Master Service Agreement (India)
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT
Indian Contract Act 1872 | Copyright Act 1957 | CGST Act 2017 | Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
This Master Service Agreement ("MSA" or "Agreement") is entered into on [Agreement Date] between:
SERVICE PROVIDER: [Provider Name] (PAN: [Provider PAN]), GSTIN: [Provider GSTIN], registered at [Provider Address] ("Provider"); and
CUSTOMER: [Customer Name] (PAN: [Customer PAN]), GSTIN: [Customer GSTIN], registered at [Customer Address] ("Customer").
1. SCOPE AND SOW FRAMEWORK
1.1 This MSA governs the provision of services by the Provider to the Customer. Specific projects and engagements shall be defined in individual Statements of Work ("SOWs") executed under this MSA. Each SOW shall specify the scope, deliverables, milestones, fees, and project-specific terms.
1.2 In case of conflict between this MSA and a SOW, the SOW terms shall prevail for that engagement unless the MSA term is expressly stated to be non-waivable.
1.3 This MSA has an initial term of [MSA Term] commencing on [Agreement Date], with automatic renewal unless either party provides 90 days' written notice of non-renewal before the expiry of the then-current term.
2. FEES, GST, AND TDS
2.1 Fees for each engagement shall be specified in the applicable SOW, stated exclusive of GST. GST at the applicable rate under the CGST Act 2017 shall be charged on each invoice. Both parties shall provide their GSTIN for tax invoice purposes.
2.2 Payment is due within [Payment Terms] of receipt of a valid GST tax invoice. Late payments attract interest at 18% per annum from the due date.
2.3 TDS: The Customer shall deduct TDS at the applicable rate under Section 194J or 194C of the Income Tax Act 1961 as applicable, deposit with the Income Tax Department, and issue Form 16A to the Provider.
3. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
3.1 IP ownership of deliverables: [IP Ownership].
3.2 'Background IP' means IP owned by a party before the MSA or developed independently without reference to the other party's Confidential Information. Each party retains its Background IP. Where Background IP is incorporated in deliverables, the owning party grants a non-exclusive licence for the other party to use the Background IP as embedded in the deliverables.
3.3 The Customer retains all IP in and ownership of Customer materials, data, and information provided to the Provider.
3.4 Open-source: The Provider shall disclose all open-source components used in deliverables and their applicable licences. The Provider shall not incorporate open-source components with copyleft licences that impose reciprocal obligations on the Customer's proprietary code without the Customer's prior written consent.
4. LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY
4.1 Each party's total aggregate liability for all claims arising from this MSA shall not exceed [Liability Cap]. Neither party shall be liable for indirect, consequential, special, incidental, or punitive damages including loss of profits, revenue, data, or business, regardless of foreseeability.
4.2 The Provider shall indemnify the Customer against third-party IP infringement claims relating to deliverables (used within the agreed scope). The Customer shall indemnify the Provider against claims arising from the Customer's breach of applicable law or misuse of deliverables.
4.3 Exclusions from liability cap: death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, and each party's indemnity obligations are not subject to the liability cap.
5. CONFIDENTIALITY AND TERMINATION
5.1 Each party shall keep the other's Confidential Information confidential during the MSA term and for 3 years after termination. Neither party shall use the other's Confidential Information for any purpose other than fulfilling obligations under this MSA.
5.2 Either party may terminate this MSA for material breach upon 30 days' written notice if the breach is not cured within the notice period. Either party may terminate without cause on 90 days' written notice.
5.3 Termination of the MSA does not automatically terminate active SOWs, which shall continue until completion or expiry unless separately terminated.
6. GOVERNING LAW AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
6.1 This MSA is governed by the laws of India and the State of [Governing State].
6.2 Disputes shall be resolved by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, seated at [Governing State], before a sole arbitrator appointed by mutual agreement. Language of arbitration: English.
Service Provider (Authorised Signatory)
________________
Signature
Customer (Authorised Signatory)
________________
Signature
What Is a Master Service Agreement (India)?
A Master Service Agreement in India engages an independent contractor to supply services and records the scope of work, fees, timetable and ownership of any deliverables.
The Indian Contract Act 1872 (Sections 1–75) provides the foundational law for commercial contracts in India. A valid MSA requires offer and acceptance (Section 2(a) and 2(b)), lawful consideration (Section 2(d)), free consent (Section 14 — freedom from coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, and mistake), parties competent to contract (Section 11 — majority, sound mind, not disqualified by law), and a lawful object (Section 23). The MSA as a framework agreement itself satisfies these requirements; each SOW executed under it constitutes a separate contract with its own specific consideration (the agreed fees).
