Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria)
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
THIS NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT is made on [Effective Date]
BETWEEN:
(1) [Employer Name] (CAC No. [Employer CAC Number]) of [Employer Address] (hereinafter referred to as the "Employer"); AND
(2) [Employee Name] of [Employee Address], employed as [Job Title] (hereinafter referred to as the "Employee").
RECITALS
A. The Employer carries on business in Nigeria and has legitimate business interests requiring protection, including: [Protected Interest].
B. In consideration of [Consideration], the Employee agrees to the restrictions set out in this Agreement.
1. NON-COMPETE RESTRICTION
1.1 The Employee agrees that during employment and for a period of [Restriction Period] following the termination of employment (for any reason), the Employee shall not, within the territory of [Territory], directly or indirectly engage in, be employed by, consult for, own, manage, operate, control, be connected with, or participate in the following activities: [Restricted Activities].
1.2 The restriction in clause 1.1 applies whether the Employee acts as principal, employee, director, partner, consultant, agent, or in any other capacity.
1.3 The restriction is limited to the protected interest described in the Recitals and does not prevent the Employee from engaging in any lawful occupation outside the restricted activities.
2. REASONABLENESS
2.1 The Employee acknowledges that the restrictions in this Agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect the Employer's legitimate business interests as set out in the Recitals, and that the geographical scope ([Territory]), restricted activities, and duration ([Restriction Period]) are no wider than reasonably necessary for that purpose under the restraint of trade principles applied by Nigerian courts.
2.2 If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court to be unenforceable in whole or in part, the parties authorise the court to sever the unreasonable portion while preserving the remainder to the fullest extent permitted under Nigerian law.
3. REMEDIES
3.1 The Employee acknowledges that breach of this Agreement would cause irreparable harm to the Employer for which monetary damages may not be an adequate remedy. The Employer is entitled to seek injunctive relief from the High Court of [Governing State] State or the Federal High Court, in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity, without the requirement to post a bond or other security.
4. GOVERNING LAW
4.1 This Agreement is governed by Nigerian law, including the restraint of trade doctrine as applied by the courts of [Governing State] State.
Signed by the parties on [Effective Date].
Employer (Authorised Signatory)
________________
Signature
Employee
________________
Signature
What Is a Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria)?
A Non-Compete Agreement in Nigeria sets the scope and duration of post-engagement competition restrictions agreed between the parties.
The foundational principle in Nigerian restraint of trade cases is that a covenant in restraint of trade is prima facie void, but will be upheld if the party seeking enforcement proves: (a) the existence of a legitimate protectable interest — such as trade secrets protected under common law, confidential client lists, or proprietary business methods developed at the employer's expense; (b) that the scope of the restraint (activities restricted, geographical area, and duration) is no wider than reasonably necessary to protect that interest; and (c) that the restraint is not injurious to the public interest. This three-part test mirrors the position in English law as articulated in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co [1894] AC 535, which the Court of Appeal of Nigeria and the Supreme Court of Nigeria have cited with approval in multiple judgments.
In the employment context, Nigerian courts distinguish between non-compete clauses operative during employment — enforceable as part of the duty of fidelity implied in every employment contract under the Labour Act (Cap L1, LFN 2004) and the common law — and post-employment restraints, which are scrutinised more strictly by the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) under Section 254C of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (Third Alteration). Post-employment non-competes are valid only where the employer has a genuine protectable interest beyond merely preventing competition. A clause so broad that it effectively bars the employee from earning a livelihood in their field will be struck down by the NICN or Court of Appeal as unreasonable restraint of trade. The Copyright Act (Cap C28, LFN 2004) and Patents and Designs Act (Cap P2, LFN 2004) provide additional statutory protections for the intellectual property underpinning many non-compete obligations.
A Non-Compete Agreement in Nigeria must be distinguished from a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) — which restricts disclosure of confidential information but does not bar competitive employment — and a Non-Solicitation Agreement, which prevents solicitation of the employer's clients or staff registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) under the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA 2020). A detailed post-employment protection strategy in Nigeria typically combines all three instruments, tailored to the employee's seniority, sector, and access to trade secrets.
The statutory and regulatory framework for Non-Compete Agreements in Nigeria includes: the Labour Act (Cap L1, LFN 2004) governing terms of employment; the National Industrial Court of Nigeria Act 2006 establishing the NICN's exclusive jurisdiction over employment disputes; the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA 2020) administered by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) for corporate party registration; the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA 2023) administered by the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) for personal data protection obligations; the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) under the Companies Income Tax Act (Cap C21, LFN 2004) (CITA) for tax treatment of compensation paid for non-compete obligations; the Stamp Duties Act (Cap S8, LFN 2004) for stamp duty assessment by FIRS on the agreement; and the Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023 for alternative dispute resolution at the Lagos Court of Arbitration (LCA). The Federal High Court of Nigeria has concurrent jurisdiction over non-compete disputes involving intellectual property under Section 251 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999.
When Do You Need a Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria)?
A Non-Compete Agreement in Nigeria is required in the following circumstances.
A Non-Compete Agreement is needed when an employer hires a senior manager, director, or technical specialist who will have access to trade secrets, proprietary formulas, client relationships, or strategic business plans, and the employer needs protection against the employee immediately joining a direct competitor upon resignation or dismissal.
A Non-Compete Agreement is required in the sale of a business, where the seller agrees not to start or join a competing business for a reasonable period after completing the sale. Nigerian courts view post-sale non-competes more favourably than post-employment non-competes because the seller receives full consideration for the goodwill being protected. The Court of Appeal has upheld post-sale non-competes of up to three years for regional businesses and up to five years for national businesses with established goodwill.
A Non-Compete Agreement is needed when a franchisor grants a franchise to a Nigerian franchisee under a Franchise Agreement regulated by the principles of Nigerian contract law and, where applicable, the Consumer Protection Council Act. The franchisor's non-compete clause protects the franchise system from former franchisees opening competing businesses using the franchisor's proprietary systems and methods.
A Non-Compete Agreement is required when an independent contractor — particularly a consultant, software developer, or business development agent — is given access to a client's proprietary methodologies, client databases, or market intelligence, and the client needs contractual protection against the contractor immediately deploying that knowledge for competing clients.
A Non-Compete Agreement is needed when a partnership deed or shareholders' agreement among the founding shareholders of a Nigerian company includes a restrictive covenant preventing outgoing partners or shareholders from competing with the company for a defined period after their exit.
Parties in Nigeria should prepare a Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Nigerian law, the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA) regulates corporate entities through the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC). The Labour Act (Cap L1 LFN 2004) and the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) govern employment disputes. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) 2019 and the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) protect personal data. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) administers tax obligations under the Companies Income Tax Act. The Federal High Court and state High Courts have jurisdiction over civil matters. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria)
A valid Nigeria Non-Compete Agreement must contain the following essential elements to withstand challenge before Nigerian courts.
Parties: Full legal names and addresses of the employer (or buyer) and the employee (or seller/contractor). For corporate employers, include the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) registration number under the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA 2020). Where the employer is a regulated entity — such as a bank licensed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act 2020 (BOFIA 2020), or a capital market operator licensed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Nigeria) — the regulatory licence reference should be stated.
Definition of Competitive Activity: A precise definition of the business activities the restricted party is prohibited from engaging in. Vague definitions risk being struck down by the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) under Section 254C of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (Third Alteration) or by the Court of Appeal as unreasonably broad. The definition should identify specific products, services, or market segments, referencing the employer's registered business objects under CAMA 2020.
Geographical Scope: The specific states, local government areas, or territories within which the restriction applies. The Supreme Court of Nigeria and the Court of Appeal have held that the geographical scope must correspond to where the employer actually carries on business — a Lagos State employer cannot enforce a nationwide restriction without operations in other states. The scope must be consistent with the Labour Act (Cap L1, LFN 2004) and the employer's actual business footprint.
Duration: The specific post-termination period for which the restriction applies. The NICN and the Court of Appeal have generally treated 6 to 24 months as potentially reasonable for post-employment non-competes, based on the seniority of the employee and sensitivity of information. Periods exceeding three years in employment contexts are vulnerable to challenge under the restraint of trade doctrine. In sale-of-business contexts, the Court of Appeal has upheld up to five years where the seller received full consideration for the goodwill.
Protected Interests: An express statement of the legitimate business interests being protected — trade secrets under the common law of confidence, confidential client lists developed at the employer's expense, proprietary software protected by the Copyright Act (Cap C28, LFN 2004), or patented processes under the Patents and Designs Act (Cap P2, LFN 2004). Nigerian courts require the employer to articulate the protectable interest; a bare non-compete without identified interests is more vulnerable to challenge.
Consideration: Adequate consideration supporting the non-compete. For a non-compete in an employment contract at hiring, the employment itself is sufficient consideration under Nigerian contract law. For a non-compete added after employment commences, additional consideration — a salary increase, a specific bonus payment, or enhanced benefits — is required. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) assesses withholding tax on any cash consideration under the Companies Income Tax Act (Cap C21, LFN 2004).
Remedies, Data Protection, and Governing Law: Express provision that breach entitles the employer to an interlocutory injunction from the NICN, State High Court, or Federal High Court, in addition to damages. The Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA 2023) administered by the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) applies to any personal data of the employee processed under the agreement — including monitoring obligations. Stamp duty under the Stamp Duties Act (Cap S8, LFN 2004) is assessed by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) on the agreement where a corporate party is involved. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point — employers should engage a Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)-enrolled employment lawyer to tailor restrictions to the specific employment context and current NICN jurisprudence.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria) (Nigeria) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-nigeria
"Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria) (Nigeria)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-nigeria.
@misc{formslegal-non-compete-agreement-nigeria,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Non-Compete Agreement (Nigeria) (Nigeria)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/employment/contracts/non-compete-agreement-nigeria}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Common law doctrine of restraint of trade}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Non-compete agreements are enforceable in Nigeria if they satisfy the restraint of trade doctrine as applied by Nigerian courts. The Supreme Court of Nigeria and the Court of Appeal have confirmed that a restraint of trade is enforceable if: (a) the party imposing it has a legitimate protectable interest such as trade secrets or confidential client relationships; (b) the geographical scope, duration, and activities restricted are no wider than reasonably necessary to protect that interest; and (c) the restraint does not injure public policy. Nigerian courts draw from English common law principles — including the House of Lords decision in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt [1894] AC 535 — as part of received law. Post-employment non-competes of 6 to 12 months for senior employees in specialist roles are generally treated as reasonable; broader restrictions must be supported by strong evidence of the employer's protectable interest. An overly broad non-compete will be struck down in its entirety or "blue-pencilled" (judicially narrowed) by Nigerian courts.
Nigerian courts have not established a fixed maximum duration for non-compete agreements, but decisions from the Court of Appeal and Federal High Court suggest that 6 to 24 months is typically treated as a reasonable post-employment restriction for most categories of employees. For senior executives with access to highly sensitive strategic information — such as a CEO, CFO, or Chief Technology Officer — a period of up to 24 months may be upheld if the employer demonstrates genuine protectable interests. For junior or mid-level employees, courts are more likely to view any restriction beyond 6 to 12 months as excessive. In sale-of-business contexts, periods of 2 to 5 years are more readily accepted, reflecting the fact that the seller has received full consideration for the goodwill being protected. The duration must be linked to the actual risk period during which the confidential information or client relationships remain commercially valuable; a non-compete that outlasts the useful life of the information is unreasonable.
Yes. Nigerian courts have adopted the "blue pencil" doctrine — inherited from English common law — under which a court may strike out the unreasonable portion of a non-compete clause while preserving the remainder, provided the severable portion makes grammatical and legal sense standing alone. The Court of Appeal in Nigeria has applied severance to non-compete clauses where, for example, the geographical scope exceeded reasonable bounds but the temporal restriction was reasonable. However, Nigerian courts will not rewrite or reconstruct a non-compete clause; they can only delete unreasonable words if what remains is coherent. If the entire clause is so unreasonable that severance is impossible, the court will strike it out in full. Employers drafting non-compete clauses in Nigeria are advised to include separate clauses with graduated restrictions — different clauses for different regions, durations, or activities — to increase the likelihood that at least some protection survives judicial scrutiny.
An employer whose former employee or contractor breaches a valid non-compete agreement in Nigeria may seek the following remedies from the High Court or Federal High Court. First, an interlocutory or interim injunction restraining the defendant from continuing the competing activity pending trial — this is often the most important remedy because it prevents ongoing harm while the litigation is resolved. The court applies the American Cyanamid principles (as received by Nigerian courts) in deciding whether to grant an injunction, considering whether there is a serious question to be tried and where the balance of convenience lies. Second, damages for losses suffered as a result of the breach, including lost profits, cost of client replacement, and value of diverted business opportunities. Third, an account of profits if the breach resulted in the defendant making profits from the confidential information or client relationships taken from the employer. Injunctions are available from the Federal High Court for nationwide breaches and from State High Courts for state-level breaches.
A non-compete agreement in Nigeria does not need to be in writing to be enforceable under Nigerian common law principles — oral agreements are theoretically binding if the other elements of a valid contract are present. However, in practice, Nigerian courts will require clear evidence of the terms of any oral non-compete, making a written agreement strongly advisable. The Statute of Frauds (as received in southern Nigeria) does not specifically require restraint of trade agreements to be in writing, but the difficulty of proving oral restraints before Nigerian courts makes a written, signed agreement essential for enforcement. The non-compete should be embedded in or attached to the employment contract or service agreement and signed by both parties, with the employee receiving a copy. Where a non-compete is added after employment has begun, the agreement must be supported by fresh consideration and executed as a standalone document to avoid arguments that the employee had no notice of the restriction at the time of hiring.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Non-Disclosure Agreement (Nigeria)
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) for Nigeria protecting confidential information shared between parties in a business relationship. Governed by Nigerian contract law and enforceable before the Federal High Court or State High Courts. Covers unilateral and mutual NDA structures, permitted disclosures, remedies for breach, and exceptions for information already in the public domain.
Non-Solicitation Agreement (Nigeria)
A Non-Solicitation Agreement for Nigeria that prevents a departing employee or contractor from soliciting the employer's clients, customers, or staff after the termination of employment or service. Enforceable under Nigerian restraint of trade law where the restrictions are reasonable in scope and duration.
Consulting Agreement — Nigeria
A professional consulting agreement for Nigeria governing the engagement of an independent consultant. Covers scope of services, fees, intellectual property ownership, confidentiality, termination, and tax treatment under the Personal Income Tax Act and Companies Income Tax Act.