Skip to main content

Performance Review Form (New Zealand)

Performance Review Form (New Zealand)

Employment Relations Act 2000 — Good Faith Performance Management

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

[Employer Name]

NZBN: [Employer NZBN]

Review Type: [Review Type]

Date of Review: [Review Date]

Review Period: [Review Period]

REVIEW PARTIES

Employee:

Name: [Employee Name]

Job Title: [Employee Job Title]

Department: [Employee Department]

Region: [Employee Region]

Commencement Date: [Employee Start Date]

Reviewer:

Name: [Reviewer Name]

Title: [Reviewer Title]

HR Representative (if present): [HR Rep Name]

PART A — KPI AND TARGET ACHIEVEMENT

KPIs and Targets for the Review Period:

[KPI Details]

PART B — PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Rating Scale: 1 = Unsatisfactory | 2 = Below Expectations | 3 = Meets Expectations | 4 = Exceeds Expectations | 5 = Outstanding

KPI and Target Achievement: [KPI Achievement Rating]

Quality and Accuracy of Work: [Work Quality Rating]

Communication and Collaboration: [Communication Rating]

Initiative and Problem Solving: [Initiative Rating]

Leadership and Accountability: [Leadership Rating]

Attendance, Punctuality and Reliability: [Attendance Rating]

Overall Performance Rating: [Overall Rating]

Justification for Overall Rating:

[Overall Rating Justification]

PART C — ACHIEVEMENTS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

Key Achievements During the Review Period:

[Achievements Summary]

Areas Requiring Improvement:

[Areas for Improvement]

PART D — REVIEW OUTCOME

Outcome: [Review Outcome]

Date of Next Scheduled Review: [Next Review Date]

PART E — DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GOALS

Performance Goals for Next Review Period:

[Performance Goals]

Professional Development Goals:

[Development Goals]

Employer's Support Commitments:

[Support Commitments]

PART F — EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT AND COMMENTS

[Employee Self-Assessment]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NOTICE

This performance review has been conducted in accordance with the employer's performance management policy and the good faith obligations under section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000. The employee's signature below confirms that this review has been communicated to them and that they have been given an opportunity to provide comments. Signing does not necessarily constitute agreement with all assessments. If the employee wishes to formally contest any rating or comment in this review, they may do so by providing a written response within ten (10) working days of signing, which will be attached to this form and retained on the employee's personnel file.

Under section 103 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), the employee may raise a personal grievance if they believe any aspect of this review constitutes unjustified disadvantage. Any personal grievance must be raised within 90 days of the date of this review under section 114 of the ERA.

SIGNATURES

Reviewer:

Name: [Reviewer Name]

Title: [Reviewer Title]

Signature: ____________________________

Date: ____________________________

Employee:

Name: [Employee Name]

Signature: ____________________________

Date: ____________________________

HR Representative (if present):

Name: [HR Rep Name]

Signature: ____________________________

Date: ____________________________

Reviewer (Manager)

________________

Signature

Employee (Acknowledgement)

________________

Signature

Maintained by Vladislav Sergienko, Founder·Template last modified: ·Report an error

What Is a Performance Review Form (New Zealand)?

A Performance Review Form in New Zealand records a workplace conduct or performance concern and the steps taken to address it, applying the procedural fairness expected under the Employment Relations Act 2000.

New Zealand's employment law framework — primarily the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) — does not prescribe specific performance management procedures. However, the good faith obligation in section 4 of the ERA shapes every aspect of performance management. The ERA requires employers to be active and constructive in maintaining productive employment relationships, to be responsive and communicative, and not to act in a way that is misleading or deceptive. Applied to performance reviews, the good faith duty requires employers to communicate concerns clearly and specifically, give employees a genuine opportunity to provide their own assessment and respond to concerns, genuinely consider the employee's response, and communicate the outcome and the reasons for it transparently.

A properly completed performance review serves two key purposes. First, it creates a contemporaneous record of the employer's assessment of the employee's performance and the agreed goals for the next period. Second, where performance concerns are identified, it documents that the employer raised the concerns with the employee, gave a genuine opportunity to respond, and agreed an improvement plan — all of which are critical elements of a procedurally fair disciplinary process under the ERA. The Employment Relations Authority regularly considers performance review records in proceedings where employees challenge disciplinary action or dismissal as unjustified.

New Zealand's performance management framework also requires compliance with the Human Rights Act 1993. Performance ratings must be based on observable, work-related behaviours and outcomes — not on personal characteristics or protected attributes such as sex, race, disability, age, or union membership. Performance reviews that are influenced by discriminatory factors are actionable under both the Human Rights Act 1993 and the ERA.

When Do You Need a Performance Review Form (New Zealand)?

A Performance Review Form should be used by any New Zealand employer that conducts formal performance reviews of its employees. It is particularly important in the following circumstances.

First, when conducting regular performance reviews as part of the organisation's performance management cycle — whether annually, half-yearly, or quarterly. Regular reviews create a structured framework for performance feedback, goal-setting, and development planning, and demonstrate that the employer is fulfilling its good faith obligation to be active and constructive in maintaining productive employment relationships.

Second, when an employee's performance has been identified as below expectations and the employer wants to document the concerns in a structured way before initiating formal disciplinary steps. A formal performance review that records specific performance concerns, provides an opportunity for the employee to respond, and establishes a clear improvement plan is an important precursor to any formal warning letter or Performance Improvement Plan. The Employment Relations Authority will assess whether the employer gave the employee adequate notice of concerns and a genuine opportunity to improve before taking disciplinary action.

Third, when an employee is being considered for a promotion, salary increase, or expanded responsibilities. A documented performance review that records the basis for the decision — including specific evidence of outstanding performance — supports the transparency and consistency of the employer's decision-making and reduces the risk of claims of favouritism or discrimination.

Fourth, when an employee is approaching the end of a 90-day trial period under section 67A of the ERA. An end-of-trial-period review documents the employer's assessment of the employee's performance during the trial period and the basis for any decision to confirm or end the employment.

Fifth, when the employer's employment agreements or HR policies require formal performance reviews at specified intervals. Compliance with agreed performance management processes is itself part of the good faith obligation under section 4 of the ERA.

What to Include in Your Performance Review Form (New Zealand)

A compliant and effective New Zealand Performance Review Form must include the following key elements, each reflecting the good faith requirements of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) and established standards in New Zealand employment management.

The parties and review details section identifies the employer (with NZBN), the employee (with job title, department, region, and commencement date), the reviewing manager, and the type and period of the review. Clear identification of the parties and the review scope creates accountability and confirms the document is specific to the individual employee.

The KPI and target achievement section provides a structured record of the specific KPIs, targets, and objectives set at the beginning of the review period, together with the actual results achieved against each. Using quantifiable measures — dollar amounts, percentages, completion rates — promotes objective assessment and makes it possible to demonstrate clearly whether performance goals were met.

The performance ratings section provides criterion-referenced ratings across key dimensions: KPI achievement, quality of work, communication and collaboration, initiative and problem solving, leadership and accountability (where applicable), and attendance and reliability. Using a consistent 1-5 rating scale promotes comparability and fairness across the workforce. Ratings must be based on observable, work-related behaviours and outcomes to comply with the Human Rights Act 1993 and the ERA.

The achievements and improvement areas section provides written assessments of the employee's key achievements and specific, constructive areas requiring improvement. Specificity is critical — vague assessments do not give the employee a clear understanding of what they have done well or what needs to change.

The review outcome section records the outcome of the review, including whether a Performance Improvement Plan is required, and schedules the next review date. Clear outcomes give the employee a transparent understanding of where they stand.

The development plan and goals section sets specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) performance goals and professional development activities for the next review period, together with the employer's support commitments. Documenting the employer's support commitments is important evidence of good faith.

The employee self-assessment section gives the employee an opportunity to record their own reflections on the review period. This is consistent with the ERA's good faith requirement that the employer be responsive and communicative, and confirms a two-way performance dialogue.

The acknowledgement notice and signatures section provides the legal and procedural framework for the review, including notice of personal grievance rights under section 103 of the ERA, and confirms that the review was conducted, communicated, and documented. The forms-legal.com Performance Review Form (New Zealand) provides a ready-to-use template that meets New Zealand legal requirements.

Cite this page

Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:

APA

Forms Legal. (2026). Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand

MLA

"Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand.

BibTeX
@misc{formslegal-performance-review-form-new-zealand,
  author       = {{Forms Legal}},
  title        = {Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand}},
  note         = {Free legal document template. Based on Employment Relations Act 2000}
}

Also available for these jurisdictions:

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on Employment Relations Act 2000 — Template last modified June 2026Verify the source →

This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer

Found an error? Let us know