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 treats IT services and professional services as taxable services at 18% GST (SAC code 998314 for IT design and development, 998315 for IT support, 998313 for software consulting). Every invoice under an MSA must comply with GST invoice rules — GSTIN of both parties, SAC code, GST amount, reverse charge applicability where applicable, and e-invoicing requirements for turnovers above ₹5 crore.
Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under the Income Tax Act 1961 applies to payments under Indian MSAs. Section 194J requires TDS at 10% on fees for professional services and technical services above ₹30,000 per transaction. Payments to IT service providers for software development, consulting, and outsourced services are typically classified as 'technical services' under Section 194J (or the reduced rate of 2% for certain technical services). Non-deduction of TDS results in disallowance of the expense deduction for the customer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.
Dispute resolution in Indian MSAs typically follows a two-tier structure: first, internal escalation through project steering committees and senior management; second, arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Arbitration Act strengthened India's arbitration framework by introducing timelines (12 months for domestic arbitration, extendable to 18 months with leave), limiting court intervention, and establishing the Arbitration Council of India. Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad are the primary seats of arbitration for technology MSAs in India, with the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) and Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) as recognised institutional arbitration bodies.
When Do You Need a Master Service Agreement (India)?
A Master Service Agreement is required whenever a service provider and customer anticipate entering into multiple successive or concurrent service engagements over a period of time, and wish to establish a single set of legal terms that governs all such engagements without renegotiating the full agreement for each project.
Information technology companies — Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro, HCL Technologies, Tech Mahindra, and thousands of mid-size and startup IT firms — execute MSAs with corporate customers in India and globally as the standard commercial framework for application development, digital transformation, cloud migration, cybersecurity, and managed services engagements. The MSA is signed once, covering all standard legal terms, while individual SOWs define the scope, team, milestones, and fees for each distinct project.
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) providers in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai, and Mumbai serving financial services, healthcare, and insurance companies in the US, UK, and Australia structure their relationships through MSAs with accompanying data processing schedules that address Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act 2023 obligations, GDPR requirements for EU-connected data, and HIPAA obligations for US healthcare data.
Management consulting firms — McKinsey, Bain, BCG, Deloitte, KPMG, EY, and PwC — executing multi-year advisory, strategy, and implementation engagements with Indian corporates and government entities use MSAs to establish consistent engagement terms across concurrent and successive consulting SOWs. Indian professional services regulations (ICAI guidelines for Chartered Accountants, ICSI guidelines for Company Secretaries) impose independence and conflict of interest obligations that the MSA framework must accommodate.
Startups and SaaS companies providing software-as-a-service platforms to enterprise customers in India require MSAs to cover subscription services, professional services for implementation and customisation, and support services — all under a single legal framework. The DPDP Act 2023 requires data processors (service providers) to process personal data only as instructed by the data fiduciary (customer), making the MSA's data processing schedule a regulatory compliance document as well as a commercial one.
Staffing companies and HR technology platforms providing contract workforce solutions — under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 (CLRA Act) and the Code on Wages 2019 — to manufacturing companies, retail chains, and IT companies use MSAs to govern the workforce deployment relationship, with individual deployment orders replacing SOWs.
What to Include in Your Master Service Agreement (India)
A Master Service Agreement for India under the Indian Contract Act 1872 must contain the following provisions to be legally sound, commercially protective, and compliant with Indian tax and data protection law.
The parties and recitals section identifies the service provider and customer with full legal names, registered office addresses, Corporate Identification Numbers (CINs) or LLP Identification Numbers (LLPINs) for companies and LLPs, GST registration numbers (GSTINs), and PAN. The recitals describe the nature of the services to be provided and the parties' intention to enter into an ongoing commercial relationship through the MSA-SOW framework.
The scope and SOW framework clause establishes that the specific services, deliverables, timelines, milestones, personnel, and fees for each engagement are set out in individual Statements of Work executed by both parties and incorporated into the MSA by reference. The clause specifies the change control procedure — how changes to an approved SOW are requested, evaluated, and authorised — to prevent scope creep and fee disputes. The conflict resolution hierarchy (SOW terms prevail over MSA terms for commercial matters; MSA terms prevail for legal matters such as IP, liability, and confidentiality) must be clearly stated.
