Probation Review Form (Hong Kong)
Probation Review Form
PROBATION REVIEW FORM
Employee: [Employee Name] ID: [Employee ID]
Job Title: [Job Title] Department: [Department]
Employer: [Employer Name]
Reviewer: [Reviewer Name]
Employment Start Date: [Start Date]
Probation End Date: [Probation End Date]
Review Date: [Review Date]
Performance Assessment
SECTION 1: PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Job Knowledge / Technical Competence: [Job Knowledge Rating]
Quality of Work: [Work Quality Rating]
Attendance and Punctuality: [Attendance Rating]
Teamwork and Interpersonal Skills: [Teamwork Rating]
Overall Performance Summary:
[Performance Summary]
Performance Concerns (if any):
[Concerns]
Probation Outcome
SECTION 2: PROBATION OUTCOME
Decision: [Probation Outcome]
Confirmation effective date: [Confirmation Date]
Salary upon confirmation: [Post Confirmation Salary]
This decision is made in accordance with the terms of the Employee's employment contract and the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) of Hong Kong.
Employee Comments
SECTION 3: EMPLOYEE COMMENTS AND SELF-ASSESSMENT
[Employee Comments]
Employee signature confirms receipt of this form and the outcome communicated. It does not necessarily indicate agreement with all assessments.
Reviewer / Line Manager
________________
Signature
Employee
________________
Signature
HR Representative
________________
Signature
What Is a Probation Review Form (Hong Kong)?
A Probation Review Form in Hong Kong captures the particulars required for the filing or submission it supports.
Probation periods are a standard feature of Hong Kong employment practice and are recognised by the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57). Section 6(3A) of Cap. 57 provides that during a probationary period of not more than 12 months, either party may terminate with just 7 days' notice — a significantly shorter obligation than the standard contractual notice period. This provision gives employers flexibility to exit the employment relationship during probation if the employee does not prove suitable, and the probation review form provides the documented basis for that decision.
Hong Kong law does not require employers to use a formal probation review form. However, the Labour Tribunal — a specialist tribunal within the District Court system that handles employment disputes involving amounts up to HK$500,000 — regularly hears cases where employees challenge termination at the end of probation. Where the employer has no written probation review record, it is difficult to demonstrate that the termination was for genuine performance or conduct reasons rather than a prohibited reason under Section 32K of Cap. 57 or a discriminatory reason under the anti-discrimination ordinances (Caps. 480, 487, 527, 602). The Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) Section 32K prohibits dismissal where the principal reason is to deprive the employee of a statutory entitlement — for example, dismissing an employee at the end of probation to prevent the accrual of annual leave entitlements or MPF contributions.
For listed companies on the HKEX, strong HR processes including documented probation reviews contribute to the board's oversight of human capital management, which the HKEX Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting Guide identifies as a material governance matter requiring disclosure.
The Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485) — administered by the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA) — provides that MPF contributions are not required for employees within the first 60 days of employment. For employees who are being assessed at the end of a probation period that spans the 60-day threshold, the employer must ensure MPF enrolment has been completed with an approved trustee before the review is conducted. The Labour Department — responsible for enforcing the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) — publishes a Guide to the Employment Ordinance that sets out the minimum standards applicable during probation periods, including wage protection and leave accrual under Sections 33 and 41 of Cap. 57.
The Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) — established under Section 63 of the Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480) — publishes a Code of Practice on Employment that addresses performance assessment and probation reviews as areas of potential discriminatory risk. Employers must requires probation review criteria are objective, consistently applied, and free from bias related to sex, pregnancy, disability under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), family status under the Family Status Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 527), or race under the Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602).
For listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong (HKEX), governance requirements under the Main Board Listing Rules and the HKEX Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting Guide identify human capital management — including structured recruitment and probation processes — as material matters requiring board oversight and potential ESG disclosure. Forms-legal.com provides Hong Kong employers with a professionally structured Probation Review Form that satisfies Labour Tribunal evidentiary standards and creates a fair, transparent, and legally defensible assessment process for new employees.
When Do You Need a Probation Review Form (Hong Kong)?
A Probation Review Form in Hong Kong should be completed at the end of every employee's probation period, regardless of whether the employer intends to confirm, extend, or terminate the employment.
End of initial probation period: The primary use — a thorough review conducted at or before the stated probation end date. The review should be scheduled at least two weeks before the probation end date to allow time for the formal meeting, the written form to be completed, and the outcome letter to be issued before the probation period expires. Allowing the probation period to pass without a formal review creates uncertainty about the employee's status and may imply confirmation by default.
End of extended probation period: Where the probation period has previously been extended by a Probation Extension Letter, a second probation review form should be completed at the end of the extended period to record the final assessment and outcome. The extended review form should cross-reference the original extension letter and document the employee's performance against the targets set in that letter.
