Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines)
Key facts
VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION AGAINST FORUM SHOPPING
Rule 7, Sections 4-5, Rules of Court (as amended by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC)
Republic of the Philippines
VERIFICATION
I, [Affiant Name], of legal age, [Affiant Nationality], [Capacity], with address at [Affiant Address], after being duly sworn in accordance with law, depose and state:
1. I am the [Capacity] in the above-entitled case.
2. I have caused the preparation of the [Pleading Title]; I have read the contents thereof and the same are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and/or based on authentic records.
3. I have not commenced any other action involving the same issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency, except:
CERTIFICATION AGAINST FORUM SHOPPING
Pursuant to Rule 7, Section 5 of the Rules of Court, I certify that:
b) Should I learn of any similar action or proceeding filed or pending before any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial body, I undertake to promptly inform this court within 5 days from learning of such fact.
Executed on [Execution Date] at [Execution Place], Philippines.
JURAT
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a Notary Public, this [Execution Date] at [Execution Place], by [Affiant Name], who exhibited government-issued identification.
Notary Public
Doc. No.: _____; Page No.: _____; Book No.: _____; Series of 20____.
Affiant
________________
Signature
What Is a Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines)?
A Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping in the Philippines records a sworn statement of fact made by the deponent, affirmed before an authorised officer for use as evidence.
Verification under Section 4, Rule 7 is a sworn statement by the party (not the lawyer) that: (1) the allegations in the pleading are true and correct based on the party's personal knowledge or authentic records; and (2) the pleading is not filed to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation. Verification is required for specific pleadings listed in the Rules of Court — petitions, answers to petitions, motions for reconsideration in certain courts, and other pleadings where the Rules expressly require it.
Certification Against Forum Shopping under Section 5, Rule 7 is a sworn statement by the party (the authorized officer for juridical entities) that: (1) the party has not filed or commenced any other action or proceeding involving the same issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency; (2) if there is such an action pending, the party must provide a complete statement of the present status of each pending action; and (3) if the party should thereafter learn that the same or similar action has been filed or is pending, the party undertakes to report that fact within 5 calendar days to the court.
The Supreme Court in Chua v. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. (G.R. No. 182311, August 19, 2009) held that the certification against forum shopping is a mandatory pleading requirement — failure to attach it is a ground for dismissal of the case without prejudice. The certification must be signed by the principal party, not merely by their counsel. For juridical entities (corporations, partnerships), the authorized officer must execute the certification with a Board Resolution or Secretary's Certificate authorizing them to sign.
The legal framework governing the Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) in Philippines draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Parties executing a Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) in Philippines should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386) sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines)?
A Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping in the Philippines is required for all initiatory pleadings filed before Philippine courts and quasi-judicial bodies.
A Verification and Certification is required when filing a Complaint before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC), Municipal Trial Court (MTC), or Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) in ordinary civil actions under Rule 7 of the Rules of Court (as amended by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC).
A Verification and Certification is required when filing a Petition before the Court of Appeals under Rule 42, Rule 43, Rule 45, or Rule 65 of the Rules of Court — for petitions for review, petitions for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.
A Verification and Certification is required when filing a Petition before the Supreme Court — whether a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45, a Special Civil Action under Rules 64-66, or other original actions before the Supreme Court.
A Verification and Certification is required for all initiatory pleadings before quasi-judicial bodies that adopt the Rules of Court: the NLRC (National Labor Relations Commission), the NLRC Rules of Procedure (2011) require a certification against forum shopping; the Civil Service Commission (CSC); the Office of the Ombudsman; the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG); and other agencies applying the Rules of Court.
A Verification and Certification is required for NLRC complaints and position papers under the 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure — even the complainant's position paper must be verified.
Parties in Philippines should prepare a Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines)
A complete Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping for the Philippines under Section 4 and Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court must contain the following elements.
Identification of Party: The full legal name, citizenship, and address of the party executing the verification and certification. For a juridical entity (corporation, partnership, cooperative), the authorized officer — identified by name and position — executes the certification based on a Board Resolution or Secretary's Certificate authorizing them to sign on behalf of the entity.
Verification Component (Section 4, Rule 7): A sworn statement that: (1) the party has read the pleading attached; (2) the allegations are true and correct of the party's own personal knowledge and based on authentic records; and (3) the pleading is not filed to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation. The verification must be truthful — a false verification is punishable as perjury under Article 183 of the Revised Penal Code and for indirect contempt under Rule 71 of the Rules of Court.
Certification Against Forum Shopping Component (Section 5, Rule 7): A sworn statement that: (1) the party has not commenced or filed any claim, action, or proceeding involving the same issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency; (2) if there is any other pending action, a complete statement of its present status (case number, court, parties, current stage); and (3) the party undertakes to report within 5 calendar days to the court any such subsequently learned pending or filed action.
Scope of Certification: The certification must cover the same parties, same issues, same reliefs, and same subject matter — not just the same document title. Filing multiple suits involving closely related issues in different courts to hedge bets is forum shopping even if the exact pleadings differ.
Signature and Notarization: The Verification and Certification must be signed by the principal party before a notary public under the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice — both the jurat and the acknowledgment may be used depending on the pleading type. Signing by counsel in lieu of the party is not permitted under Section 5, Rule 7, as the party has personal knowledge of forum shopping.
Consequences of False Certification: A party who files a false certification against forum shopping is subject to: contempt of court under Rule 71; dismissal of the case with prejudice under Section 5, Rule 7; and criminal prosecution for perjury under Article 183 of the Revised Penal Code (imprisonment of 2 years 4 months to 6 years).
