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 45B.
An FBR Appeal Form is needed when FBR has rejected a refund application or reduced the refund amount claimed under Section 170 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or Section 67 of the Sales Tax Act 1990. Taxpayers may appeal the refund rejection or partial refund order to the Commissioner (Appeals) within the prescribed time limit.
An FBR Appeal Form is required when FBR has passed an order under Section 111 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 treating unexplained income or assets as taxable income and adding them to the taxpayer's assessed income. Section 111 assessments are frequently challenged on the grounds that the source of the income or asset has been adequately explained.
What to Include in Your FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan)
A valid FBR Appeal Form in Pakistan under Sections 127–131 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the applicable appellate rules must contain the following essential elements to be entertained by the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR).
Appellant Identification: Full legal name of the appellant (individual taxpayer's name as per CNIC, or company name as registered with SECP), the National Tax Number (NTN) issued by FBR, the Computerised National Identity Card (CNIC) number for individual taxpayers, the registered office or residential address, and the contact details of the appellant or their authorized representative (Tax Consultant or Advocate enrolled before ATIR under the ATIR Rules 2010).
Details of the Impugned Order: The date, nature, and reference number of the order being appealed against — e.g. 'Assessment Order under Section 122(5A) dated [date], Tax Year [year], passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Audit), Unit [unit number], [city]'. The relevant statute and the specific section under which the order was passed must be cited.
Ground of Appeal: A numbered list of specific legal and factual grounds on which the appellant challenges the impugned order. Each ground must be stated with sufficient particularity — the Commissioner (Appeals) and ATIR do not consider vague or omnibus grounds. Typical grounds include: (i) the addition/disallowance is contrary to Section [X] of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001; (ii) the Taxation Officer failed to consider the documentary evidence submitted; (iii) the computation of tax is arithmetically incorrect; (iv) the penalty is disproportionate and not warranted by the facts; (v) the order is barred by limitation under Section 122(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
Amount of Tax in Dispute: The total amount of additional tax, penalty, and default surcharge demanded in the impugned order, and the portion that the appellant concedes (if any) versus the portion being appealed. The statement of disputed amount is important because: (a) court fees before ATIR are calculated as a percentage of the disputed tax; and (b) pre-payment requirements under proviso to Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 require the appellant to pay the tax due on the income not in dispute before the first appeal is admitted.
Documentary Evidence: Copies of all documents relied upon in support of the grounds of appeal, indexed and paginated. These typically include the impugned order, the notice issued by the Taxation Officer, the taxpayer's response to the notice, the assessed tax return, and any financial statements, accounts, invoices, or agreements relevant to the disputed additions.
Prayer for Relief: A clear statement of the specific relief sought — e.g. cancellation of the assessment order, deletion of specific additions, reduction of penalty, or direction for refund. The prayer must be specific; a general prayer to 'allow the appeal' without specifying which additions or penalties are challenged is insufficient.
Verification and Signature: The appeal must be signed by the appellant (individual taxpayer or authorized officer of the company) or by an authorized representative holding a duly stamped and notarized power of attorney. Tax Consultants and Advocates appearing before ATIR must be enrolled on ATIR's approved representatives list under Rule 22 of the ATIR Rules 2010.
Filing Fee and Pre-Payment: The prescribed filing fee for an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or ATIR must be paid by bank draft or pay order. Additionally, under the proviso to Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the appellant must pay the tax due on returned income (the income accepted by the taxpayer in the return, not in dispute) before the first appeal is entertained. Failure to comply with pre-payment requirements may result in the appeal being rejected as non-maintainable. Forms-legal.com provides this FBR Appeal Form template as a practical guide. Taxpayers are strongly advised to engage a qualified Income Tax Practitioner, Chartered Accountant, or Advocate experienced in FBR tax litigation before Pakistan's Inland Revenue appellate forums.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan) (Pakistan) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/fbr-appeal-form-pakistan
"FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan) (Pakistan)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/fbr-appeal-form-pakistan.
@misc{formslegal-fbr-appeal-form-pakistan,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {FBR Appeal Form (Pakistan) (Pakistan)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/fbr-appeal-form-pakistan}},
note = {Free legal document template}
}Frequently Asked Questions
The time limits for filing FBR appeals in Pakistan are strictly prescribed by statute. For income tax disputes under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001: a first appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) under Section 127 must be filed within 30 days of service of the order being appealed. A second appeal to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) under Section 131 must be filed within 60 days of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). A reference to the High Court under Section 133 on a question of law must be filed within 90 days of the ATIR order. For sales tax disputes under the Sales Tax Act 1990, appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 45B must be filed within 30 days of the impugned order. These deadlines are strictly enforced, and an appeal filed even one day late may be dismissed as time-barred unless the appellant can demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay and the appellate authority condones the delay in exercise of its discretionary power. Taxpayers should calculate the 30-day period from the date of actual service (receipt) of the order, not from the date of the order itself.