Where termination at end of probation is being considered: A probation review form is particularly important where the employer is considering not confirming the employee. The form provides the structured documentation that supports the termination decision and demonstrates to the Labour Tribunal that the decision was based on assessed performance rather than a prohibited reason. The form should be completed before the termination decision is communicated to the employee, not retrospectively.
Where confirmation with conditions is being considered: Where the employer wishes to confirm the employee subject to specific ongoing performance conditions — for example, achieving a sales target within the first three months after confirmation — the probation review form documents the conditional nature of the confirmation and the agreed conditions.
Where the employee has raised a grievance during probation: If the employee has raised a grievance — about working conditions, conduct of a colleague, or the employer's treatment — the probation review form for that employee must be completed with particular care to confirm the review outcome is not influenced by the grievance. A review outcome that penalises the employee for raising a legitimate grievance may constitute victimisation under the anti-discrimination ordinances.
What to Include in Your Probation Review Form (Hong Kong)
A Hong Kong Probation Review Form should contain the following elements to support a legally defensible, fair, and consistent probation assessment process.
Employee and reviewer identification: Employee's full name, HKID number, employee number, job title, department, and date of joining. Reviewer's full name and title. The probation period dates — start date, originally stated end date, and actual review date — should be clearly recorded. If this is a review of an extended probation period, the extension letter date and extended end date should also be noted.
Performance objectives assessment: For each objective communicated to the employee at the commencement of employment (or revised during probation), the form should record: the objective as stated; the results achieved; and a rating against a defined scale. Ratings should be based on specific, documented examples — not general impressions. For quantitative objectives (sales targets, production volumes, quality metrics), the target and actual should be stated numerically.
Competency assessment: Assessment of behavioural competencies essential for the role — technical skills, communication, teamwork, initiative, professional conduct, and client or parties management. Each competency should be rated against defined descriptors. For Hong Kong employment law purposes, competency ratings must be applied consistently across all probationary employees in comparable roles to avoid discrimination claims.
Attendance and punctuality record: A factual record of absences, late arrivals, and early departures during the probation period, including the dates and reasons where known. Attendance issues that have been discussed with the employee during probation should be cross-referenced to any written warnings or informal feedback provided. Statutory sick leave taken in accordance with Section 33 of Cap. 57 should not be recorded as an adverse factor.
Conduct and professionalism assessment: An assessment of the employee's professional conduct — adherence to company policies, relationships with colleagues and management, communication style, and compliance with health and safety requirements under the Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance (Cap. 509). Any conduct issues that arose during probation and the employer's response should be documented.
Training and development assessment: A record of any training provided during probation and the employee's engagement with and progress through that training. Where skills or knowledge gaps were identified, the employee's efforts to address them should be assessed.
Self-assessment section: Space for the employee to record their own assessment of their performance, their key achievements during probation, and any factors that affected their performance. Under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486), employees have data access rights to their personnel records — including probation review forms — and the self-assessment section creates a more complete and balanced record.
Overall assessment and recommendation: The reviewer's overall assessment of the employee's suitability for the role, and a recommendation to: confirm employment (with or without conditions); extend the probation period (where contractually permitted and with the employee's agreement); or terminate the employment with the applicable notice under Section 6(3A) of Cap. 57. The recommendation should be stated with specific reasons tied to the assessment above.
Outcome decision: The formal decision by the authorised decision-maker (typically the HR Director or Department Head) — confirmation, extension, or termination — with the effective date of confirmation or the termination notice period. The decision should be countersigned by a second-level manager to confirm consistency with treatment of other probationary employees.
Employee acknowledgement: Signature by the employee confirming receipt of the review form. If the employee declines to sign, the reviewer should note this on the form and send a copy by email. The employee's refusal to sign does not invalidate the review but should be documented as part of the record. The forms-legal.com Probation Review Form (Hong Kong) template covers the mandatory elements under Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57).
Sources & Citations
Statutory citations link to official government sources.
- Hong Kong employment practice and are recognised by the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
- The Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
- The Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485)HK official
- Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
- Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480)HK official
- Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- Family Status Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 527)HK official
- Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602)HK official
- Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance (Cap. 509)HK official
- Under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486)HK official
- Hong Kong) template covers the mandatory elements under Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Probation Review Form (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/probation-review-form-hong-kong
"Probation Review Form (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/probation-review-form-hong-kong.
@misc{formslegal-probation-review-form-hong-kong,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Probation Review Form (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/probation-review-form-hong-kong}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Hong Kong law does not specify a statutory probation period — it is determined by the employment contract. Typical practice in Hong Kong is 1–3 months for junior roles, 3–6 months for managerial positions, and up to 6 months for senior or executive roles.
Under s.6(3A) of the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), the reduced minimum notice provision (7 days) applies during a probationary period of 'not more than 12 months'. This means a probation period of more than 12 months does not benefit from the reduced notice provisions of s.6(3A), and the full contractual notice period applies instead. Employers should therefore keep initial probation periods at or under 12 months.
A probation period is a legitimate tool for employers to assess whether a new hire is suitable for the role. It should not be extended indefinitely — if an employee is confirmed and then a second 'probation' imposed later, this is likely not a lawful probation and does not attract the reduced notice provisions.
A probation review should assess whether the employee has met the performance standards and competency requirements set out at the start of employment. Key areas typically assessed include: (1) Technical competence — ability to perform the core tasks of the role; (2) Quality of work — accuracy, attention to detail, and meeting standards; (3) Productivity — output relative to expectations; (4) Attitude and conduct — professional behaviour, teamwork, and compliance with company policies; (5) Learning and adaptability — ability to absorb training, take on feedback, and develop in the role; (6) Attendance and punctuality — compliance with working hours and leave policies.
For Hong Kong-specific considerations: the employer should confirm performance targets were clearly communicated at the start of the probation period. If targets were not properly set or communicated, it is more difficult to justify a negative probation review outcome. Any performance concerns raised during the review should have been discussed with the employee beforehand — a probation review should not be the first time the employee hears about serious concerns.
An employee may refuse to sign a probation review form. The employer cannot compel the employee to sign — a signature on a performance document is typically an acknowledgement of receipt, not an agreement with the content. Most probation review forms include a note that the signature indicates receipt and understanding, not necessarily agreement.
If an employee refuses to sign, the employer should note this on the form (e.g. 'Employee declined to sign but was given a copy on [date]') and retain the original signed by the reviewer. The employer should send the employee a copy by email or in writing to create a record of delivery.
The employee's refusal to sign does not invalidate the review or prevent the employer from making a decision based on it. However, if the employer relies on the review to justify a subsequent termination, the employee's refusal to sign may be raised at the Labour Tribunal. A thorough written record of the review meeting discussion — including any concerns raised by the employee — is therefore important.
If an employee fails probation and the employer decides not to confirm the employment, the employer must provide the applicable notice period (minimum 7 days during probation under s.6(3A) of Cap. 57, or the contractual period if longer) or pay wages in lieu of notice.
The termination must not be for any prohibited reason under s.32K of Cap. 57 — for example, an employer cannot fail an employee's probation as a pretext for dismissal that is actually motivated by pregnancy, illness, or the employee having exercised a statutory right. Anti-discrimination protections (Caps. 480, 487, 527, 602) also apply during the probation period.
If the employee has been employed for at least 24 months of continuous service (which is rare but possible on a very extended probation), dismissal by reason of redundancy would trigger severance payment obligations under s.31G of Cap. 57.
From a practical standpoint, employers should confirm the probation review is conducted before or by the probation end date. Allowing the employee to continue working past the probation end date without issuing a confirmation letter may create an implied confirmation, making subsequent dismissal more complex.
Under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485), both the employer and the employee must make mandatory MPF contributions for any 'relevant employee' — which includes probationary employees — from the first day of employment. However, Section 7A of Cap. 485 provides a 60-day exemption period for new employees: if the employee's employment terminates within 60 days of commencement, neither the employer nor the employee is required to make MPF contributions for that employee.
This 60-day exemption is significant for probation management. Employers who conduct a probation review at the end of a short initial probation period of less than 60 days and decide not to confirm the employee may not need to enrol the employee in an MPF scheme at all, provided the termination occurs within 60 days. However, if the probation period extends beyond 60 days, the employer must have enrolled the employee with an approved MPF trustee — such as HSBC Provident Fund Trustee, Manulife Provident Funds Trust, or AIA Company — and commenced contributions. Failure to enrol and make timely contributions is an offence under Cap. 485 enforced by the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA), with penalties including fines and surcharges. The probation review form should note the employee's MPF enrolment status as part of the administrative record.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Anti-Harassment Policy (Hong Kong)
An Anti-Harassment Policy for Hong Kong prohibiting workplace harassment including sexual harassment under the Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480) and the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487).
Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong)
A formal complaint of disability discrimination addressed to the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), describing the discriminatory act, respondent details, and requested remedy.
Disciplinary Hearing Invitation (Hong Kong)
A Disciplinary Hearing Invitation formally notifies an employee in Hong Kong of a disciplinary hearing, the allegations against them, their right to be accompanied, and the potential outcomes. A fair disciplinary process is essential under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) to avoid claims of unreasonable dismissal before the Labour Tribunal or the District Court.
Drug and Alcohol Policy (Hong Kong)
A Drug and Alcohol Policy sets out an employer's rules in Hong Kong regarding the use, possession, and testing for drugs and alcohol in the workplace. The policy supports a safe working environment under the Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance (Cap. 509), addresses testing procedures, and sets out disciplinary consequences, while balancing employee privacy rights under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486).
Employee Handbook (Hong Kong)
An Employee Handbook for Hong Kong providing a comprehensive reference of company policies, procedures, and employee entitlements in compliance with the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57).