Affidavit of Service (Malaysia)
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Order 65, Rules of Court 2012
Case No.: [Case Reference]
I, [Server Name] (NRIC: [Server NRIC]), [Server Occupation], of [Server Address], DO HEREBY SWEAR / AFFIRM as follows:
SERVICE OF PROCESS
1. On [Service Date] at [Service Time], I served the [Document Served] on [Person Served] at [Service Address].
2. Method of Service: [Service Method]
3. Circumstances of Service: [Service Circumstances]
JURAT
Sworn / Affirmed at Kuala Lumpur on [Affidavit Date]
Signature of Deponent: [Server Name]
Before me:
(Commissioner for Oaths — seal and signature)
Process Server / Deponent
________________
Signature
Commissioner for Oaths
________________
Signature
What Is a Affidavit of Service (Malaysia)?
An Affidavit of Service in Malaysia records sworn statements of fact that can be relied on before a court or authority.
Proof of service is a critical procedural requirement in Malaysian civil litigation because the court cannot proceed against a defendant who has not been given proper notice of the proceedings. Order 13 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012, which governs judgment in default of appearance, expressly requires that the plaintiff first prove service of the writ before the court will enter default judgment. Without a properly filed Affidavit of Service, a default judgment may be set aside by the court as irregular under Order 19 Rule 9 of the Rules of Court 2012, at the defendant's application.
Service of process in Malaysian civil proceedings is primarily effected by personal service or by substituted service authorised by the court. Personal service of a writ of summons under Order 10 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 is effected by leaving a copy of the writ with the defendant personally. For corporate defendants, service on a company under Order 65 Rule 2 is effected by leaving the document with an officer of the company or at the company's registered office. Where personal service cannot be effected despite reasonable attempts, a party may apply to the court for an order for substituted service under Order 62 Rule 5 — for example, by advertisement in a national newspaper, by posting at the defendant's last known address, by WhatsApp message, or by email.
The mode of service and the date and time of service recorded in the Affidavit of Service are critical for computing time deadlines — including the time allowed for the defendant to enter appearance (14 days from service for defendants within Malaysia under Order 12 Rule 4), and the date from which the limitation period for further steps is calculated. The process server who personally served the document must be the deponent of the Affidavit of Service.
The legal framework governing the Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) in Malaysia draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Malaysian law, the Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) governs contractual obligations. The Companies Act 2016 (Act 777) regulates corporate entities through the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM). The Employment Act 1955 (Act 265) and the Department of Labour govern employment matters. The Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Act 709) and the Personal Data Protection Department protect personal data. The Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (LHDN) administers tax obligations. The Industrial Court adjudicates employment disputes under the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177). Parties executing a Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) in Malaysia should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Affidavit of Service (Malaysia)?
An Affidavit of Service is required in Malaysia in all court proceedings where proof of service of a court document must be established before the court will take a further step.
An Affidavit of Service is needed after a writ of summons has been served on the defendant and the plaintiff wishes to apply for judgment in default of appearance under Order 13 of the Rules of Court 2012. The court requires proof that the writ was properly served before entering default judgment — an Affidavit of Service deposed by the process server is the standard method of proof.
An Affidavit of Service is required after substituted service has been carried out pursuant to a court order under Order 62 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012. The affidavit must confirm that the specific mode of substituted service ordered by the court (e.g., advertisement in a specified newspaper, posting at the defendant's address, or service by email or WhatsApp) was carried out on the specified date.
An Affidavit of Service is needed when a plaintiff applies for judgment in default of defence under Order 19 of the Rules of Court 2012, where the defendant entered appearance but has failed to file a defence within the prescribed time. The affidavit verifies that the writ of summons, statement of claim, and any notices of default of defence were properly served on the defendant.
An Affidavit of Service is required in applications to commit a party for contempt of court under Order 52 of the Rules of Court 2012 — for example, where a defendant has breached an injunction order. The affidavit must prove that the injunction order was personally served on the defendant before the breach occurred, as an injunction can only be enforced against a person with notice of its terms.
