Performance Review Form (New Zealand)
Employment Relations Act 2000 — Good Faith Performance Management
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
[Employer Name]
NZBN: [Employer NZBN]
Review Type: [Review Type]
Date of Review: [Review Date]
Review Period: [Review Period]
REVIEW PARTIES
Employee:
Name: [Employee Name]
Job Title: [Employee Job Title]
Department: [Employee Department]
Region: [Employee Region]
Commencement Date: [Employee Start Date]
Reviewer:
Name: [Reviewer Name]
Title: [Reviewer Title]
HR Representative (if present): [HR Rep Name]
PART A — KPI AND TARGET ACHIEVEMENT
KPIs and Targets for the Review Period:
[KPI Details]
PART B — PERFORMANCE RATINGS
Rating Scale: 1 = Unsatisfactory | 2 = Below Expectations | 3 = Meets Expectations | 4 = Exceeds Expectations | 5 = Outstanding
KPI and Target Achievement: [KPI Achievement Rating]
Quality and Accuracy of Work: [Work Quality Rating]
Communication and Collaboration: [Communication Rating]
Initiative and Problem Solving: [Initiative Rating]
Leadership and Accountability: [Leadership Rating]
Attendance, Punctuality and Reliability: [Attendance Rating]
Overall Performance Rating: [Overall Rating]
Justification for Overall Rating:
[Overall Rating Justification]
PART C — ACHIEVEMENTS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
Key Achievements During the Review Period:
[Achievements Summary]
Areas Requiring Improvement:
[Areas for Improvement]
PART D — REVIEW OUTCOME
Outcome: [Review Outcome]
Date of Next Scheduled Review: [Next Review Date]
PART E — DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GOALS
Performance Goals for Next Review Period:
[Performance Goals]
Professional Development Goals:
[Development Goals]
Employer's Support Commitments:
[Support Commitments]
PART F — EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT AND COMMENTS
[Employee Self-Assessment]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NOTICE
This performance review has been conducted in accordance with the employer's performance management policy and the good faith obligations under section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000. The employee's signature below confirms that this review has been communicated to them and that they have been given an opportunity to provide comments. Signing does not necessarily constitute agreement with all assessments. If the employee wishes to formally contest any rating or comment in this review, they may do so by providing a written response within ten (10) working days of signing, which will be attached to this form and retained on the employee's personnel file.
Under section 103 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), the employee may raise a personal grievance if they believe any aspect of this review constitutes unjustified disadvantage. Any personal grievance must be raised within 90 days of the date of this review under section 114 of the ERA.
SIGNATURES
Reviewer:
Name: [Reviewer Name]
Title: [Reviewer Title]
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
Employee:
Name: [Employee Name]
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
HR Representative (if present):
Name: [HR Rep Name]
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
Reviewer (Manager)
________________
Signature
Employee (Acknowledgement)
________________
Signature
What Is a Performance Review Form (New Zealand)?
A Performance Review Form in New Zealand records a workplace conduct or performance concern and the steps taken to address it, applying the procedural fairness expected under the Employment Relations Act 2000.
New Zealand's employment law framework — primarily the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) — does not prescribe specific performance management procedures. However, the good faith obligation in section 4 of the ERA shapes every aspect of performance management. The ERA requires employers to be active and constructive in maintaining productive employment relationships, to be responsive and communicative, and not to act in a way that is misleading or deceptive. Applied to performance reviews, the good faith duty requires employers to communicate concerns clearly and specifically, give employees a genuine opportunity to provide their own assessment and respond to concerns, genuinely consider the employee's response, and communicate the outcome and the reasons for it transparently.
A properly completed performance review serves two key purposes. First, it creates a contemporaneous record of the employer's assessment of the employee's performance and the agreed goals for the next period. Second, where performance concerns are identified, it documents that the employer raised the concerns with the employee, gave a genuine opportunity to respond, and agreed an improvement plan — all of which are critical elements of a procedurally fair disciplinary process under the ERA. The Employment Relations Authority regularly considers performance review records in proceedings where employees challenge disciplinary action or dismissal as unjustified.
New Zealand's performance management framework also requires compliance with the Human Rights Act 1993. Performance ratings must be based on observable, work-related behaviours and outcomes — not on personal characteristics or protected attributes such as sex, race, disability, age, or union membership. Performance reviews that are influenced by discriminatory factors are actionable under both the Human Rights Act 1993 and the ERA.
When Do You Need a Performance Review Form (New Zealand)?
A Performance Review Form should be used by any New Zealand employer that conducts formal performance reviews of its employees. It is particularly important in the following circumstances.
First, when conducting regular performance reviews as part of the organisation's performance management cycle — whether annually, half-yearly, or quarterly. Regular reviews create a structured framework for performance feedback, goal-setting, and development planning, and demonstrate that the employer is fulfilling its good faith obligation to be active and constructive in maintaining productive employment relationships.
Second, when an employee's performance has been identified as below expectations and the employer wants to document the concerns in a structured way before initiating formal disciplinary steps. A formal performance review that records specific performance concerns, provides an opportunity for the employee to respond, and establishes a clear improvement plan is an important precursor to any formal warning letter or Performance Improvement Plan. The Employment Relations Authority will assess whether the employer gave the employee adequate notice of concerns and a genuine opportunity to improve before taking disciplinary action.
Third, when an employee is being considered for a promotion, salary increase, or expanded responsibilities. A documented performance review that records the basis for the decision — including specific evidence of outstanding performance — supports the transparency and consistency of the employer's decision-making and reduces the risk of claims of favouritism or discrimination.
Fourth, when an employee is approaching the end of a 90-day trial period under section 67A of the ERA. An end-of-trial-period review documents the employer's assessment of the employee's performance during the trial period and the basis for any decision to confirm or end the employment.
Fifth, when the employer's employment agreements or HR policies require formal performance reviews at specified intervals. Compliance with agreed performance management processes is itself part of the good faith obligation under section 4 of the ERA.
What to Include in Your Performance Review Form (New Zealand)
A compliant and effective New Zealand Performance Review Form must include the following key elements, each reflecting the good faith requirements of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) and established standards in New Zealand employment management.
The parties and review details section identifies the employer (with NZBN), the employee (with job title, department, region, and commencement date), the reviewing manager, and the type and period of the review. Clear identification of the parties and the review scope creates accountability and confirms the document is specific to the individual employee.
The KPI and target achievement section provides a structured record of the specific KPIs, targets, and objectives set at the beginning of the review period, together with the actual results achieved against each. Using quantifiable measures — dollar amounts, percentages, completion rates — promotes objective assessment and makes it possible to demonstrate clearly whether performance goals were met.
The performance ratings section provides criterion-referenced ratings across key dimensions: KPI achievement, quality of work, communication and collaboration, initiative and problem solving, leadership and accountability (where applicable), and attendance and reliability. Using a consistent 1-5 rating scale promotes comparability and fairness across the workforce. Ratings must be based on observable, work-related behaviours and outcomes to comply with the Human Rights Act 1993 and the ERA.
The achievements and improvement areas section provides written assessments of the employee's key achievements and specific, constructive areas requiring improvement. Specificity is critical — vague assessments do not give the employee a clear understanding of what they have done well or what needs to change.
The review outcome section records the outcome of the review, including whether a Performance Improvement Plan is required, and schedules the next review date. Clear outcomes give the employee a transparent understanding of where they stand.
The development plan and goals section sets specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) performance goals and professional development activities for the next review period, together with the employer's support commitments. Documenting the employer's support commitments is important evidence of good faith.
The employee self-assessment section gives the employee an opportunity to record their own reflections on the review period. This is consistent with the ERA's good faith requirement that the employer be responsive and communicative, and confirms a two-way performance dialogue.
The acknowledgement notice and signatures section provides the legal and procedural framework for the review, including notice of personal grievance rights under section 103 of the ERA, and confirms that the review was conducted, communicated, and documented. The forms-legal.com Performance Review Form (New Zealand) provides a ready-to-use template that meets New Zealand legal requirements.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand
"Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand.
@misc{formslegal-performance-review-form-new-zealand,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Performance Review Form (New Zealand) (New Zealand)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/new-zealand/employment/hr-forms/performance-review-form-new-zealand}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Employment Relations Act 2000}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Under section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), New Zealand employers have a duty of good faith that directly shapes performance management. The good faith duty requires employers to be active and constructive in maintaining a productive employment relationship, to be responsive and communicative, and to be transparent about matters that affect the employee's continued employment. Applied to performance reviews, this means: performance concerns must be communicated to the employee clearly and specifically; the employee must be given a genuine opportunity to respond and to provide their own assessment; the employer must genuinely consider the employee's response; and the outcome of the review must be communicated to the employee clearly with reasons. Where a performance review identifies concerns that may lead to further disciplinary action, the procedural fairness requirements are heightened — the employer must requires the employee has been given adequate notice of the concerns and a genuine opportunity to respond before any formal disciplinary action is taken.
Yes. Performance review documents are frequently produced as evidence in Employment Relations Authority (ERA) proceedings. Where an employee challenges a disciplinary action or dismissal as unjustified, the employer will typically rely on performance review records to demonstrate that the employee was aware of the performance concerns, was given the opportunity to respond, was provided with support, and had a reasonable opportunity to improve. A well-documented performance review that records specific concerns, the employee's response, agreed improvement goals, and the employer's support commitments can be powerful evidence in ERA proceedings. Conversely, the absence of documented reviews, or reviews that contain vague or unsupported assessments, may undermine an employer's position. Records should be retained on the employee's personnel file and for at least seven years from the end of employment.
Yes. All aspects of performance management, including ratings given in performance reviews, must comply with the Human Rights Act 1993 and the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA). Employers must not give lower ratings, set unachievable targets, or make adverse review decisions based on prohibited grounds of discrimination, including sex, marital status, religious belief, ethical belief, colour, race, ethnic or national origins, disability, age, political opinion, employment status, family status, or sexual orientation. Under the general protections provisions of the ERA, an employer must not take adverse action against an employee — including subjecting them to an unfair performance process — because the employee has exercised a workplace right, is a member or non-member of a union, or has a protected attribute under the Human Rights Act 1993. Ratings must be based on observable, work-related behaviours and outcomes that are relevant to the employee's role.
The Employment Relations Act 2000 does not specifically provide for a right to a support person at an ordinary performance review. However, where a performance review meeting is also a formal disciplinary meeting — or where the meeting may result in a formal warning or other disciplinary action — the good faith obligation in section 4 of the ERA requires the employer to give the employee the opportunity to have a support person (including a union representative) present. established standards in New Zealand is to offer all employees the right to have a support person present at any formal performance or disciplinary meeting. If an employee is a member of a union, the relevant collective agreement may also provide for union representation at formal performance meetings. An employer who denies a reasonable request for a support person at a meeting that involves significant employment consequences risks a finding of procedural unfairness.
Under section 67A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), employers may include a 90-day trial period in a new employee's individual employment agreement. During a valid trial period, the employer may dismiss the employee and the employee cannot raise a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal. The trial period does not, however, remove the employer's obligation to act in good faith in all other respects. An end-of-trial-period performance review is a useful tool for documenting the employer's assessment of the employee's performance during the trial period, including the basis for any decision to confirm, extend, or end the employment. If the employer decides not to confirm the employment at the end of the trial period, the performance review record provides contemporaneous documentation of the performance concerns that informed that decision. The trial period clause must have been agreed in writing before the employee commenced work to be valid.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Performance Improvement Plan (New Zealand)
Create a formal Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for New Zealand. Drafted in accordance with the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), including good faith obligations (s4 ERA), specific measurable improvement goals, employer support commitments, mid-point and final review dates, potential outcomes (including dismissal), and personal grievance rights (s103 ERA). Suitable for all performance and conduct management situations.
Employee Warning Letter (New Zealand)
Create a formal Employee Warning Letter for New Zealand. Drafted in accordance with the Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), including good faith obligations (s4 ERA), natural justice requirements, support person rights, and personal grievance provisions (s103 ERA). Covers first, second, and final written warnings for conduct, performance, attendance, and policy breaches.