The fees, invoicing, and payment clause specifies the currency of payment (Indian Rupees or USD for export transactions), invoicing cycle (monthly, milestone-based, or time-and-materials), payment terms (30 days from invoice date is standard), and late payment interest (typically at the State Bank of India base rate plus 2%). Every invoice must comply with GST invoice requirements under the CGST Rules 2017 — including GSTIN, HSN/SAC code, and GST at 18%. The TDS deduction mechanism under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act (10% on professional and technical services) must be addressed — the customer deducts TDS, remits to the Income Tax Department, and provides Form 16A to the service provider each quarter.
The intellectual property ownership clause addresses Background IP (each party retains its pre-existing IP), Foreground IP (deliverables — assigned to the customer upon full payment, with a written copyright assignment under Section 19 of the Copyright Act 1957), and Licence Grant (the service provider receives a licence to use customer Background IP solely to perform the services). Open-source component disclosure obligations and compliance with open-source licences (Apache, MIT, GPL, etc.) must be addressed to prevent copyleft infection of customer proprietary code.
The confidentiality clause binds both parties to protect the other's confidential information — trade secrets, technical specifications, business plans, customer data, financial information — using the same standard of care as they use for their own confidential information (at least reasonable care). Exceptions for publicly known information, independently developed information, and legally compelled disclosure are standard. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 imposes obligations on data processors (service providers) that must be addressed in a separate data processing addendum or within the confidentiality clause.
The liability cap and exclusions clause sets an aggregate liability cap (commonly 3–12 months' fees under the applicable SOW) and excludes liability for indirect, consequential, or punitive damages. Carve-outs from the cap for death/personal injury, wilful misconduct, IP infringement indemnity, and data breach liability must be specified.
The term and termination clause states the MSA duration (typically 3–5 years with automatic renewal), termination for material breach (30 days' notice to cure), termination for insolvency or corporate dissolution, and termination for convenience (90 days' notice with fee payment for work completed). The survival clause identifies provisions that survive termination — confidentiality, IP ownership, indemnity, liability cap.
The dispute resolution clause provides for escalation to senior management followed by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 — specifying the seat (Mumbai, Delhi, or Bengaluru), the institutional rules (MCIA, DIAC, or ad hoc), and the number of arbitrators (sole arbitrator for disputes below ₹1 crore, three arbitrators for larger disputes). Governing law is Indian law. The forms-legal.com Master Service Agreement (India) template covers the mandatory elements under Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Sources & Citations
Statutory citations link to official government sources.
- HIPAAUS – Cornell LII
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Master Service Agreement (India) (India) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/india/business/contracts/master-service-agreement-india
"Master Service Agreement (India) (India)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/india/business/contracts/master-service-agreement-india.
@misc{formslegal-master-service-agreement-india,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Master Service Agreement (India) (India)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/india/business/contracts/master-service-agreement-india}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Indian Contract Act, 1872}
}Also available for these jurisdictions:
Frequently Asked Questions
A Master Service Agreement (MSA) is a framework contract that establishes the overarching legal terms and conditions governing an ongoing commercial relationship between a service provider and a customer. Unlike a standard service agreement (which covers a single, defined engagement with a fixed scope and timeline), an MSA is designed to govern multiple separate projects or service engagements over an extended period, each executed through separate Statements of Work (SOWs) or Project Orders. The MSA-SOW structure is particularly prevalent in India's IT and professional services industry — accounting for a large proportion of India's significant IT export revenue (approximately $245 billion in FY 2023-24). The structure works as follows: the MSA sets out all non-commercial terms (IP ownership, confidentiality, indemnity, liability, governing law, dispute resolution) that apply across all projects, while each SOW or Project Order defines the specific deliverables, timelines, milestones, fees, and project-specific terms for a particular engagement. Key advantages of the MSA-SOW structure:
Efficiency: Once the MSA is negotiated and signed (often after extensive legal review), individual SOWs can be executed quickly without re-negotiating all commercial terms. This is particularly valuable for large IT outsourcing relationships where dozens of projects may be active simultaneously. Consistency: The MSA ensures consistent legal terms across all projects, reducing the risk of conflicting provisions in different project-specific agreements.
