Summons Application (Singapore)
IN THE [Court Name]
SUIT NO: [Suit Number]
SUMMONS NO: [Summons Number]
BETWEEN
[Plaintiff Name]
Plaintiff
AND
[Defendant Name]
Defendant
SUMMONS
Let all parties concerned attend before the Court on a date and time to be fixed for the hearing of an application by the [Applicant Party] for the following orders:
[Orders Sought]
GROUNDS
[Grounds Of Application]
SUPPORTING DOCUMENT
This application is supported by: [Supporting Document].
STATEMENT OF TRUTH
I believe that the facts stated in this application are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against any person who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Filed on: [Filing Date]
Solicitors for the [Applicant Party]: [Solicitor Name]
Address: [Solicitor Address]
Ref: [Solicitor Ref]
Applicant / Applicant's Solicitor
________________
Signature
What Is a Summons Application (Singapore)?
A Summons Application in Singapore sets out the particulars an applicant must provide to obtain the approval concerned.
Under the ROC 2021, administered by the Supreme Court of Singapore and the State Courts, a summons application is governed by Order 11 (Applications and Proceedings in Chambers). The applicant files the summons setting out the orders sought, the grounds for the application, and the supporting evidence (typically by way of affidavit). The summons is served on all parties to the proceedings, and the application is heard by a Judge or Registrar in chambers unless the court directs an open court hearing.
Common interlocutory applications made by summons in Singapore include: applications for injunctive relief (Mareva injunctions to freeze assets under the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969, Cap. 322; Anton Piller orders for search and seizure); applications for discovery and inspection of documents under Order 11 Rule 1; applications to strike out pleadings under Order 9 Rule 16; applications for summary judgment under Order 9 Rule 17; applications to amend pleadings; applications for extension or abridgement of time; and applications for security for costs under Order 11 Rule 1.
The Singapore courts have embraced electronic filing through the Electronic Filing System (EFS) and its successor, the Integrated Electronic Litigation System (iELS). All summons applications in the Supreme Court and State Courts must be filed electronically through the approved system. The Singapore Academy of Law (SAL) administers the electronic filing infrastructure, and filing fees are prescribed by the Rules of Court (Fees) Rules.
The Practice Directions issued by the Supreme Court of Singapore and the State Courts supplement the ROC 2021 and provide detailed guidance on the filing, service, and hearing of summons applications, including page limits for written submissions, timelines for filing and exchange of affidavits, and the conduct of hearings by video conference through the court's designated platform. The Rules of Court 2021 (S 914/2021) and the Practice Directions of the Supreme Court of Singapore govern the core requirements for this type of document.
When Do You Need a Summons Application (Singapore)?
A Summons Application is needed whenever a party to existing civil proceedings in Singapore requires the court to grant interlocutory relief, procedural directions, or interim orders during the course of the litigation.
Parties seeking injunctive relief must file a summons application. A plaintiff who fears that the defendant will dissipate assets before judgment can apply by summons for a Mareva (freezing) injunction under the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969 (Cap. 322). A plaintiff who suspects that the defendant will destroy evidence can apply for an Anton Piller (search) order. The Singapore High Court requires the applicant to file a supporting affidavit setting out the grounds for the injunction, and urgent applications may be heard ex parte (without notice to the other party) with the applicant's counsel attending before the Duty Judge.
Parties requiring discovery of documents must file a summons for specific discovery or general discovery under Order 11 Rule 1 of the ROC 2021. Discovery applications are common in commercial litigation, intellectual property disputes (heard by the Intellectual Property Division of the High Court), and employment disputes where the employee alleges wrongful dismissal and seeks disclosure of internal HR records.
Defendants seeking to strike out a claim or counterclaim file a summons for striking out under Order 9 Rule 16 of the ROC 2021, on grounds that the pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action, is frivolous or vexatious, or is an abuse of process of the court.
Plaintiffs with strong claims may file a summons for summary judgment under Order 9 Rule 17, seeking judgment without a full trial on the basis that the defendant has no defence or no triable issue. Summary judgment applications are widely used in debt recovery proceedings, bills of exchange claims under the Bills of Exchange Act (Cap. 23), and straightforward breach of contract claims.
Parties needing to amend their pleadings — to add new causes of action, correct errors, or respond to newly discovered facts — must file a summons for leave to amend under Order 9 Rule 19. The court will consider whether the amendment is necessary for the fair determination of the dispute and whether it causes prejudice to the other party that cannot be compensated by costs.
Applications for extension of time are made by summons where a party has missed a procedural deadline prescribed by the ROC 2021 or a court order. The court applies the factors set out in the Court of Appeal's decision in Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party [2009] 1 SLR(R) 642 in deciding whether to grant an extension.
What to Include in Your Summons Application (Singapore)
A Singapore Summons Application filed under the Rules of Court 2021 (ROC 2021) must contain the following elements to comply with the procedural requirements of the Supreme Court and State Courts. The forms-legal.com Summons Application template is structured in accordance with the ROC 2021 and the Practice Directions of the Supreme Court of Singapore.
Court and case identification requires the court name (General Division of the High Court, State Courts District Court, or State Courts Magistrate's Court), the suit or case number assigned by the court registry upon filing of the originating process, and the title of the proceedings identifying all parties.
Parties to the application must identify the applicant (the party making the application) and the respondent (the party against whom the orders are sought), by reference to their designation in the proceedings (e.g., 'Plaintiff' or 'Defendant'). Where there are multiple parties, the summons should clearly identify which parties are applicants and which are respondents to the specific application.
Orders sought must set out with precision the specific orders the applicant is asking the court to make. Each order should be numbered and stated in clear, specific terms — for example, 'That the Defendant do provide discovery of all documents relating to the transaction dated [date] within 14 days of the order herein' or 'That the time for the Plaintiff to file and serve its Reply be extended to [date].' Vague or general requests for 'such further or other relief as the Court deems fit' should supplement, not replace, specific orders.
Grounds of application must state the legal and factual basis for each order sought, referencing the applicable provision of the ROC 2021, the relevant statute, or the inherent jurisdiction of the court. For example, an application for summary judgment should reference Order 9 Rule 17 of the ROC 2021 and state the grounds (no defence, no triable issue). The grounds section should be concise but complete.
Supporting affidavit is the evidentiary foundation of the summons application. Under the ROC 2021, the applicant must file and serve a supporting affidavit together with the summons, setting out the facts relied upon and exhibiting relevant documents. Affidavits must comply with the requirements of Order 12 of the ROC 2021 — including the affirmation or oath clause, the deponent's identification, and the marking and numbering of exhibits. The Singapore courts strictly enforce the Practice Direction requirements on affidavit format, including page limits and font size.
Solicitor details must state the name and address of the solicitor acting for the applicant, or confirm that the applicant acts in person (as a litigant-in-person). All solicitors filing summons applications must hold a valid practising certificate issued by the Law Society of Singapore under the Legal Profession Act 1966 (Cap. 161).
Service requirements under the ROC 2021 require the summons and supporting affidavit to be served on all parties to the proceedings. Service is effected through the electronic filing system for parties represented by solicitors, or by personal service, registered post, or other approved means for unrepresented parties. The summons must be served within the time prescribed by the ROC 2021 or as directed by the court.
Filing fees prescribed by the Rules of Court (Fees) Rules must be paid at the time of filing through the electronic filing system. Fee amounts vary by court (High Court fees are higher than State Courts fees) and by the nature of the application. Fee waiver or deferment may be available for litigants who qualify for legal aid through the Legal Aid Bureau (LAB) under the Legal Aid and Advice Act (Cap. 160).
Hearing date and time are assigned by the court registry upon filing. The Practice Directions specify the lead time for filing summons applications before the hearing date — typically at least five clear days for contested applications and shorter periods for urgent or ex parte applications. The applicant's solicitor must attend the hearing, either in person or by video conference as permitted by the court's Practice Directions. The Rules of Court 2021 (S 914/2021) and the Practice Directions of the Supreme Court of Singapore govern the core requirements for this type of document.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Summons Application (Singapore) (Singapore) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/singapore/government/court-forms/summons-application-singapore
"Summons Application (Singapore) (Singapore)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/singapore/government/court-forms/summons-application-singapore.
@misc{formslegal-summons-application-singapore,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Summons Application (Singapore) (Singapore)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/singapore/government/court-forms/summons-application-singapore}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Government Proceedings Act (Cap. 121)}
}Frequently Asked Questions
A Summons and an Originating Summons are distinct procedural instruments under the Rules of Court 2021 (ROC 2021), serving different purposes in Singapore civil litigation. An Originating Summons (OS) is an originating process — it commences new proceedings in the court. Under Order 6 of the ROC 2021, an OS is used when the primary relief sought is a declaration, the interpretation of a statute or contract, or an order in non-contentious matters where there is unlikely to be a substantial dispute of fact. Examples include applications for the construction of a will under the Wills Act (Cap. 352), applications for court approval of a scheme of arrangement under the Insolvency Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA), and applications for leave to commence derivative actions under Section 216A of the Companies Act 1967 (Cap. 50). A Summons, by contrast, is an interlocutory application made within existing proceedings that have already been commenced by a Writ of Summons, Originating Summons, or other originating process. A Summons does not start new proceedings — it asks the court to make orders within the framework of existing proceedings. Under Order 11 of the ROC 2021, a Summons is used for applications such as discovery, injunctions, summary judgment, striking out, amendment of pleadings, and extensions of time. The filing procedures differ: an OS is filed with the court registry as a new case and is assigned a new case number, while a Summons is filed within an existing case and is numbered as a sub-application within that case.
Filing fees for Summons Applications in Singapore are prescribed by the Rules of Court (Fees) Rules and vary depending on the court in which the application is filed and the nature of the application. In the General Division of the High Court, the filing fee for an interlocutory summons application is currently S$200 for a standard application heard in chambers. Applications for specific types of relief — such as applications for injunctive relief, summary judgment, or striking out — may attract higher fees. Urgent applications heard outside ordinary court hours (including applications before the Duty Judge) attract an additional fee. In the State Courts (District Court and Magistrate's Court), the filing fees are lower than the High Court fees. A standard interlocutory summons application in the State Courts attracts a filing fee prescribed by the State Courts Practice Directions. All filing fees are paid electronically at the time of filing through the Integrated Electronic Litigation System (iELS). The Singapore Academy of Law (SAL) administers the electronic filing infrastructure and publishes the current fee schedule. Litigants who cannot afford filing fees may apply for a fee waiver or deferment. The Legal Aid Bureau (LAB), established under the Legal Aid and Advice Act (Cap. 160), provides legal aid to Singapore citizens and permanent residents with limited means. LAB covers court filing fees for legally aided cases.
Yes, Singapore courts provide procedures for urgent summons applications and ex parte (without notice) applications in appropriate circumstances. Urgent applications may be made before the Duty Judge or Duty Registrar outside ordinary court sitting hours. The Supreme Court Practice Directions specify the procedure for contacting the Duty Registrar through the Supreme Court Registry and for obtaining an urgent hearing. The applicant must demonstrate genuine urgency — such as the risk of irreparable harm if the application is not heard immediately — and must explain why the application could not have been filed within ordinary court hours. Ex parte applications (without notice to the other party) are permitted for specific types of relief where giving notice would defeat the purpose of the application. The most common ex parte summons applications are: (1) Mareva injunctions (freezing orders), where notifying the defendant would risk dissipation of assets; (2) Anton Piller orders (search orders), where notifying the defendant would risk destruction of evidence; and (3) urgent injunctions to prevent imminent irreparable harm. The applicant in an ex parte application owes a duty of full and frank disclosure to the court — the applicant must disclose all material facts, including facts unfavourable to the applicant's case. Failure to make full and frank disclosure may result in the court discharging the order obtained ex parte. The Singapore Court of Appeal emphasised this duty in Tay Long Kee Impex Pte Ltd v Tan Beng Huwah [2000] 1 SLR(R) 786.
