Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan)
APPEAL TO THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS)
Under Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 / Section 45B of the Sales Tax Act 1990
To,
The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals)
[FBR Office]
Date of Appeal: [Appeal Date]
Appellant Information
PART I — APPELLANT PARTICULARS
Appellant Name: [Appellant Name]
National Tax Number (NTN): [Appellant NTN]
CNIC (if individual): [Appellant CNIC]
Address: [Appellant Address]
FBR Jurisdiction: [FBR Office]
Impugned Order
PART II — IMPUGNED ORDER
Order Date: [Order Date]
Order Number: [Order Number]
Issuing Officer: [Issuing Officer]
Tax Year / Period: [Tax Year]
Nature of Order: [Nature of Order]
Additional Tax Demand / Penalty: [Demand Amount]
Admitted Tax Deposited: [Admitted Tax Paid]
Grounds of Appeal
PART III — GROUNDS OF APPEAL
Ground 1: [Ground One]
Ground 2: [Ground Two]
Ground 3: [Ground Three]
Relief Claimed
PART IV — RELIEF CLAIMED
[Relief Sought]
The appellant respectfully requests the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) to allow this appeal under Section 129 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and to grant the relief prayed above.
Verification
VERIFICATION
I, [Appellant Name] (NTN: [Appellant NTN]), do hereby solemnly declare that the contents of this appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that all grounds stated herein are made in good faith.
Signature: _________________________
Name: [Appellant Name]
NTN: [Appellant NTN]
Date: [Appeal Date]
Appellant / Authorised Representative
________________
Signature
What Is a Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan)?
An Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue in Pakistan sets out the complainant's allegations and the relief sought from the authority or forum it is addressed to.
The Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — the primary federal statute governing income tax in Pakistan, administered by the FBR under the Federal Board of Revenue Act 2007 — establishes the income tax appeal mechanism in Sections 127 to 133. Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 grants any person aggrieved by an order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue (under original jurisdiction) or an Additional Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or an Assistant Commissioner the right to appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) within thirty days of the date of service of the impugned order. Common orders against which Section 127 appeals are filed include: best judgment assessments under Section 121 (where the taxpayer failed to file returns); amended assessments under Section 122 (where the Commissioner amended the taxpayer's self-assessment on the basis of definite information); penalty orders under Section 182 (for failure to furnish return, furnishing incorrect return, or failure to produce accounts); and withholding tax default orders against employers under Sections 149 and 161.
For sales tax appeals, Section 45B of the Sales Tax Act 1990 provides the right to appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) against orders of the Sales Tax Officer — including orders creating sales tax liability, imposing penalties under Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, or rejecting input tax credit claims. For Federal Excise Duty matters, Section 34 of the Federal Excise Act 2005 provides the parallel appeal right. The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) has power to confirm, modify, annul, or set aside the impugned order, and to remand the case to the original officer for fresh decision with specific directions.
The FBR, established under the Federal Board of Revenue Act 2007 as the apex federal tax authority, administers the Large Taxpayer Offices (LTOs) in Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad for large corporate taxpayers, the Medium Taxpayer Offices (MTOs) for medium-sized taxpayers, and the Regional Tax Offices (RTOs) across Pakistan for small and medium taxpayers. The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) is assigned to each LTO, MTO, and RTO, and taxpayers must file their appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals) having jurisdiction over the territory where the original order was made.
The Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) — established under Section 130 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — is the second appellate forum, comprising judicial and accountant members appointed by the federal government. Orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) may be challenged before the ATIR within sixty days under Section 131. The High Court (third forum) and the Supreme Court of Pakistan (final forum) hear tax references and petitions on questions of law — not facts — from ATIR orders under Sections 133 and 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
When Do You Need a Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan)?
An Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue Pakistan is required whenever a taxpayer receives a tax order from an Inland Revenue Officer that the taxpayer believes is factually incorrect, legally flawed, or procedurally defective — and the taxpayer wishes to formally challenge that order through the statutory appeal mechanism.
An appeal to Commissioner IR is needed when an individual taxpayer or company receives a best judgment assessment under Section 121 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — where the Commissioner has estimated taxable income and raised a tax demand based on estimates rather than actual accounts, often because the taxpayer failed to file a return or produce records. Such assessments frequently overstate taxable income and must be challenged before the Commissioner (Appeals) with supporting documentation within thirty days.
An appeal is required when the Commissioner Inland Revenue issues an amended assessment under Section 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — commonly called an 'audit assessment' — following an income tax audit selecting the taxpayer under Section 214C (random selection through the IRIS system) or Section 177 (specific selection). Audit assessments frequently disallow claimed expenses, add unexplained income, or reject accounting methods — all of which are grounds for appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals).
An Appeal to Commissioner IR is needed when a penalty order is issued under Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — for example, for late filing of the income tax return (penalty of 0.1% of tax payable per day of default), furnishing an incorrect return, or failure to comply with a notice under Section 176 requiring production of information or accounts. Penalty orders must be challenged within thirty days of service.
