Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya)
Client and Employee Non-Solicitation Covenant — Law of Contract Act Cap. 23
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT
This Non-Solicitation Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into on [Effective Date] between:
1. PARTIES
1.1 Employer: [Employer Name], registered with the Business Registration Service of Kenya under No. [BRS Reg No], with registered address at [Employer Address] ("Employer").
1.2 Restricted Party: [Restricted Party Name], holder of National ID / Passport No. [ID/Passport No], who held the position of [Role] with the Employer ("Restricted Party").
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 In the course of the Restricted Party's engagement as [Role], the Restricted Party developed close relationships with clients and colleagues of the Employer and had access to confidential information about the Employer's business.
2.2 The Employer has legitimate proprietary interests in maintaining its client relationships and workforce stability, and the Restricted Party agrees that the restrictions in this Agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect those interests under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
3. CONSIDERATION
In consideration of [Consideration] — [Consideration Amount] — and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Restricted Party acknowledges, the Restricted Party agrees to the restrictions set out in this Agreement.
4. DATA PROTECTION AND CONFIDENTIALITY
4.1 The Restricted Party shall return all confidential information belonging to the Employer on termination of engagement and shall not retain or use client personal data for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement.
4.2 The Restricted Party's obligations regarding personal data are subject to the Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019 and the Data Protection (General) Regulations 2021, administered by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC).
5. REMEDIES
5.1 The Restricted Party acknowledges that breach of this Agreement would cause irreparable harm to the Employer. The Employer is entitled to seek urgent injunctive relief from [Dispute Forum] without the need to prove actual damage, in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity.
5.2 The Employer may additionally claim damages, account of profits, and liquidated damages of KES [Liquidated Damages] per proven breach as a genuine pre-estimate of loss under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
6. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 Governing Law: This Agreement is governed by the laws of Kenya, including the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 where applicable.
6.2 Dispute Resolution: Any dispute shall be referred to [Dispute Forum] after a 14-day good-faith negotiation period.
6.3 Severability: Any provision found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be severed; the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
6.4 Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties on the subject of non-solicitation.
6.5 Amendment: No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both Parties.
7. EXECUTION
The Parties have signed this Non-Solicitation Agreement on the date first written above.
Employer
________________
Signature
Date: ________________
Restricted Party
________________
Signature
Date: ________________
What Is a Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya)?
A Non-Solicitation Agreement in Kenya sets out the rights, duties and consideration binding the parties to it.
The Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 governs the formation, validity, and enforcement of Non-Solicitation Agreements in Kenya. For a non-solicitation clause to be binding, Section 2 of Cap. 23 requires offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity of parties, and legality of purpose. The doctrine of restraint of trade received into Kenyan law through Section 3(1) of the Judicature Act Cap. 8 applies to non-solicitation obligations, but courts apply a more permissive reasonableness standard than for full non-compete clauses because the restriction on the individual's freedom of trade is more narrowly circumscribed.
The Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 establishes the statutory framework for employment relationships in Kenya and is read alongside the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 when interpreting post-employment non-solicitation obligations contained in employment contracts. The Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC), established under Article 162 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act No. 20 of 2011, has exclusive jurisdiction over non-solicitation disputes arising from employment relationships. The ELRC has consistently enforced well-drafted non-solicitation clauses covering specific named clients and senior employees, provided the restriction is time-limited and proportionate to the employer's legitimate interest in protecting its client base.
Kenyan courts distinguish between passive receipt of business from a former employer's client — which is generally not a breach of a non-solicitation covenant — and active solicitation, which involves deliberately approaching former clients to divert their custom. This distinction follows English common law authorities received through Section 3(1) of the Judicature Act Cap. 8, including cases such as Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80. Where a former employee sets up a competing business and former clients voluntarily migrate without any active solicitation, a non-solicitation clause may not have been breached — but a Non-Compete Agreement would provide stronger protection in such circumstances.
In the financial services sector, non-solicitation obligations have additional regulatory dimensions. The Capital Markets Authority (CMA), established under the Capital Markets Act Cap. 485A, and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), established under the Central Bank of Kenya Act Cap. 491, expect licensed firms to have appropriate arrangements — including contractual protections — to maintain client relationships and prevent the misuse of confidential client data by departing staff. The Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019, administered by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC), applies where non-solicitation is predicated on the use of client personal data: a departing employee who uses a downloaded client list to solicit former clients may be liable not only for breach of contract under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 but also for unlawful processing of personal data under Section 25 of the Data Protection Act.