An Affidavit of Service is needed when serving statutory notices in corporate insolvency proceedings — such as the 21-day statutory demand under Section 466 of the Companies Act 2016 which is a prerequisite to presenting a winding-up petition. The affidavit of service of the statutory demand is essential evidence in the winding-up proceedings.
What to Include in Your Affidavit of Service (Malaysia)
A valid Affidavit of Service in Malaysia under the Rules of Court 2012 must contain the following essential elements.
Deponent Identity: The full name, occupation, and address of the process server or the person who effected service. The deponent must have personal knowledge of the service — they must have been present at the time of service. An administrative officer or solicitor who did not personally serve the document cannot depose to an Affidavit of Service unless they are confirming substituted service that they arranged.
Document Served: A precise identification of the document that was served — including the name of the court, the case number, the title of the proceedings (parties' names), and the nature of the document (e.g., Writ of Summons, Originating Summons, Notice of Application, Court Order, Statutory Demand). A copy of the document served must be exhibited as a numbered exhibit to the affidavit.
Recipient Details: The full name of the person on whom the document was served, and — for personal service — a physical description of the person if they did not identify themselves (to establish that service was effected on a human being at the address and not left with an unknown person).
Date, Time, and Place of Service: The exact date (in DD/MM/YYYY format), time (e.g., 2:45 p.m.), and physical address or location where service was effected. These details are essential for computing the time allowed for the defendant to respond and for determining whether service was effected before any relevant deadline.
Manner of Service: A description of how service was effected — for personal service, a statement that the document was delivered personally to the named defendant (or to a named officer at the company's registered office for corporate service); for substituted service, a description of the specific mode authorised by the court order and confirmation that it was carried out exactly as ordered.
Attempts Before Substituted Service: If substituted service was ordered, the affidavit should record the prior attempts at personal service — dates, times, and the outcomes of those attempts — demonstrating that personal service could not be effected despite diligent effort, which is the prerequisite for a court to order substituted service under Order 62 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012.
Additional compliance elements for a Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) used in Malaysia include: Under Malaysian law, the Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) governs contractual obligations. The Companies Act 2016 (Act 777) regulates corporate entities through the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM). The Employment Act 1955 (Act 265) and the Department of Labour govern employment matters. The Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Act 709) and the Personal Data Protection Department protect personal data. The Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (LHDN) administers tax obligations. The Industrial Court adjudicates employment disputes under the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177). Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Malaysia-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) (Malaysia) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/malaysia/personal/legal-declarations/affidavit-of-service-malaysia
"Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) (Malaysia)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/malaysia/personal/legal-declarations/affidavit-of-service-malaysia.
@misc{formslegal-affidavit-of-service-malaysia,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) (Malaysia)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/malaysia/personal/legal-declarations/affidavit-of-service-malaysia}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136)}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
The proper method of serving a Writ of Summons on an individual defendant in Malaysia is personal service under Order 10 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012. Personal service is effected by leaving a copy of the writ with the defendant personally — meaning the process server physically hands the document to the defendant. If the defendant refuses to accept the document, the process server may leave it in the defendant's presence and note this in the Affidavit of Service. Personal service is preferred because it provides the strongest evidence of service and is the least vulnerable to challenge. If personal service cannot be effected despite reasonable attempts — for example, if the defendant cannot be located at their known address — the plaintiff may apply to the court under Order 62 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012 for an order for substituted service. Common modes of substituted service ordered by Malaysian courts include: posting the writ at the defendant's last known address, advertisement in a Bahasa Malaysia national daily newspaper (such as Utusan Malaysia or Berita Harian), and increasingly, service by WhatsApp message or email, which Malaysian courts have accepted in recent years.