An appeal is required when an employer receives a withholding agent default order under Section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — asserting that the employer failed to deduct income tax from salary payments to employees under Section 149, from contractual payments under Section 153, or from dividend payments under Section 150 — and seeks to contest the default finding or the quantum of deemed tax liability attributed to the employer.
An Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue is needed when a sales tax registered person receives an order under Section 11 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 creating additional sales tax liability — for example, by rejecting input tax credit claims on the ground that the suppliers are not on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL) maintained by FBR, or by treating zero-rated supplies as standard-rated — and the registered person disputes the factual or legal basis of the order.
What to Include in Your Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan)
An Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue Pakistan filed under Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or Section 45B of the Sales Tax Act 1990 must contain the following essential elements to be admissible and effective.
Appellant Identification: Full legal name of the appellant (individual, AOP, or company), National Tax Number (NTN) assigned by FBR through IRIS (Income Tax Return Information System), Computerised National Identity Card (CNIC) number for individual taxpayers, Sales Tax Registration Number (STRN) for sales tax matters, mailing address, and contact details for correspondence with the Commissioner (Appeals) office.
Impugned Order Details: Date of the order being appealed, order number, name and designation of the Inland Revenue Officer who made the order (Commissioner, Additional Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or Assistant Commissioner), tax year or tax period to which the order relates, and the amount of additional tax demand, penalty, or other adverse action contained in the order. For income tax appeals, the tax year is stated as the assessment year — for example, Tax Year 2024 (income from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024).
Grounds of Appeal: Clear, numbered statements of each legal and factual ground on which the appellant challenges the impugned order. Common grounds include: the assessment was made without affording the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity of being heard, violating Section 122(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the principles of natural justice; the addition of income was based on surmise and conjecture without definite information as required by Section 122(5A); claimed expenses were disallowed without legal basis — they are deductible under Section 20 (income from business) or Section 23 (depreciation) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001; the penalty was disproportionate or imposed without establishing the requisite mens rea; or the sales tax input tax credit rejection was contrary to Section 8 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 because the purchases were genuine and supported by valid tax invoices.
Statement of Facts: A chronological narrative of the relevant facts — the taxpayer's business activity, the return filing history, the audit proceedings, the notices received and responses given, and the circumstances leading to the impugned order — providing the Commissioner (Appeals) with the factual context required to assess the grounds of appeal.
Pre-Deposit Compliance: Confirmation that the appellant has deposited the admitted tax (the undisputed portion of the tax liability) as required by Section 127(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — the Commissioner (Appeals) may not entertain an appeal unless the appellant has paid the amount of tax that is not in dispute. Proof of payment of the admitted tax (bank challan or FBR IRIS payment receipt) must be attached.
Relief Claimed: Specific statement of the relief sought from the Commissioner (Appeals) — for example, annulment of the impugned order, deletion of specific additions or disallowances, reduction of penalty to nil or a lesser amount, or remand to the original officer with direction to allow the input tax credit. The relief claimed must correspond to the grounds raised.
List of Annexures: Itemised list of all documents attached — copy of the impugned order, copy of the original return filed, tax payment challans, correspondence with FBR during audit, financial statements, invoices, bank statements, or any other evidence supporting the grounds of appeal.
Forms-legal.com provides this Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan) template as a practical guide for taxpayers and their tax consultants. Tax appeal proceedings involve complex legal issues under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Sales Tax Act 1990, and FBR's administrative guidelines — taxpayers are strongly advised to engage a tax advisor enrolled with the Income Tax Bar Association or a chartered accountant registered with ICAP for representation before the Commissioner (Appeals).
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan) (Pakistan) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/appeal-to-commissioner-inland-revenue-pakistan
"Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan) (Pakistan)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/appeal-to-commissioner-inland-revenue-pakistan.
@misc{formslegal-appeal-to-commissioner-inland-revenue-pakistan,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Pakistan) (Pakistan)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/pakistan/government/tax-forms/appeal-to-commissioner-inland-revenue-pakistan}},
note = {Free legal document template}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, a taxpayer must file an appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) within thirty days of the date on which the impugned order was served on the taxpayer. Service of an order under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 is governed by Section 218 — an order is deemed served when it is delivered personally to the taxpayer, left at the taxpayer's last known address, or sent by registered post to the taxpayer's address in FBR's IRIS system. The thirty-day period begins from the date of service, not the date the order was made. The Commissioner (Appeals) has discretion to condone delay in filing the appeal if the appellant provides a satisfactory explanation — in the form of a separate application for condonation of delay — for the failure to file within thirty days. Courts have held that genuine medical emergencies, absence abroad, or non-service of the order may constitute sufficient grounds for condonation. For sales tax appeals under Section 45B of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and federal excise appeals under Section 34 of the Federal Excise Act 2005, the same thirty-day limitation applies. Taxpayers should calculate the limitation period carefully — a late appeal filed even one day after the limitation period expires without a condonation application risks dismissal in limine by the Commissioner (Appeals).
Yes, in part. Section 127(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 requires that a taxpayer, before filing an appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), must pay the amount of tax that is not in dispute — the 'admitted tax' or 'undisputed tax liability'. The admitted tax is the amount that the taxpayer concedes is owed, excluding the additional demand created by the impugned assessment or penalty order. For example, if the taxpayer's self-assessment showed a tax liability of PKR 500,000 and the Commissioner's amended assessment raised this to PKR 800,000, the admitted tax is PKR 500,000 — the additional PKR 300,000 is disputed and can be appealed without pre-deposit. The Commissioner (Appeals) is required to satisfy themselves that admitted tax has been deposited before admitting the appeal. Proof of payment — FBR's payment receipt (CPR) generated through IRIS — must be attached to the appeal. In cases where the entire assessment is disputed and the taxpayer's self-assessment showed nil liability, an application may be made to the Commissioner (Appeals) for stay of recovery pending the appeal. The Commissioner (Appeals) may grant a stay of recovery for a period up to thirty days under Section 138A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which may be extended by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) upon further application.
The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) — the first appellate authority under Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 — has wide powers to dispose of an appeal. Under Section 129 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Commissioner (Appeals) may: confirm the impugned order in full, upholding every aspect of the original officer's decision; modify the impugned order — for example, by deleting some additions while upholding others, or by reducing a penalty; annul the impugned order in its entirety, directing that no tax or penalty is payable; or set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the original Inland Revenue Officer with specific directions for fresh consideration — a remand order is common where the original assessment was made without proper opportunity of hearing or without examination of relevant evidence. The Commissioner (Appeals) may not enhance the assessment or impose additional liability beyond what was determined in the impugned order — the appeal cannot be used to increase the taxpayer's liability beyond the original demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) must decide the appeal within 120 days of filing under Section 129A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, failing which the appeal is deemed to have been decided in favour of the appellant — though this deemed-in-favour provision has been applied inconsistently by FBR field offices.
After the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) issues an order on the appeal, both the taxpayer and the Commissioner Inland Revenue (the tax department) have the right to further appeal to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) under Section 131 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. The appeal to ATIR must be filed within sixty days of the date the Commissioner (Appeals) order is communicated to the party. ATIR comprises a Judicial Member (a person with legal expertise, typically a retired judge or advocate) and an Accountant Member (a senior FBR officer or chartered accountant) sitting together as a bench. ATIR hears both factual and legal issues and may confirm, modify, annul, or remand the Commissioner (Appeals) order. If the taxpayer is aggrieved by the ATIR order, a Reference to the High Court may be filed under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 within ninety days on a question of law — the High Court does not re-examine facts, only legal questions. The Lahore High Court, Sindh High Court, Peshawar High Court, Balochistan High Court, and Islamabad High Court each have dedicated tax benches for such references. Further appeal from the High Court lies to the Supreme Court of Pakistan under its appellate jurisdiction. For sales tax and federal excise duty matters, the parallel appeal hierarchy is the Commissioner (Appeals), ATIR, and then the High Court.
A taxpayer in Pakistan whose tax demand has been challenged in appeal proceedings may apply for a stay of recovery to prevent FBR from coercive recovery action — such as bank account attachment, property seizure, or garnishment of receivables — during the pendency of the appeal. At the Commissioner (Appeals) level, Section 138A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to grant a stay of recovery for up to thirty days from the date of filing the appeal. The thirty-day Commissioner (Appeals) stay can be extended by ATIR if an application for stay is filed before ATIR within the initial thirty-day period — ATIR may grant stay for a further period not exceeding six months under Section 131(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. If the appeal is still pending after six months of ATIR stay, recovery proceedings may resume unless the taxpayer obtains relief from the High Court. Applications for stay before the High Court are filed as writ petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, where the taxpayer argues that coercive recovery would cause irreparable harm and that the appeal presents a prima facie case. High Courts in Pakistan — particularly the Islamabad High Court and Lahore High Court — have robust tax writ petition practices and frequently grant interim stays in cases involving substantial disputed amounts or clear errors of law in the impugned order.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Income Tax Return Declaration (Pakistan)
An Income Tax Return Declaration for Pakistan — a formal declaration accompanying an income tax return filed with the Federal Board of Revenue under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, confirming the accuracy of declared income, assets, and liabilities for a given tax year.
Advance Tax Declaration (Pakistan)
An Advance Tax Declaration for Pakistan — a formal declaration submitted to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) confirming estimated income and advance tax payments under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, Sections 147 and 237.
Legal Notice (Pakistan)
A Legal Notice for Pakistan — a formal pre-litigation communication sent by an advocate on behalf of a claimant to a party in breach of a legal obligation, governed by the Civil Procedure Code 1908 and the Limitation Act 1908, demanding specific action or payment before court proceedings are commenced.