Intellectual property ownership is typically the most negotiated aspect of Indian MSAs, particularly in IT services where the delivered software, code, and systems may be highly valuable. The Copyright Act 1957 and the Patents Act 1970 provide the legal framework. Default position under the Copyright Act 1957: Under Section 17, the author is the first owner of copyright. However, where a work is created by an employee in the course of their employment, the employer owns the copyright (Section 17(b)). For independent contractors (service providers), this employee-work rule does NOT apply — the contractor owns the copyright in deliverables unless there is a written assignment. Work-for-hire vs. assignment: Unlike US copyright law, Indian copyright law does not have a specific 'work-for-hire' category for contractors. To transfer copyright in deliverables from the service provider to the customer, the MSA must include a written copyright assignment under Section 19 of the Copyright Act. The assignment must be in writing, signed by the assignor, and specify the works, territory, and duration. Pre-existing IP: The MSA must carefully distinguish between: (a) 'Background IP' — the service provider's pre-existing tools, frameworks, methodologies, code libraries, and know-how that existed before the engagement or were developed independently; and (b) 'Foreground IP' — the deliverables specifically created for the customer under the SOWs.
Liability and indemnity provisions in Indian MSAs require careful drafting to balance protection against legitimate commercial risks while complying with Indian law principles. Liability cap: The MSA should include an aggregate liability cap limiting each party's total liability for all claims arising from or related to the MSA and all SOWs during a specified period (typically the 12 months preceding the claim). The cap is commonly set at the total fees paid or payable under the relevant SOW, or the total fees paid in the preceding 12 months under all SOWs. Some MSAs include a higher cap for specific high-risk obligations (data breach, IP infringement) and a lower cap for general service failures. Exclusion of consequential damages: The MSA should explicitly exclude liability for indirect, consequential, special, incidental, or punitive damages, and specifically loss of profits, loss of business, loss of revenue, loss of data, and loss of goodwill. Indian courts generally respect such exclusion clauses in commercial contracts between sophisticated parties, though exclusions must not be unconscionable or unreasonable. Mutual indemnity structure: Each party should indemnify the other for: (a) death or personal injury caused by negligence; (b) fraud or wilful misconduct; and (c) specific indemnified claims.
Stamp duty on Master Service Agreements in India is an important practical consideration, particularly for high-value IT outsourcing and professional services engagements. Stamp duty framework: Stamp duty on agreements is governed by the Indian Stamp Act 1899 and the respective state stamp acts. As stamp duty is a state subject (Schedule VII, List II of the Indian Constitution), rates vary significantly across states. The MSA is typically executed in the state where the service provider or customer has its principal place of business, and the stamp duty of that state applies. Characterisation of an MSA: An MSA is typically characterised as a 'Service Agreement' or 'Agreement' under the applicable state stamp schedule. Common stamp duty rates for service agreements include:
Maharashtra: ₹500 for agreements up to ₹10 lakh in value; ad valorem rates (typically 0.1%) for higher values, subject to the Maharashtra Stamp Act 1958 schedule. Karnataka: ₹500 for ordinary agreements under the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957. Delhi: ₹100 to ₹500 for agreements under the Indian Stamp Act (Delhi area). Tamil Nadu: ₹300 for agreements under the Tamil Nadu Stamp Act. E-stamping: Most states now offer e-stamping through the Stock Holding Corporation of India Limited (SHCIL) or state-specific portals. E-stamped agreements are digitally verified and accepted by courts as admissible evidence. Registration: MSAs are generally not required to be registered under the Registration Act 1908.
A Master Service Agreement (India) does not legally require a lawyer in India, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified India lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of India has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Registrar of Companies (ROC) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Service Agreement (India)
A comprehensive service agreement under the Indian Contract Act 1872, GST Act 2017, and Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. Covers scope of services, GST-inclusive fees, SLA, confidentiality, IP ownership, liability cap, force majeure, and MSME-friendly payment terms.
Service Level Agreement (India)
A Service Level Agreement (SLA) for India, governed by the Indian Contract Act 1872 and the IT Act 2000. Defines service metrics, uptime targets, response and resolution times, performance measurement methodology, service credits for SLA breaches, escalation matrix, maintenance windows, and reporting obligations. Suitable as a standalone SLA or schedule to a Master Service Agreement or SaaS Agreement for IT services, managed services, and technology outsourcing in India.
Consulting Agreement (India)
A professional Consulting Agreement for India, governed by the Indian Contract Act 1872 and GST Act 2017. Establishes the consultant's scope of work, fees, TDS obligations, IP ownership, confidentiality, and termination rights. Suitable for independent consultants and advisory firms.
Independent Contractor Agreement (India)
A comprehensive independent contractor agreement for India, governed by the Indian Contract Act 1872, Income Tax Act (Section 194C — TDS on contractor payments), and GST Act 2017. Clearly establishes the contractor's independent status to avoid deemed-employee risk. Includes TDS deduction, GST invoicing, IP assignment, confidentiality, indemnification, and arbitration clauses.