Service of a Writ of Summons on a company registered with SSM in Malaysia is governed by Order 65 Rule 2 of the Rules of Court 2012 and Section 249 of the Companies Act 2016. A document may be served on a company by: (1) leaving a copy at or sending it by registered post to the company's registered address as maintained with SSM; or (2) personally serving a copy on a director, manager, or company secretary of the company. Section 249 of the Companies Act 2016 provides that a document may be given to a company by leaving it at, or sending it by post to, the registered office of the company. For the Affidavit of Service, the deponent must state that the writ was left at the company's registered address as shown in the SSM records — it is prudent to conduct an SSM company search before service to confirm the current registered address. Service by registered post (AR registered post) is effective on the day it would have been delivered in the ordinary course of post — typically 2 business days from posting. The affidavit should exhibit the AR registered post receipt and the returned AR card bearing the recipient's signature.
Malaysian courts have increasingly accepted WhatsApp messages and emails as valid modes of substituted service of court documents, subject to a court order authorising this mode of service under Order 62 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012. To obtain an order for substituted service by WhatsApp or email, the plaintiff must apply to the court by summons supported by an affidavit showing: (1) that personal service has been attempted without success on at least two or three occasions; (2) that the defendant uses the WhatsApp number or email address in question and it belongs to the defendant (evidenced by prior communication with the defendant through that channel); and (3) that substituted service by that electronic means is likely to bring the document to the defendant's attention. If the court grants the order, service by the specified WhatsApp or email is deemed good service on the date specified. The Affidavit of Service must then exhibit a screenshot of the WhatsApp message showing delivery or read receipt, or a screen capture of the email showing the sent message and, if available, a delivery or read notification. High Court of Malaya decisions including those in 2020–2022 have endorsed this approach for defendants who are active on WhatsApp but evade personal service.
If service of court process is found to be defective in Malaysian civil proceedings, the consequences depend on the severity of the defect and whether the defendant has suffered prejudice. Where a writ was not properly served and judgment in default was entered, the defendant may apply to set aside the default judgment as irregular under Order 19 Rule 9 of the Rules of Court 2012 on the basis that they had no proper notice of the proceedings. An irregular default judgment obtained without due proof of service may be set aside ex debito justitiae (as of right) by the court, without the defendant needing to show a defence on the merits. Where there is a procedural irregularity in service that is not fundamental — for example, the Affidavit of Service contains a minor error in the time of service but service was actually effected — the court may cure the irregularity under Order 2 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012, which gives the court a wide discretion to treat as valid steps that do not comply strictly with the Rules if no injustice results. A deliberate false Affidavit of Service is perjury under Section 193 of the Penal Code and contempt of court under Order 52 of the Rules of Court 2012.
A Affidavit of Service (Malaysia) does not legally require a lawyer in Malaysia, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified Malaysia lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Federal Court of Malaysia has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
General Affidavit (Malaysia)
A General Affidavit (Afidavit Am) for use in Malaysian court proceedings and legal applications under the Rules of Court 2012 and the Evidence Act 1950. Covers deponent particulars, sworn statements of fact, exhibit references, and Commissioner for Oaths attestation requirements for use before the High Court, Sessions Court, and Magistrates' Court of Malaysia.
Writ of Summons (Malaysia)
A Writ of Summons (Writ Saman) for commencing civil proceedings in the High Court of Malaya under Order 5 of the Rules of Court 2012. Used to initiate litigation for breach of contract, debt recovery, tort claims, and other civil disputes. Covers cause title, indorsement of claim, parties' particulars, and filing requirements under the Malaysian court e-filing system.
Judgment in Default (Malaysia)
An application and supporting affidavit for Judgment in Default (Penghakiman Ingkar) in the High Court of Malaya under Order 13 and Order 19 of the Rules of Court 2012. Used when a defendant fails to enter appearance or file a defence after being served with a Writ of Summons. Covers proof of service, debt verification, and enforcement options in Malaysian courts.