Under the proviso to Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, a taxpayer filing a first appeal before the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) must pay the amount of tax due on the income shown in the return (i.e. the tax on undisputed income) before the appeal is entertained. The taxpayer is not required to pay the tax on the disputed additions before the appeal is admitted — only the tax on the income that the taxpayer itself has declared in the return and not disputed. The Commissioner (Appeals) may also grant a stay of recovery of disputed tax during the pendency of the appeal under Section 128 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, on application by the taxpayer showing good cause. Before ATIR, the Tribunal may similarly stay recovery of disputed tax pending disposal of the appeal under Rule 26 of the ATIR Rules 2010. FBR's field formations (RTO/LTO offices) retain the right to take recovery action on undisputed tax during the pendency of the appeal. Taxpayers who fail to pay undisputed tax while pursuing appeals may face attachment of bank accounts and property under the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001.
The Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) is the second appellate forum for disputes arising under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Sales Tax Act 1990, and the Federal Excise Act 2005 in Pakistan. ATIR was established under Section 130 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Regulations 2010. ATIR consists of judicial members (drawn from the judiciary or legal profession) and accountant members (chartered accountants or senior FBR officers) sitting in benches of two members — one judicial and one accountant. ATIR has benches in Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad. Appeals to ATIR are filed under Section 131 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 within 60 days of the Commissioner (Appeals) order. ATIR has power to confirm, vary, set aside, or annul the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), or to remand the case back for fresh adjudication. ATIR decisions are binding on FBR formations and the Commissioner (Appeals) but may be challenged by either party through a reference to the High Court under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 on a question of law only — ATIR's findings of fact are generally final.
FBR's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism under Section 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 allows taxpayers with disputes before FBR — at any stage of the appellate process — to apply to FBR's Board for resolution of the dispute through a committee comprising FBR officers and one or two independent experts (retired judges, senior chartered accountants, or legal experts). The ADR committee examines the dispute and makes recommendations to FBR within 60 days of appointment. If FBR accepts the ADR recommendation, the dispute is settled on those terms and any pending appeal is withdrawn. ADR is not binding — either party (taxpayer or FBR) may reject the ADR recommendation and continue with formal appellate proceedings. ADR is particularly beneficial for large, complex disputes where protracted litigation before ATIR and the High Court would be expensive and time-consuming. Customs disputes have a separate ADR mechanism under Section 195C of the Customs Act 1969. Tax practitioners in Pakistan advise that ADR is most effective for disputes involving reasonable taxpayers and FBR formations where the tax demand has a strong revenue collection component but the underlying legal position is contestable.
Yes. Under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, either the taxpayer or the Commissioner of Inland Revenue may refer a question of law arising from an ATIR order to the High Court having jurisdiction — typically the Lahore High Court (for Punjab and Islamabad), the Sindh High Court (for Sindh), the Peshawar High Court (for KPK), or the Balochistan High Court (for Balochistan). A reference must be filed within 90 days of the ATIR order. The High Court does not re-examine facts — it decides only the question of law referred. If the High Court finds that the question involves a substantial question of law, it may answer it and remit the case to ATIR for decision in conformity with the High Court's ruling. High Court decisions on income tax references are binding on ATIR and all lower forums in that province. An appeal from the High Court's decision on a tax reference lies to the Supreme Court of Pakistan under Article 185 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973. Many landmark tax judgments in Pakistan — including decisions of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of tax provisions — have originated as references from ATIR.
While the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 provides a broad right of appeal against orders of taxation officers, certain orders are not directly appealable to the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 127. These include: orders passed by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) themselves (which are appealable only to ATIR); ATIR orders (appealable only by reference to the High Court under Section 133 on a question of law); orders of the High Court or Supreme Court; and certain procedural orders that do not finally determine the taxpayer's liability. Additionally, orders passed under some specific provisions — such as orders granting or refusing taxpayer registration, and orders under the Customs Act 1969 — follow different appellate structures (Collector of Customs Appeals for customs matters, and ATIR's Customs Bench). Taxpayers may challenge non-appealable orders by invoking the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 (writ jurisdiction) if the order is without lawful authority or violates fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has affirmed in multiple cases that the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over tax administration is a fundamental constitutional safeguard even where the statute does not provide a specific appeal.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful: