Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria)
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA
[Court Division] JUDICIAL DIVISION
SUIT NO: [Suit Number]
BETWEEN:
[Plaintiff Name] ([Plaintiff Description]) — PLAINTIFF
AND
[Defendant Name] ([Defendant Description]) — DEFENDANT
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
(Order 13, Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019)
The Plaintiff, by their solicitors [Plaintiff Lawyer], claims against the Defendant as follows:
JURISDICTION
1. This Honourable Court has jurisdiction over this matter by virtue of [Jurisdiction Basis] of Section 251 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).
FACTS
Cause of action: [Cause of Action]
[Statement of Facts]
PARTICULARS OF SPECIAL DAMAGE
[Particulars of Damage]
WHEREFORE THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS:
[Relief Claimed]
Dated this _____ day of _____________, 20____.
Filed by: [Plaintiff Lawyer]
Solicitors for the Plaintiff
Plaintiff's Solicitor
________________
Signature
What Is a Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria)?
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim in Nigeria confirms the declared information and the maker's responsibility for its accuracy.
The Federal High Court of Nigeria — established under Section 249 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) — exercises exclusive jurisdiction over federal civil matters under Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution, including revenue and tax matters (FIRS and Customs disputes), banking and financial institutions (CBN-regulated matters under BOFIA 2020), companies (CAMA 2020), admiralty, intellectual property (Copyright Act 2022; Trade Marks Act Cap T13, LFN 2004), and other federal statutory causes of action. A Statement of Claim filed in the Federal High Court must therefore carefully plead the jurisdictional basis of the claim — i.e., why the Federal High Court (and not a State High Court) has jurisdiction.
Under Order 13 Rule 4 of the FHC Rules 2019, every pleading must contain a concise statement of the facts on which the party relies and must not plead evidence. Pleadings in the Federal High Court are required to specifically plead fraud, particulars of negligence, breach of contract, or any other specific cause of action with the requisite particulars. Failure to plead material facts will preclude the plaintiff from leading evidence on those facts at trial, as the courts operate on the principle established in Fawehinmi v Nigerian Bar Association [1989] 2 NWLR (Pt 105) 558 that parties are bound by their pleadings.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim must be distinguished from a Statement of Defence (the defendant's response to the claim), a Counterclaim (the defendant's affirmative claim against the plaintiff), and a Reply (the plaintiff's answer to the defence). In the Federal High Court, pleadings are generally closed after the exchange of Statement of Claim and Statement of Defence, unless the court grants leave for further pleadings.
The legal framework governing the Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) in Nigeria draws on several key statutes and regulatory bodies. Under Nigerian law, the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA) regulates corporate entities through the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC). The Labour Act (Cap L1 LFN 2004) and the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) govern employment disputes. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) 2019 and the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) protect personal data. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) administers tax obligations under the Companies Income Tax Act. The Federal High Court and state High Courts have jurisdiction over civil matters. Parties executing a Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) in Nigeria should confirm the document reflects current law, including any amendments enacted since the original drafting date. The Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 sets the foundational requirements.
When Do You Need a Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria)?
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim in Nigeria is needed whenever a plaintiff commences contested civil proceedings by Writ of Summons in the Federal High Court and must plead the material facts supporting their claim.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is required in banking and financial disputes where a creditor sues a borrower for recovery of a loan advanced by a bank regulated under BOFIA 2020, enforcement of a bank guarantee, or recovery of bank charges unlawfully withheld — all of which fall within the Federal High Court's exclusive jurisdiction under Section 251(1)(d) of the 1999 Constitution.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is needed in admiralty proceedings — including claims for freight, demurrage, cargo damage, ship collision, or enforcement of a ship mortgage — which fall exclusively within the Federal High Court's admiralty jurisdiction under Section 251(1)(g) of the Constitution and the Admiralty Jurisdiction Act (Cap A5, LFN 2004).
