Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong)
DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT
Under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)
Date: [Complaint Date]
To: Equal Opportunities Commission, Hong Kong
Complainant: [Complainant Name] (HKID: [Complainant HKID])
Address: [Complainant Address] Tel: [Complainant Phone]
1. RESPONDENT
1.1 Name: [Respondent Name]
1.2 Address: [Respondent Address]
1.3 Relationship to Complainant: [Respondent Relationship]
2. DETAILS OF COMPLAINT
2.1 Disability: [Disability]
2.2 Type of Discrimination: [Discrimination Type]
2.3 Date(s) of Incident(s): [Incident Dates]
2.4 Description of Conduct Complained Of:
[Incident Description]
2.5 Prior Internal Complaints: [Prior Complaints]
3. REMEDY SOUGHT
[Remedy Sought]
4. DECLARATION
I declare that the information provided in this complaint is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that this complaint is subject to the EOC's investigation and conciliation procedures under the Equal Opportunities Commission Ordinance (Cap. 480) and the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487).
Complainant
________________
Signature
What Is a Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong)?
A Hong Kong Disability Discrimination Complaint is a formal written complaint filed with the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), alleging unlawful discrimination, harassment, or vilification on the ground of disability in an area covered by the Ordinance. The complaint sets out the identity of the complainant and the respondent, the nature of the alleged discriminatory conduct, and the remedy sought.
The Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) was enacted in 1995 and applies throughout Hong Kong to discrimination on the ground of disability in employment, education, access to premises, and the provision of goods, services, and facilities. The DDO defines 'disability' very broadly under section 2 of Cap. 487 to encompass physical disabilities, sensory impairments, intellectual disabilities, psychiatric conditions, and chronic illnesses — including past, present, future, and imputed disabilities. The definition covers total or partial loss of a bodily function, loss of a part of the body, the presence of organisms capable of causing disease (including HIV/AIDS), malformation or disfigurement, disorders affecting learning or behaviour, and psychiatric illnesses under Cap. 487.
The Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) was established under the Equal Opportunities Commission Ordinance as the statutory body responsible for receiving and investigating complaints under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) and three other ordinances: the Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480), the Family Status Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 527), and the Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602). The EOC's principal functions are to receive complaints, investigate them, and where appropriate, conciliate between parties to achieve a mutually acceptable resolution. Complaints must be filed within 24 months of the last act of discrimination.
Direct disability discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) occurs when a person treats someone with a disability less favourably than they would treat a person without a disability in comparable circumstances. In the employment context, direct discrimination includes refusing to recruit a qualified candidate because of their disability, dismissing an employee on grounds of disability or disability-related illness, demoting or denying promotion on grounds of disability, and applying different or more burdensome conditions of employment to a person with a disability.
Indirect discrimination under Cap. 487 occurs when an employer or other person applies a condition or requirement that applies equally to all persons but has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons with a particular disability and cannot be justified as reasonably necessary for the achievement of a legitimate aim. Harassment on the ground of disability — conduct that creates a hostile, intimidating, humiliating, or offensive environment — is also prohibited under Cap. 487. Vilification — public acts that incite hatred or contempt on grounds of disability — is also unlawful under the Ordinance.
The EOC has published codes of practice on employment and education under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) that provide guidance to employers and educational institutions on their obligations. These codes are admissible in evidence before the District Court and are taken into account by courts when assessing whether conduct was discriminatory. Employers with disabled employees or job applicants are strongly encouraged to consult the EOC guidance and implement a disability inclusion policy.
When Do You Need a Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong)?
A Hong Kong Disability Discrimination Complaint should be filed with the Equal Opportunities Commission when a person believes they have been subjected to unlawful discrimination, harassment, or vilification on the ground of disability in any area covered by the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487).
An employee who is dismissed, demoted, or subjected to adverse action by their employer because of a disability or disability-related illness — including cancer, HIV/AIDS, a psychiatric condition, or a physical impairment — should file a DDO complaint with the EOC. Employment discrimination complaints must be filed within 24 months of the last act of discrimination or the most recent act in a continuing course of discriminatory conduct.
A job applicant who is refused employment or who receives a conditional job offer (for example, conditional on passing a medical examination that is not justified by genuine occupational requirements) on the basis of their disability should file a complaint with the EOC. The DDO applies to the entire recruitment process, including job advertisements, shortlisting, interviews, and offers.
A student with a disability who is denied admission to an educational institution, excluded from programmes or activities, or denied reasonable accommodations by a school, university, or training provider in Hong Kong should file a complaint under the DDO. The EOC's Code of Practice on Education under the DDO provides detailed guidance for educational institutions on their obligations.
A person with a disability who is refused access to premises, denied services, or treated less favourably in the provision of goods or services by a shop, restaurant, transport operator, bank, insurance company, or government department should file a DDO complaint. The DDO applies to all service providers, including government bodies.
A person who is harassed on the ground of disability in the workplace — through offensive jokes, derogatory comments, unwanted questions about their medical condition, or conduct that creates an intimidating or hostile working environment related to their disability — should file a harassment complaint under the DDO.
