Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India)
IN THE COURT OF [Court Name]
State of [Court State]
PETITION UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973
(Now Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Case No. ___ / ____
[Petitioner Name], Age [Petitioner Age] years, [Petitioner Relation], residing at [Petitioner Address] — PETITIONER
VERSUS
[Respondent Name], [Respondent Occupation], residing at [Respondent Address] — RESPONDENT
PETITION FOR MAINTENANCE
The Petitioner most respectfully submits as under:
FACTS
1. That the Petitioner, [Petitioner Name], is the [Petitioner Relation] of the Respondent [Respondent Name].
2. That the marriage between the parties was solemnised on [Marriage Date].
3. That the Respondent has sufficient means to maintain the Petitioner. The Respondent is employed as [Respondent Occupation] and earns approximately [Respondent Income] per month. The Respondent's income has not been fully disclosed.
4. That the Petitioner's income is: [Petitioner Income].
5. [Grounds Description]
6. That despite having sufficient means, the Respondent has neglected and refused to maintain the Petitioner since [Neglect Date].
7. Details of minor children: [Children Details]
PRAYER
In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to:
(a) Direct the Respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹[Maintenance Claimed] to the Petitioner under Section 125 of the CrPC, with effect from the date of this application;
(b) Pass an interim maintenance order during the pendency of this petition: [Interim Maintenance Request];
(c) Direct the Respondent to file an Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) SCC OnLine SC 1099;
(d) Pass such other and further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper.
Date: [Filing Date]
Place: [Court State]
VERIFICATION
I, [Petitioner Name], the Petitioner above-named, do hereby verify that the contents of this petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, no part of it is false, and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Verified at [Court State] on [Filing Date].
Petitioner
________________
Signature
What Is a Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India)?
A Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC in India sets out the complainant's allegations and the relief sought from the authority or forum it is addressed to.
Three categories of persons are entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. First, a wife — including a legally married wife who has been neglected or deserted, and a divorced wife who has not remarried. Second, a legitimate or illegitimate minor child (including an adopted child), and a child of majority age who is physically or mentally unable to maintain themselves. Third, a father or mother who is unable to maintain themselves. The respondent — the person against whom maintenance is claimed — must have sufficient means to pay maintenance and must have neglected or refused to maintain the petitioner.
Section 125 CrPC is expressly designed as a summary remedy to prevent destitution. The Judicial Magistrate hears the petition summarily under the criminal procedure framework and may pass an interim maintenance order under Section 125(2) relatively early in the proceedings, providing immediate financial relief while the main petition is being heard. The Supreme Court of India in Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) issued landmark guidelines standardising maintenance proceedings — including mandatory filing of an Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities by both parties, guidelines on interim maintenance quantum, and timelines for disposal of maintenance proceedings.
The landmark Supreme Court decision in Shah Bano Begum v. Mohammed Ahmed Khan (1985) established that Section 125 CrPC overrides personal law restrictions and applies to Muslim divorced women. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 and the subsequent Supreme Court interpretation in Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001) and Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015) have further refined the maintenance rights of divorced Muslim women. For Hindus, Section 125 CrPC proceedings operate concurrently with maintenance claims under Section 24 and Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 — courts prevent double recovery but allow both proceedings to continue.
Failure to comply with a maintenance order under Section 125(3) CrPC is a criminal offence. The Magistrate may issue a warrant for levying the arrears and, on failure to pay, may sentence the defaulter to imprisonment for up to one month for each month of default. This criminal enforcement mechanism makes Section 125 CrPC a uniquely effective tool compared to civil maintenance proceedings.
When Do You Need a Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India)?
A Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC is needed whenever a wife, child, or parent has been deserted, neglected, or refused financial support by the person legally obligated to maintain them, and requires a quick judicial remedy for recurring monthly maintenance.
A wife separated from her husband — whether through mutual separation, desertion, or pending divorce proceedings before the Family Court or District Court — who has no independent income or insufficient income to meet her reasonable living expenses must file a Section 125 petition before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class in the district where she resides or where the husband resides. The petition is independent of any divorce or separation proceedings and can be filed even before a divorce petition is filed.
Minor children — legitimate or illegitimate — whose father or mother has refused or neglected to pay for their maintenance, education, and healthcare, are entitled to claim maintenance through a guardian or natural parent. The Family Courts Act 1984 in many states routes Section 125 petitions through the Family Court rather than the Magistrate Court, but the substantive law remains Section 125 CrPC. School fees, medical expenses, and basic living costs are covered within the scope of maintenance for children.
Aged parents — both fathers and mothers — who are unable to maintain themselves due to old age, illness, or absence of independent income, and whose adult children (sons or daughters) have neglected or refused to pay for their maintenance, can file a Section 125 petition. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 provides a parallel and often faster administrative remedy through Maintenance Tribunals, but Section 125 CrPC remains available as a criminal summary remedy with the enforcement advantage of imprisonment for default.
Divorced women — including Hindu divorced women, Christian divorced women, Muslim divorced women, and Parsi divorced women — who have not remarried and who received inadequate or no maintenance in the divorce decree may file a fresh Section 125 petition or continue an existing one. For Muslim divorced women, the applicable framework post-Shah Bano involves both Section 125 CrPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986, with the courts applying the Danial Latifi interpretation to confirm reasonable and fair provision.
Women who have filed applications under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (PWDVA) for protection orders, residence orders, or monetary relief may simultaneously file a Section 125 petition for maintenance — the two proceedings are independent and complementary under their separate legislative frameworks.
What to Include in Your Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India)
A Maintenance Petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 must contain the following particulars to be properly presented before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or Family Court, and to establish the petitioner's entitlement to maintenance and interim maintenance.
The court heading identifies the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class (or the Family Court under the Family Courts Act 1984, as applicable) and the district jurisdiction. The petitioner's name, age, address, and relationship to the respondent (wife, child, parent) are stated in the cause title. The respondent's name, age, address, occupation, and relationship to the petitioner are stated on the opposite side.
The jurisdiction paragraph establishes that the court has jurisdiction to hear the petition — either because the petitioner resides within the court's jurisdiction or the respondent resides or last resided within the court's jurisdiction. Section 126 CrPC allows the wife to file the petition before the Magistrate in the place where she resides, even if the husband resides elsewhere.
The marriage and relationship facts section establishes the legal basis of the petitioner's claim: date of marriage (DD/MM/YYYY), place of marriage, form of marriage (Hindu customary rites, nikah, church marriage, registered civil marriage under the Special Marriage Act 1954), registration certificate reference (if any), date of separation or desertion, and the circumstances of the separation. Particulars of any children of the marriage — names, ages, and who has their custody — are recorded.
The respondent's income and financial capacity section details the evidence of the respondent's income: employment details (employer name, designation, salary per month with supporting salary slips or Form 16), business income (nature of business, turnover, income tax return references), assets owned (property, vehicles, bank accounts), and any other known sources of income. Courts in Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) directed that respondents must file an Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities — the petition should specifically request this direction.
The petitioner's needs and income section sets out the petitioner's monthly expenses: rent or accommodation costs, food, clothing, medical expenses, children's school fees, transport, and other reasonable living costs. The petitioner's own income (if any) and earning capacity are disclosed. For a wife, any prior employment or professional qualifications that affect earning capacity must be addressed.
The prayer clause requests the court to: (a) pass an order under Section 125(1) CrPC directing the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹[amount] per month to the petitioner from the date of the application; (b) pass an interim maintenance order under Section 125(2) during the pendency of the petition; (c) grant such other reliefs as the Magistrate deems fit. The interim maintenance prayer is critical — Section 125 proceedings can take months or years, and interim relief provides immediate financial support.
The affidavit in support verifies the facts stated in the petition. The Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha directed that the Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities in a prescribed format must be filed simultaneously with the petition. Documentary exhibits attached to the petition include: marriage certificate or photographs of wedding, Aadhaar card, PAN, bank statements showing the respondent's deposits, salary certificates, property documents, children's birth certificates, school fee receipts, and medical bills. The forms-legal.com Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India) template covers the mandatory elements under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India) (India) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/india/personal/family/maintenance-petition-crpc-india
"Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India) (India)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/india/personal/family/maintenance-petition-crpc-india.
@misc{formslegal-maintenance-petition-crpc-india,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India) (India)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/india/personal/family/maintenance-petition-crpc-india}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Hindu Marriage Act, 1955}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC) — now mirrored in Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS) — provides maintenance to three categories of dependants: (1) a wife, (2) a legitimate or illegitimate minor child (including a married minor daughter who is unable to maintain herself), and (3) a legitimate or illegitimate child who has attained majority but is unable to maintain itself due to any physical or mental abnormality, and (4) a father or mother who is unable to maintain themselves. The wife who can claim maintenance includes a legally married wife (regardless of religion — Section 125 is a secular provision applicable to all religions), a divorced wife who has not remarried, and in certain circumstances a wife who has been abandoned or deserted. The Supreme Court in Shah Bano Begum v. Mohammed Ahmed Khan (1985) held that a Muslim divorced woman is entitled to maintenance under Section 125, though the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 subsequently modified some aspects for Muslim women. As to the amount, the original CrPC prescribed a maximum of ₹500 per month — an absurdly low figure — but courts have consistently awarded amounts far exceeding this under the inherent power of the court and the reading of the provision in line with constitutional norms. The Supreme Court in Rajnesh v.