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is required in intellectual property infringement actions — including claims for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act 2022, trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, or passing off — where the plaintiff seeks injunctions, damages, and delivery up of infringing goods.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is needed in company law disputes under CAMA 2020 that require a full trial — such as fraudulent misrepresentation in a share sale, breach of a shareholders' agreement, or oppression of minority shareholders under Section 344 of CAMA 2020 — where the facts are contested and oral evidence is required.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is required in revenue disputes where a taxpayer challenges a Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) assessment or enforcement action under the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA), the Value Added Tax Act (VATA), or the Finance Act 2021, following exhaustion of the Tax Appeal Tribunal process.
A Federal High Court Statement of Claim is needed when a claimant sues a federal government ministry, department, or agency (MDA) for breach of contract, wrongful termination of a public contract, or unlawful action under the Public Procurement Act 2007.
What to Include in Your Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria)
A well-drafted Federal High Court Statement of Claim under Order 13 of the FHC Rules 2019 must contain the following essential elements to found a sustainable pleading.
Case Title and Court Reference: The suit number allocated by the Federal High Court registry (inserted after filing), the names of all plaintiffs and defendants, and the division of the Federal High Court (e.g., Lagos Judicial Division, Abuja Judicial Division).
Jurisdictional Basis: An opening paragraph expressly stating the jurisdictional basis for the Federal High Court's jurisdiction over the claim — citing the specific provision of Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution or the relevant federal statute (BOFIA 2020, CAMA 2020, Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, Copyright Act 2022, etc.) that confers jurisdiction. Without a clear jurisdictional basis, the defendant may apply to strike out the claim for want of jurisdiction at any stage of the proceedings.
Parties: Full legal names, addresses, and capacity of each plaintiff and defendant. For companies, state the CAC RC number and registered address. For government bodies, state the enabling statute. Where a party sues or is sued in a representative or fiduciary capacity, the capacity must be expressly stated.
Statement of Facts: Numbered paragraphs setting out all material facts chronologically — formation of the relevant contract or relationship, the defendant's alleged breach or wrongdoing, the plaintiff's performance of obligations, and the loss or damage suffered. Each paragraph must contain only one material fact. Do not plead evidence; plead only facts.
Particulars of Special Damage: Where the plaintiff claims special (quantified) damages, a separate itemised schedule of losses must be pleaded — for example, loss of income, repair costs, medical expenses, or value of destroyed property. General damages (unquantified losses) need not be specifically pleaded.
Relief Sought (Claim Section): A numbered list of all orders and reliefs sought — declaratory reliefs, injunctions, damages (general and special), account of profits, delivery up, costs, and interest. The court may only grant reliefs specifically claimed, with limited exceptions.
Verification: Under Order 14 Rule 1 of the FHC Rules 2019, all pleadings must be signed by the plaintiff's legal practitioner. A Statement of Claim need not be sworn but must comply with the FHC Rules 2019 formatting requirements for font, margins, and numbering.
Additional compliance elements for a Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) used in Nigeria include: Under Nigerian law, the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA) regulates corporate entities through the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC). The Labour Act (Cap L1 LFN 2004) and the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) govern employment disputes. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) 2019 and the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) protect personal data. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) administers tax obligations under the Companies Income Tax Act. The Federal High Court and state High Courts have jurisdiction over civil matters. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for Nigeria-compliant documentation.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) (Nigeria) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/government/declarations/federal-high-court-statement-of-claim-nigeria
"Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) (Nigeria)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/government/declarations/federal-high-court-statement-of-claim-nigeria.
@misc{formslegal-federal-high-court-statement-of-claim-nigeria,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Federal High Court Statement of Claim (Nigeria) (Nigeria)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/nigeria/government/declarations/federal-high-court-statement-of-claim-nigeria}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019}
}Frequently Asked Questions
In the Federal High Court of Nigeria, a Statement of Claim is the pleading filed to support contested civil proceedings commenced by Writ of Summons — used where facts are disputed and the court needs to hear oral evidence from witnesses. An Originating Summons, by contrast, is an independent originating process (not a supporting pleading) used where the main issue is a pure question of law or construction of a document, without disputed facts. The Statement of Claim is supported by witness statements and documents tendered at trial; the Originating Summons is supported by a sworn affidavit. The Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 (Order 3 Rule 6) permit an Originating Summons only where the dispute is substantially one of legal interpretation. Choosing Writ of Summons (and therefore filing a Statement of Claim) is appropriate where the defendant is likely to contest the underlying facts — for example, disputing whether a contract was formed, or whether a representation was made.