Complaints must be filed within 24 months of the act complained of. Late complaints may be accepted in exceptional circumstances at the EOC's discretion, but complainants should not delay.
What to Include in Your Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong)
A formal Hong Kong Disability Discrimination Complaint to the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) must include the following key elements to be accepted by the EOC and to enable effective investigation and conciliation.
Complainant's details: Full legal name, Hong Kong Identity Card number or passport number, contact address, telephone number, and email address. The EOC uses these details to communicate with the complainant throughout the investigation and conciliation process under Cap. 487.
Respondent's details: The full legal name, address, and contact details of the person or organisation alleged to have discriminated. For employment complaints under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), the respondent is typically the employer company and the specific manager or supervisor who carried out the discriminatory act. Both the company and the individual may be named as respondents.
Nature of the disability: A clear description of the disability or medical condition — whether physical, sensory, intellectual, psychiatric, or a chronic illness covered by section 2 of Cap. 487 — how it affects the complainant, and whether it is a current, past, future, or imputed disability. The respondent's knowledge or perception of the disability is relevant to establishing the causal link between the disability and the discriminatory treatment.
Description of discriminatory acts: A chronological account of each incident of discrimination, harassment, or vilification under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), with dates, locations, persons present, specific words or actions, and the impact on the complainant. Documentary evidence — emails, medical certificates, dismissal notices, HR correspondence — should be listed and attached to strengthen the complaint.
Area of Cap. 487 engaged: The specific area of the Disability Discrimination Ordinance under which the complaint is made — employment, education, access to premises, or provision of goods and services. Different provisions of Cap. 487 apply in each area, and the EOC assesses the complaint according to the applicable provisions.
Remedy sought: A statement of the relief requested — written apology, financial compensation for injury to feelings and financial loss, reinstatement to employment, change in the respondent's policies, or staff training on disability discrimination under Cap. 487.
Limitation period: Confirmation that the complaint is filed within the 24-month limitation period prescribed by the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), citing the date of the most recent discriminatory act. Late complaints may be accepted at the EOC's discretion in exceptional circumstances. Related documents include the Race Discrimination Complaint, Employment Contract, and Discrimination Complaint Letter. Forms-legal.com provides a Disability Discrimination Complaint template covering all EOC requirements under Cap. 487.
Limitation Period and Filing Confirmation: The complaint must be filed within 24 months of the last act of discrimination or the most recent act in a continuing course of conduct under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487). The complainant should confirm the date of the last discriminatory act and calculate the limitation deadline. Late complaints may be accepted at the EOC discretion in exceptional circumstances, but complainants should not delay. The EOC complaint form must be signed by the complainant confirming the information is accurate and complete. Forms-legal.com provides a Disability Discrimination Complaint template covering all EOC requirements under Cap. 487, downloadable as PDF or Word. Related documents include the Race Discrimination Complaint under Cap. 602 and the Employment Contract governed by the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57).
The Equal Opportunities Commission publishes annual reports on complaint statistics under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), which provide useful benchmarks for the range of remedies awarded through conciliation and District Court proceedings in Hong Kong.
Sources & Citations
Statutory citations link to official government sources.
- Opportunities Commission (EOC) under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- The Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480)HK official
- Family Status Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 527)HK official
- Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602)HK official
- Direct disability discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- For employment complaints under the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)HK official
- Employment Contract governed by the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57)HK official
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/disability-discrimination-complaint-hong-kong
"Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/disability-discrimination-complaint-hong-kong.
@misc{formslegal-disability-discrimination-complaint-hong-kong,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Disability Discrimination Complaint (Hong Kong) (Hong Kong)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/hong-kong/employment/hr-forms/disability-discrimination-complaint-hong-kong}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Disability discrimination in Hong Kong is prohibited by the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), which was enacted in 1995 and has been amended several times since. The DDO applies to a wide range of activities including employment, education, access to premises, and provision of goods and services.
The DDO defines 'disability' broadly to include: total or partial loss of a bodily function; total or partial loss of a part of the body; the presence in the body of organisms causing or capable of causing disease or illness; the malfunction, malformation, or disfigurement of a part of the body; a disorder or malfunction that results in the person learning differently; a disorder, illness, or disease that affects the thought processes, perception of reality, emotions, or judgement, or that results in disturbed behaviour. The definition includes disabilities that currently exist, disabilities that existed in the past, disabilities that may exist in the future, or disabilities that people believe or impute to a person.
Direct disability discrimination under the DDO occurs when a person treats someone with a disability less favourably than they would treat a person without that disability in comparable circumstances. In employment, examples include: refusing to recruit a qualified candidate because of their disability; dismissing an employee because of their disability or illness; denying training or promotion opportunities on the basis of disability.
The Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) is the statutory body established under the Equal Opportunities Commission Ordinance (Cap. 480) to receive, investigate, and conciliate complaints of discrimination under the four anti-discrimination ordinances in Hong Kong, including the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487).