Forms-legal.com provides this Kenya Non-Solicitation Agreement as a specifically drafted, Kenya-law compliant template for employers, businesses, and advisers seeking to protect client relationships and workforce stability following the departure of key personnel.
When Do You Need a Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya)?
A Non-Solicitation Agreement in Kenya is required in a range of employment and commercial situations where an employer or business owner needs to protect established client relationships, key staff, and supplier connections from being diverted by a departing employee, contractor, or business associate.
A Non-Solicitation Agreement is needed when hiring or retaining a customer-facing employee — such as a sales executive, relationship manager, account manager, or business development officer — who will develop close relationships with the company's key clients over the course of their employment. In Nairobi's competitive financial services, telecommunications, FMCG, and professional services sectors, the risk of a departing employee soliciting major clients to follow them to a competitor or a new venture is a recognised commercial threat that Non-Solicitation Agreements under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 are designed to address.
A Non-Solicitation Agreement is required when engaging a contractor, consultant, or freelancer who will interact directly with the company's clients or who will be introduced to existing client relationships as part of the service delivery. In the absence of an employment relationship governed by the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007, the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 provides the sole basis for post-engagement obligations, making a written Non-Solicitation Agreement the primary protective mechanism.
A Non-Solicitation Agreement is necessary when a senior manager or director who has recruited and developed the company's talent pool decides to leave. An employee non-solicitation clause — prohibiting the departing executive from inducing colleagues to follow them to a new employer — protects the company's investment in training and team stability, and is routinely enforced by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) where the restriction is reasonable in scope and duration.
A Non-Solicitation Agreement is required as part of a business sale or acquisition where the seller interacted closely with the acquired business's clients and has the goodwill to attract those clients to a new enterprise. In conjunction with a Non-Compete Agreement, a non-solicitation clause in the business sale documentation confirms the purchaser retains the client relationships that form the core of the goodwill acquired under the transaction.
A Non-Solicitation Agreement is needed when a franchise arrangement terminates, to prevent the former franchisee from actively soliciting the franchisor's existing customers, suppliers, or other franchisees within the network, consistent with the franchise agreement and the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
What to Include in Your Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya)
A valid and enforceable Non-Solicitation Agreement in Kenya under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 must include the following key elements.
Parties: Full legal names and addresses of both parties. Where the employer is a company, the Business Registration Service (BRS) registration number and registered office address should be stated. Capacity to contract under Section 11 of the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 must be confirmed for both parties.
Definition of Solicitation: A precise definition of what constitutes prohibited solicitation. Kenyan courts apply a distinction between active solicitation — making direct approaches, sending communications, or using personal connections to divert business — and passive receipt of unsolicited contact from former clients. The definition should be clear enough that a court can determine whether specific conduct constitutes a breach, and should expressly cover digital communications, social media approaches, and indirect solicitation through third parties.
Protected Clients and Customers: Identification of the clients, customers, or categories of client covered by the restriction. The restriction may cover all clients with whom the restricted party had material contact during the final 12 months of employment, or a specific list of named key accounts. Overly broad definitions covering all clients of the business — regardless of whether the restricted party had any contact with them — risk being found unreasonable by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) as an unjustified restraint of trade under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
Protected Employees: An employee non-solicitation clause restricts the departing party from soliciting, recruiting, or inducing colleagues to leave the employer's service. The clause should specify the categories of employee covered — typically restricted to employees above a certain seniority level or in specific roles — to avoid an overbroad restriction that catches even casual contacts with former colleagues.
Duration: The period for which the restriction applies after the termination date. Kenyan courts routinely enforce non-solicitation durations of 6 to 18 months where the restriction is otherwise reasonable. The duration should be commensurate with the time realistically needed for the employer to re-establish the protected relationships with a replacement employee, and should be expressed as commencing from the effective date of termination.
Consideration: The benefit provided to the restricted party in exchange for accepting the restriction. Non-Solicitation Agreements signed at commencement of employment are supported by the offer of employment as consideration. Mid-employment Non-Solicitation Agreements require fresh consideration under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23, such as a salary increase, promotion, or one-off payment, to be enforceable. In a business sale context, the purchase price constitutes the consideration flowing to the seller.
Data Protection Obligations: Where the non-solicitation restriction is linked to the use of client personal data, the agreement should incorporate obligations consistent with the Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019, administered by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC). The restricted party should be expressly prohibited from retaining, copying, or using client data obtained during the employment or engagement, and should be required to return or delete all such data on termination under the Data Protection (General) Regulations 2021.
Remedies and Enforcement: The agreement should specify remedies for breach, including the employer's right to seek interlocutory injunctive relief from the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) or the High Court of Kenya without proof of actual damage, as well as claims for damages, account of profits, and delivery up of confidential documents. A liquidated damages clause — specifying a pre-agreed sum per breach — may be included if it represents a genuine pre-estimate of loss rather than a penalty under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
Governing Law and Dispute Resolution: The agreement should be governed by the laws of Kenya. Disputes arising from employment Non-Solicitation Agreements are heard by the ELRC; commercial disputes are heard by the High Court of Kenya, with the option of referring disputes to the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) under its Commercial Arbitration Rules 2015.
Forms-legal.com offers this Kenya Non-Solicitation Agreement template as a practical, country-specific starting point. Employers in regulated industries — including financial services, insurance, and capital markets — should seek guidance from an advocate admitted to the Roll of Advocates of the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) to confirm full compliance with applicable sector regulations.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya) (Kenya) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/kenya/employment/contracts/non-solicitation-agreement-kenya
"Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya) (Kenya)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/kenya/employment/contracts/non-solicitation-agreement-kenya.
@misc{formslegal-non-solicitation-agreement-kenya,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Non-Solicitation Agreement (Kenya) (Kenya)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/kenya/employment/contracts/non-solicitation-agreement-kenya}},
note = {Free legal document template}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
A Non-Solicitation Agreement and a Non-Compete Agreement are related but distinct contractual protections under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 in Kenya. A Non-Compete Agreement broadly restricts the former employee or contractor from engaging in specified competing business activities — for example, working for a direct competitor or establishing a rival enterprise within a defined geographic area and time period. A Non-Solicitation Agreement is more targeted: it prohibits the restricted party from actively approaching specific protected relationships — such as the employer's clients, customers, employees, or suppliers — to divert their business or employment, while permitting the restricted party to work for a competitor generally. Kenyan courts, including the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC), apply a more permissive reasonableness standard to non-solicitation obligations than to broader non-compete clauses, because the restriction on the restricted party's freedom to work is more limited. Employers seeking maximum protection typically combine both types of agreement alongside a Non-Disclosure Agreement, creating layered contractual safeguards against the exploitation of business relationships and confidential information following the departure of key personnel.
There is no statutory maximum duration for Non-Solicitation Agreements under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 or the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007. Kenyan courts apply a reasonableness standard, and the enforceability of the duration depends on the seniority of the restricted party, the nature of the protected relationships, and the time realistically needed for the employer to re-establish those relationships through replacement personnel. The Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) routinely enforces non-solicitation periods of 6 to 18 months for customer-facing employees and managers. Restrictions of 24 months may be enforced where the restricted party held genuinely senior client-facing roles with deep personal client relationships. Restrictions exceeding 24 months in the employment context face judicial scrutiny and are more likely to be challenged successfully. In the business sale context, non-solicitation obligations of 3 to 5 years accompanying a genuine sale of goodwill are more readily enforced by Kenyan courts, because the seller receives consideration reflecting the value of the client relationships being protected. Employers should draft the duration carefully and ensure it is proportionate to the legitimate business interest to maximise enforceability before the ELRC.