Federal High Court pleadings in Nigeria are structured in accordance with Order 13 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019. The Statement of Claim should begin with a heading stating the court, division, and suit number; the names and descriptions of all parties; and the title 'Statement of Claim'. The body is drafted in consecutively numbered paragraphs, each containing one material fact. The document ends with a 'Wherefore the Plaintiff claims' section listing all reliefs sought. Each paragraph must be concise and factual, without argument or evidence. Particulars of specific claims (fraud, negligence, misrepresentation) must be separately sub-paragraphed immediately after the relevant allegation. Under Order 14 Rule 1, the pleading must be signed by the plaintiff's legal practitioner and endorsed with the practitioner's name, address, and Supreme Court number from the Legal Practitioners Act roll.
Pleadings may be amended in the Federal High Court of Nigeria with leave of court at any stage of the proceedings, subject to Order 24 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019. Before the close of pleadings, a party may amend the Statement of Claim once without leave. After the close of pleadings or after the matter has been set down for trial, leave of court is required. The court will grant leave to amend where the amendment is necessary to determine the real issues in dispute and does not cause irreparable prejudice to the opposing party that cannot be compensated by costs. The Supreme Court of Nigeria in Amata v Modebe [1998] 10 NWLR (Pt 571) 607 held that courts should lean in favour of granting amendment leave to avoid technical injustice, provided the amendment does not introduce an entirely new cause of action after the limitation period has expired.
The limitation period for commencing civil proceedings in the Federal High Court of Nigeria depends on the nature of the claim. For general contractual claims, the applicable limitation period is governed by the relevant state Limitation Law (typically 6 years from the date the cause of action arose under the Lagos State Limitation Law 2016 or the Limitation Act (Cap L16, LFN 2004) for federal matters). For admiralty claims, the Admiralty Jurisdiction Act (Cap A5, LFN 2004) and maritime conventions incorporated by reference specify shorter limitation periods — for example, 1 year for cargo claims under the Hague-Visby Rules. For revenue and tax matters before the Federal High Court, the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act specify assessment and appeal timelines. A Statement of Claim filed after the expiry of the applicable limitation period may be struck out on a defendant's preliminary objection.
Service of a Statement of Claim (attached to or following a Writ of Summons) in the Federal High Court of Nigeria is governed by Order 6 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019. Personal service on an individual defendant requires physical delivery of the process to the defendant or, for a company, to a director, manager, or company secretary at the registered office as listed with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC). Where personal service cannot be effected, the plaintiff may apply to the court for substituted service — by pasting on the defendant's last known address, publication in a national newspaper, or service by email if the court so orders. For defendants outside Nigeria, service of foreign process is governed by Order 6 Rule 12 of the FHC Rules 2019 and the applicable treaty or reciprocal enforcement regime. The plaintiff must file an affidavit of service proving that service was effected before the matter can be listed for hearing.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
General Affidavit (Nigeria)
A General Affidavit for Nigeria, a sworn written statement of facts deposed before a Commissioner for Oaths or Notary Public, admissible under the Evidence Act 2011 (Sections 107–116). Used for a wide range of personal, legal, and administrative purposes across Nigerian states and federal agencies.
Court Affidavit — Nigeria
A sworn affidavit for use in Nigerian courts, deposed before a Commissioner for Oaths or a Notary Public. Compliant with the Evidence Act 2011 (Sections 107–119) and the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019. Used for court proceedings, property transactions, name changes, and statutory declarations.
Federal High Court Originating Summons (Nigeria)
A Federal High Court Originating Summons for commencing civil proceedings in Nigeria's Federal High Court on questions of law or interpretation of statutes, contracts, or documents. Drafted in accordance with the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019, Order 3 Rule 6.