The complaint process involves the following steps:
1. Filing the complaint: A complainant can file a complaint with the EOC in writing (by completing the EOC's complaint form, submitting online via the EOC website, or writing a letter), by telephone, or in person at the EOC's offices. The complaint must be filed within 24 months of the last act of discrimination or harassment.
2. Initial assessment: The EOC reviews the complaint to assess whether it falls within the scope of the DDO and whether there is sufficient information to proceed. The EOC may request additional information or documentation from the complainant.
3. Investigation: If the complaint is accepted, the EOC may investigate the matter. Investigation involves gathering information from both parties, reviewing documents, and interviewing witnesses. The investigation process can take several months.
4. Conciliation: The EOC's primary role is to conciliate complaints — to assist the parties in reaching a mutually agreed settlement. Conciliation is conducted on a without-prejudice basis and the outcome is confidential. Many complaints are resolved through conciliation, with remedies such as apology, change of policy, financial compensation, or reinstatement.
5.
A person who has suffered disability discrimination in Hong Kong, whether in employment or in other contexts covered by the Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487), has access to several categories of remedy.
Through EOC conciliation: The most common route to remedy is through the EOC's conciliation process. Settlements reached through conciliation can include: a written apology from the respondent; financial compensation for injury to feelings, financial loss, or both; a commitment by the respondent to change its policies, practices, or procedures; reinstatement to employment; a training programme for the respondent's staff; or other measures designed to prevent future discrimination.
Through the District Court: If the EOC conciliation process is unsuccessful, or where the complainant chooses to pursue legal action independently (with or without EOC assistance), a civil claim can be brought in the District Court under the DDO. The District Court can award: damages for injury to feelings (including aggravated damages where the discriminatory act was particularly high-handed); financial loss (including loss of earnings and employment-related losses); injunctions ordering the respondent to refrain from discriminatory conduct; and orders requiring the respondent to take specific actions.
Hong Kong courts have awarded damages for injury to feelings in discrimination cases ranging from modest amounts to tens of thousands of HKD, depending on the severity and nature of the discrimination, the duration, and the impact on the complainant.
The concept of 'reasonable adjustment' — requiring employers to make changes to working arrangements, premises, or practices to accommodate employees with disabilities — exists in many jurisdictions (for example, the UK Equality Act 2010 imposes a statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments). The position under Hong Kong's Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) is more nuanced.
The DDO does not impose an explicit free-standing duty to make reasonable adjustments in the same terms as the UK legislation. However, the concepts of 'unjustifiable hardship' and 'reasonableness' play an important role in the DDO's framework. An employer who treats a disabled employee less favourably may be able to justify this treatment by demonstrating that the cost or difficulty of accommodation (the 'hardship' involved) is unjustifiable given the size and resources of the employer and the nature of the adjustment required.
The corollary is that where an adjustment is reasonable and would not cause unjustifiable hardship, an employer who fails to make that adjustment — and instead treats the disabled employee less favourably — is more likely to be found to have engaged in unjustifiable discrimination. In practice, the EOC and courts apply a reasonableness standard that, while not identical to the UK duty, expects employers of sufficient size and resources to consider and implement reasonable accommodations.
The Disability Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 487) does not prohibit all differential treatment of persons with disabilities — it prohibits unjustifiable discrimination. Several defences and justifications are available to respondents under Cap. 487, though the burden of proving justification rests on the respondent.
Unjustifiable hardship: An employer or service provider may argue that making an adjustment to accommodate a person with a disability would impose unjustifiable hardship. Section 2 of Cap. 487 defines 'unjustifiable hardship' by reference to factors including the financial circumstances of the respondent, the nature of the adjustment required, and the likely impact on the respondent's operations. Larger organisations with greater resources are expected to accommodate disabilities that would be genuinely burdensome for smaller employers.
Inherent requirements: An employer may be able to justify treating a person with a disability differently if the relevant physical or mental ability is an inherent requirement of the particular position. For example, a requirement that a pilot have unimpaired vision may be an inherent job requirement — but only if the employer can demonstrate that the requirement is genuinely necessary for the performance of the role and cannot be accommodated by reasonable adjustments.
Health and safety: An employer may be able to justify differential treatment on genuine health and safety grounds, provided the risk is real and not merely speculative and cannot be managed through reasonable accommodations.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Race Discrimination Complaint (EOC) (Hong Kong)
A formal complaint of race discrimination addressed to the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) under the Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602), describing the discriminatory act, respondent, and requested remedy.
Employment Contract (Hong Kong)
A comprehensive employment agreement for Hong Kong employees compliant with the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) and the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485). Covers continuous contract status, MPF contributions, statutory leave entitlements, notice periods, severance, and termination provisions.
418 Continuous Employment Confirmation (Hong Kong)
A letter confirming that an employee has met the 418 continuity of employment rule under Section 41A of the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), entitling them to statutory employment protections including severance pay, long service payment, and annual leave.