Under Kenyan law, a standard Non-Solicitation Agreement governs active solicitation — deliberate approaches by the restricted party to former clients to divert their business — and generally does not cover passive receipt of unsolicited business. Following English common law authorities received into Kenyan law through Section 3(1) of the Judicature Act Cap. 8, Kenyan courts draw a distinction between a former employee who actively contacts, approaches, or targets former clients to secure their business, and a former client who independently and without any approach from the restricted party chooses to follow the employee to a new employer. The latter scenario is generally not a breach of a standard non-solicitation clause. However, if the agreement is drafted to prohibit not only solicitation but also the acceptance of business from protected clients — regardless of who initiated the contact — then passive receipt may constitute a breach, subject to the reasonableness test applied by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC). Employers who wish to protect against passive receipt of business should include explicit language covering acceptance of business and should note that such broader restrictions are subject to closer judicial scrutiny on reasonableness grounds.
Yes, a Non-Solicitation Agreement can be enforced against a contractor in Kenya, and in some respects the enforcement position is more straightforward than for employees. For employees, the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) applies constitutional protections for workers' rights alongside the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23, and scrutinises non-solicitation clauses for fairness under the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007. For independent contractors, the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 applies exclusively: there is no statutory employment protection overlay, and the court's analysis focuses on whether the restraint is reasonable as between commercial parties. Contractor Non-Solicitation Agreements are therefore somewhat easier to enforce where the contractor entered into the agreement voluntarily and with full understanding of its terms. That said, if a contractor is found by a Kenyan court to have been a de facto employee — applying the tests in the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 and ELRC jurisprudence regarding sham self-employment — the court may apply employment law standards to the enforcement of the non-solicitation clause. Contractors should be clearly identified as independent contractors in the agreement, and the distinction should be maintained in practice.
Breach of a Non-Solicitation Agreement in Kenya entitles the employer to several remedies under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Civil Procedure Act Cap. 21. The primary remedy most employers seek is an urgent interlocutory injunction from the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) or the High Court of Kenya, ordering the former employee to immediately cease the solicitation activity pending a full hearing. Kenyan courts apply the balance-of-convenience test when granting interlocutory injunctions in non-solicitation cases, considering: whether the employer has a serious question to be tried regarding the validity and breach of the restriction; whether damages would be an adequate remedy; and whether the balance of convenience favours granting or refusing the injunction. In addition to injunctive relief, the employer may claim damages for proven loss of client revenue caused by the breach, or an account of profits made by the former employee through the solicited business. If the agreement contains a liquidated damages clause specifying a pre-agreed sum per client or per breach, the employer may claim that amount if it is a genuine pre-estimate of loss and not a penalty under Cap. 23. Employers should gather evidence of the solicitation — including written communications, emails, and witness statements — before bringing proceedings.
Yes, a Non-Solicitation Agreement in Kenya can include an employee non-solicitation clause — commonly known as a non-poaching or anti-team-move clause — that prohibits the departing employee from inducing, recruiting, or encouraging former colleagues to leave the employer and join a competing business. The Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) and the High Court of Kenya have enforced such clauses where they are reasonable in scope. A reasonable employee non-solicitation clause typically: covers only employees above a certain seniority level (for example, managers and above) or those in specific key roles; applies for a defined period of 6 to 12 months post-termination; and is limited to active inducement rather than prohibiting all contact with former colleagues. Overly broad clauses — for example, prohibiting any contact with any former colleague at any level — are more vulnerable to challenge as an unreasonable restraint on freedom of association under Article 36 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. An employee non-solicitation clause should be carefully differentiated from a general non-compete clause, and the consideration provided in exchange for the restriction should be documented clearly in the agreement under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Non-Compete Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Non-Compete Agreement restricting an employee or contractor from engaging in competing business activities after the end of their engagement, enforceable under the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007.
Non-Disclosure Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Non-Disclosure Agreement protecting confidential business information, governed by the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019, enforceable in Kenya courts.
Employment Contract (Kenya)
A Kenya Employment Contract setting out terms and conditions of employment, compliant with the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007, NSSF Act 2013, SHIF Act 2024, and the Housing Levy obligations.
Confidentiality Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Confidentiality Agreement (mutual or one-way) protecting trade secrets, business information, and personal data, compliant with the Law of Contract Act Cap. 23 and the Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019.
Independent Contractor Agreement (Kenya)
A Kenya Independent Contractor Agreement clearly establishing a service relationship — not employment — under the Employment Act No. 11 of 2007, Income Tax Act Cap. 470, and Data Protection Act No. 24 of 2019.