Additional compliance elements for a Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) used in Philippines include: Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. The Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) regulates corporate entities through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) govern employment matters. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and the National Privacy Commission (NPC) protect personal data. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) administers tax obligations under the National Internal Revenue Code. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
CC BY 4.0 · free to citeReference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines
"Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines.
Forms Legal. "Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines)." Forms Legal, 2026. https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines.
@misc{formslegal-verification-and-certification-philippines,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386)}
}{{cite web |title=Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines) |website=Forms Legal |publisher=Forms Legal |date=2026 |url=https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines}}TY - ELEC T1 - Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) (Philippines) T2 - Forms Legal PB - Forms Legal PY - 2026 UR - https://forms-legal.com/philippines/personal/legal-declarations/verification-and-certification-philippines ER -
Frequently Asked Questions
Forum shopping in the Philippines is the practice of filing multiple lawsuits involving the same parties and issues in different courts or tribunals — either simultaneously or successively — in the hope of obtaining a favorable ruling from any one of them. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has repeatedly condemned forum shopping as an abuse of court processes that clogs court dockets, wastes judicial resources, and allows a litigant who receives an adverse ruling in one court to simply try their luck in another. In Venzon v. Rural Bank of Buenavista (G.R. No. 178279, April 2, 2014), the Supreme Court defined forum shopping as filing multiple suits involving the same transactions, essential facts, and circumstances with substantially the same parties, reliefs prayed for, and causes of action. Forum shopping is prohibited under Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court, and its consequences are severe: dismissal of the action with prejudice, direct contempt, and criminal liability for perjury if a false certification was filed. The certification against forum shopping requirement — mandatory under A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC and the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure — forces parties to disclose all related pending actions and to certify under oath that no other action has been filed, thereby deterring the forum shopping practice.
Failure to attach a Certification Against Forum Shopping to an initiatory pleading in the Philippines is a ground for dismissal of the case under Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court. However, the Supreme Court has distinguished between two types of non-compliance: (1) Complete absence of the certification — where no certification at all was filed — is grounds for dismissal of the case; the court may dismiss it motu proprio (on its own initiative) or upon motion of the opposing party; (2) Substantial compliance with a minor defect — where a certification was filed but contains a technical deficiency (e.g., signed by counsel instead of the party, or the authorized officer lacked a Board Resolution) — the court may allow correction of the deficiency rather than dismissing the case outright, particularly if the party was able to demonstrate good faith and compliance. The Supreme Court in Pacquing v. Coca-Cola Philippines (G.R. No. 157966, January 31, 2008) held that non-compliance with the certification requirement is not curable by amendment — the complaint may be re-filed but the original filing is deemed not to have initiated the case for prescription purposes. For NLRC complaints, the 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure similarly require a certification against forum shopping, and failure to comply renders the complaint defective.
A lawyer may sign the Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping on behalf of their client only in exceptional circumstances where the party is unable to sign. As a general rule under Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court, the certification against forum shopping must be executed by the party — the principal to the case — not by their counsel. The rationale is that the party has personal knowledge of whether they have filed similar cases elsewhere, while counsel may represent multiple clients and may not have full knowledge of all actions filed. The Supreme Court in Bernardo v. NLRC (G.R. No. 105819, March 16, 1995) held that the certification must be made by the party personally. However, exceptions apply: (1) For a juridical entity (corporation, partnership), an authorized officer — not the corporate counsel — may sign the certification based on a Board Resolution authorizing them; (2) For a party who is abroad or incapacitated, a duly authorized attorney-in-fact holding a Special Power of Attorney (SPA) that expressly grants authority to execute legal certifications may sign on the party's behalf; (3) In exceptional cases where the party is hospitalized or in a remote area, courts have allowed counsel to sign with a supporting affidavit explaining the circumstances, subject to the court's discretion. Counsel who signs without proper authority risks administrative sanctions from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) and the Supreme Court.
A Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) does not legally require a lawyer in Philippines, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386) does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified Philippines lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Philippines) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
A Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping (Philippines) does not legally require a lawyer in the Philippines, though legal advice is recommended. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contracts. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates corporate documents. The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) oversees employment agreements. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) and National Privacy Commission (NPC) impose data protection obligations. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) requires tax compliance. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point — always review with a qualified Philippine attorney for significant transactions. Under Philippines law, Civil Code of the Philippines (RA 386), parties should seek independent legal advice from a qualified lawyer to confirm compliance with all applicable requirements. Under Philippine law, the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) governs contractual obligations. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Philippines-compliant documentation.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Judicial Affidavit (Philippines)
A Judicial Affidavit for the Philippines under the Judicial Affidavit Rule (AM No. 12-8-8-SC), which replaced oral direct examination in civil, criminal, and quasi-judicial proceedings. The affiant's direct testimony is taken in question-and-answer format before a lawyer and subscribed before a notary.
NLRC Complaint Form (Philippines)
A National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) complaint form for the Philippines to file labor cases under the Labor Code (PD 442), NLRC Rules of Procedure (2011), and DOLE Department Orders. Covers illegal dismissal, money claims, unfair labor practice, and other labor disputes.
Bail Bond Application (Philippines)
A Bail Bond Application for the Philippines under Rule 114 of the Rules of Court. Used by accused persons or their surety to apply for bail — release from detention pending trial. Covers cash bail, surety bond, recognizance, and property bond under the Philippine Constitution and Revised Penal Code.