The primary form of evidence supporting a Summons Application in Singapore is the affidavit, governed by Order 12 of the Rules of Court 2021 (ROC 2021) and the Practice Directions of the Supreme Court and State Courts. The applicant must file a supporting affidavit together with or shortly after the summons, setting out the facts relied upon and exhibiting relevant documents. The affidavit must be sworn (if the deponent is a Christian) or affirmed (if the deponent is not) before a Commissioner for Oaths, a notary public, or a Singapore court officer. Affidavits sworn overseas must be made before a person authorised to administer oaths in that jurisdiction, and the affidavit must be apostilled or consularised for use in Singapore courts. The affidavit must comply with strict format requirements: it must state the deponent's full name, address, occupation, and NRIC or passport number; each paragraph must be numbered; and exhibits must be clearly marked and paginated. The Practice Directions impose page limits on affidavits (the Supreme Court Practice Directions specify a maximum page count depending on the type of application) and require 12-point Times New Roman font with 1.5 line spacing. For summary judgment applications under Order 9 Rule 17, the supporting affidavit must set out facts sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant has no defence or no triable issue. For discovery applications, the affidavit must explain the relevance and necessity of the documents sought.
The timeline for hearing a Summons Application in Singapore depends on the court, the nature of the application, the complexity of the issues, and whether the application is contested. In the General Division of the High Court, routine interlocutory applications (extensions of time, leave to amend pleadings, consent orders) are typically heard within two to four weeks of filing. Contested applications (discovery, striking out, summary judgment) are usually heard within four to eight weeks. Complex applications involving substantial affidavit evidence or legal argument may take longer, particularly if the court directs the filing of written submissions. In the State Courts, the timeline is generally similar. The State Courts operate a case management system under which the Deputy Registrar schedules applications and allocates hearing dates. Case conferences are conducted to manage the progress of litigation, and the Deputy Registrar may direct that multiple interlocutory applications be heard together to avoid delay. Urgent and ex parte applications can be heard on the same day or the next business day, depending on the urgency. The Duty Judge or Duty Registrar is available for genuinely urgent applications outside ordinary court hours. The ROC 2021 introduced a reformed case management framework emphasising efficiency and proportionality.
Yes, decisions on Summons Applications in Singapore are generally appealable, but the appeal route depends on whether the decision was made by a Registrar or a Judge, and whether the proceedings are in the High Court or State Courts. Decisions of the Registrar of the High Court (including the Senior Assistant Registrar and Assistant Registrars) on summons applications may be appealed to a Judge of the High Court sitting in chambers. The appeal is governed by Order 18 Rule 24 of the ROC 2021 and is a rehearing — the Judge may consider the matter afresh, including new evidence. The notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days of the Registrar's decision. Decisions of a Judge of the High Court on interlocutory applications may be appealed to the Appellate Division of the High Court (for interlocutory appeals) or the Court of Appeal (for certain categories of appeal), subject to the leave requirements in the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969 (Cap. 322). Under Section 29 of the SCJA, leave to appeal is required for interlocutory orders, and leave will be granted only if the appeal raises a question of general principle not yet decided, a question of importance on which further argument and a decision of the appellate court would be to the public advantage, or some other special reason. Decisions of District Judges and Magistrates in the State Courts on summons applications may be appealed to the High Court. The appeal is governed by Order 18 of the ROC 2021 and the State Courts Practice Directions.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Originating Summons (Singapore)
The commencement document for civil proceedings by originating summons in the Singapore courts under the Rules of Court 2021, used where there is no substantial dispute of fact and the court is asked to determine a legal question.
Writ of Summons (Singapore)
The primary document commencing contentious civil proceedings in the Singapore courts under the Rules of Court 2021, used where there is a substantial dispute of fact requiring pleadings and a full trial.
Statement of Claim (Singapore)
The pleading setting out the claimant's facts and cause of action in Singapore civil proceedings under the Rules of Court 2021, filed after the Writ of Summons to particularise the basis of the claim.
Defence and Counterclaim (Singapore)
The defendant's response to a Statement of Claim and any counter-claim filing in Singapore civil proceedings under the Rules of Court 2021, setting out admissions, denials, and the defendant's own claim against the claimant.
Affidavit (Singapore)
A sworn written statement of fact used in Singapore court proceedings and legal matters, executed under oath before a commissioner for oaths or advocate and solicitor. Governed by the Evidence Act 1893 and the Rules of Court 2021.