Maintenance in India can be claimed under two parallel frameworks: Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (a secular, summary criminal remedy) and under personal law statutes (Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, Muslim Women Act, etc.). Understanding the differences is important. Section 125 CrPC is secular and religion-neutral — it applies to all persons regardless of religion, caste, or community. It is a summary remedy designed to prevent destitution and is disposed of by the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class with relative speed. The focus is on immediate financial relief — the standard of proof is lower, and interim maintenance orders can be passed within the first few hearings. However, it is primarily a social welfare measure and the quantum may be lower than personal law entitlements. Personal law maintenance (e.g., under Section 24 or Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 for Hindus, or under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956) is adjudicated by the Civil Court or Family Court. The quantum can be higher, the proceedings are more formal, and the determination of maintenance is based on a more detailed examination of assets, liabilities, and standard of living. A wife can simultaneously claim maintenance under both — the Supreme Court has held that Section 125 CrPC proceedings are not a bar to proceedings under personal law, and vice versa.
The determination of maintenance quantum under Section 125 CrPC is a judicial exercise requiring the Magistrate to evaluate multiple factors. The Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) issued comprehensive guidelines applicable nationwide, directing all Family Courts and Magistrate Courts to follow a structured approach. Factors considered by the court include: the income of the respondent — salary slips, bank statements, income tax returns, Form 16, business records, and any evidence of undisclosed income or assets; the income and earning capacity of the petitioner — courts examine whether the petitioner is capable of self-maintenance; the standard of living enjoyed by the parties during the marriage; the financial needs of the petitioner and any children, including educational expenses, medical expenses, and rent; the reasonable expenses of the respondent for their own maintenance; and the assets and liabilities of both parties. The Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha directed that parties must file an Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities (in the prescribed format) at the outset of maintenance proceedings, and that courts may draw adverse inference if a party fails to make full disclosure. For interim maintenance (during the pendency of the petition), courts apply a prima facie assessment of the respondent's income and the petitioner's needs. Interim maintenance orders are passed relatively quickly — often within 2 to 4 hearings — and take effect from the date of the application.
Yes, a divorced wife is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, provided she has not remarried. Section 125(1) specifically includes 'a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried' within the definition of 'wife' for the purposes of the section. The right of a divorced wife to maintenance under Section 125 was the subject of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Shah Bano Begum v. Mohammed Ahmed Khan (1985), where the court held that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under Section 125. This decision was subsequently modified by the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986, which requires a Muslim divorced woman to first seek maintenance from her former husband for the iddat period and then from her relatives, before approaching the court. However, later cases — including Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001) — have interpreted the 1986 Act to ensure that the overall package of maintenance paid to a divorced Muslim woman must be adequate to sustain her throughout her life (not just the iddat period). For Hindu divorced women, the right to maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act (permanent alimony) and under Section 125 CrPC operates concurrently. The divorced wife can claim maintenance under Section 125 during the pendency of divorce proceedings and continue to receive it after the decree, until the quantum is fixed under the Hindu Marriage Act.
A Maintenance Petition under Section 125 CrPC (India) does not legally require a lawyer in India, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified India lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of India and the High Courts have jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Mutual Consent Divorce Petition (India)
A joint petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. The petition is filed jointly by both spouses before the Family Court or District Court after having lived separately for at least one year. Two court hearings are required — the first on filing and the second (motion) after a minimum 6-month cooling-off period — before the divorce decree is granted.
Domestic Violence Protection Order Application (India)
An application for a Protection Order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (DV Act). Filed before the Magistrate Court with the assistance of a Protection Officer, the application may seek protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, custody orders, and compensation. The Magistrate may also pass ex parte interim orders on the same day of application in urgent cases.
Guardianship Application for Minor (India)
A petition for appointment of a guardian of a minor's person and/or property under the Guardians and Wards Act 1890. Filed before the District Court or Family Court having jurisdiction, the application is heard and decided on the paramount criterion of the minor's welfare. The court may appoint either parent, a relative, or an institution as guardian, and may pass interim custody orders during the pendency of the petition.