Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India)
MEDICAL TREATMENT CONSENT DIRECTIVE
Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002
Patient: [Patient Name] | DOB: [Patient DOB] | Aadhaar: [Patient Aadhaar]
Blood Group: [Patient Blood Group] | Known Allergies: [Patient Allergies]
Date of this directive: [Execution Date]
1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INFORMATION
1.1 I, [Patient Name], confirm that I have received and understood adequate information from my treating physician(s) about the proposed procedures, treatments, risks, benefits, and alternatives described in this directive, and that I am making the decisions documented herein on the basis of that information.
1.2 I am an adult of sound mind, acting voluntarily without coercion, undue influence, or inducement.
2. CONSENTED TREATMENTS
2.1 I hereby give my informed consent to the following procedures and treatments: [Consented Procedures]
2.2 Anaesthetic preferences: [Preferred Anaesthesia]
3. REFUSED TREATMENTS
3.1 I hereby refuse the following procedures and treatments: [Refused Procedures]
3.2 Acknowledgment of risks: [Refusal Risks Acknowledged]. I confirm that I have been informed of and understand the medical risks arising from my refusals above, and I accept those risks.
4. MEDICATION PREFERENCES AND EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS
4.1 Medication preferences: [Medication Preferences]
4.2 Emergency instructions: [Emergency Instructions]
4.3 Healthcare proxy: [Healthcare Proxy Ref]
5. GENERAL
5.1 This directive supplements but does not replace the standard hospital consent forms of the treating institution. Where this directive conflicts with a hospital consent form, this directive (as the more specific and later-in-time expression of my preferences) shall prevail.
5.2 This directive remains valid until revoked by me in writing. I should be asked to reconfirm this directive at each hospitalisation.
Patient
________________
Signature
Treating Physician (acknowledgment)
________________
Signature
Witness
________________
Signature
What Is a Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India)?
A Medical Treatment Consent Directive in India evidences that consent has been freely given, identifying exactly what has been agreed to and by whom.
While hospitals routinely obtain consent on their own standard forms, a patient-generated Medical Treatment Consent Directive provides a more thorough and personalised record of the patient's preferences, values, and specific instructions about their care. It can address multiple potential procedures, specify conditions of refusal, document the information received, and provide guidance for healthcare providers beyond what a standard hospital consent form captures.
The Medical Treatment Consent Directive is particularly useful in contexts of chronic illness management, elective surgery planning, and for patients with strong views about specific treatments — such as Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions under any circumstances, patients who have had adverse reactions to specific anaesthetic agents, or patients undergoing high-risk procedures who wish to set limits on post-operative interventions.
The legal foundation for this document rests on several pillars. Regulation 7.14 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002 requires a physician to obtain written consent before performing any operation. The Supreme Court of India in Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda (2008) 2 SCC 1 held that valid consent requires disclosure of all material risks and alternatives. In Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court affirmed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India that every competent adult has the right to refuse medical treatment, including life-sustaining treatment.
The National Medical Commission Act 2020, which replaced the Indian Medical Council Act 1956, continues the regulatory framework for medical practice standards in India. The Consumer Protection Act 2019 provides patients with additional recourse before consumer forums where medical negligence amounts to a deficiency in service. The Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules 2011 under the Information Technology Act 2000 classify health information as sensitive personal data, requiring hospitals to maintain strict confidentiality. Forms-legal.com provides this Medical Treatment Consent Directive template as a starting point for patients and healthcare providers across India.
When Do You Need a Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India)?
You need a Medical Treatment Consent Directive when planning elective medical procedures and you wish to document your informed consent, conditions, and preferences in detail beyond what a standard hospital consent form covers. It is also needed when you wish to formally refuse specific treatments for religious, personal, or medical reasons.
The India Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) directive is essential for patients with complex medical histories who receive care from multiple providers, confirming consistent documentation of their preferences across all treating institutions. It is also important for patients whose religious or personal beliefs require specific accommodations — such as Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions, or patients who have previously had adverse reactions to specific medications or anaesthetic agents.
Keep a copy of this directive in your personal medical records, provide it to your primary treating physician, and carry a summary card identifying your key preferences.
Parties in India should prepare a Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) proactively rather than waiting for a dispute to arise. Courts interpret agreements based on the written terms rather than oral representations. Under Indian law, the Indian Contract Act 1872 governs contractual obligations, with Section 10 setting essential requirements for valid agreements. The Companies Act 2013 regulates corporate entities through the Registrar of Companies (ROC) and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). The Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and state labour commissioners govern employment disputes. The Information Technology Act 2000 and IT (Reasonable Security Practices) Rules 2011 protect personal data. The Income Tax Act 1961 and Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 govern tax obligations through the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and GST Council. Where the transaction involves regulated activities, prior approval from the relevant authority may be required before execution.
What to Include in Your Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India)
A Medical Treatment Consent Directive in India should include the following key elements to be legally effective and clinically useful.
Patient identification: Full name, date of birth, Aadhaar number, blood group, known allergies (drug and non-drug), and emergency contact details. Clear identification prevents confusion with other patients in hospital systems.
Consented treatments: A specific list of medical procedures and treatments to which the patient consents, including any special conditions or requirements — for example, consent to surgery only with a specific anaesthetic agent, or consent to chemotherapy only up to a stated number of cycles. Conditions of consent should be stated precisely so that treating physicians can act within the patient's authorised scope.
Refused treatments: Explicit identification of treatments the patient refuses, with the basis for refusal — religious (e.g., refusal of blood transfusions under Jehovah's Witness beliefs), medical (e.g., allergy or adverse reaction history), or personal preference. An acknowledgment that the patient understands the risks of refusal should be included — this directly addresses the requirement in Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda (2008) 2 SCC 1 that consent and refusal both require informed understanding.
Medication preferences: A list of medications the patient wishes to avoid, with the reason (allergy, adverse reaction, religious prohibition, or personal preference), and any preferred alternatives where known. This section is particularly important for patients with known drug sensitivities or those undergoing general anaesthesia.
Emergency treatment instructions: The patient's preferences if they are rendered unconscious or incapacitated and cannot communicate — for example, whether to attempt resuscitation, whether to administer blood products, and what level of intervention is authorised. These instructions operate as an advance consent or refusal for emergency scenarios.
Physician and hospital preferences: Preferred treating physician (name, registration number under the National Medical Commission Act 2020), and preferred hospital or healthcare facility. Where the patient has an established treating relationship with a specific physician, naming them helps confirm continuity of care.
Healthcare proxy reference: If the patient has executed a separate Advance Medical Directive under the Common Cause (2018) Supreme Court guidelines appointing a healthcare proxy or nominated representative, the reference details of that document should be included so treating physicians can identify who to contact for substitute decisions.
Information acknowledgment: A declaration that the patient has received adequate information about the consented and refused procedures — including risks, benefits, and alternatives — satisfying the informed consent standard under Regulation 7.14 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002. This acknowledgment is the patient's own record of what information was provided.
Signatures and witnessing: Patient's signature with date; signature of at least one witness who is not the treating physician; and optionally countersignature by the treating physician confirming the information provided.
Data protection: Health information is sensitive personal data under Rule 3 of the IT (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules 2011 under the Information Technology Act 2000. Hospitals and healthcare providers must maintain strict confidentiality and may not disclose the directive's contents without the patient's consent. Forms-legal.com provides this Medical Treatment Consent Directive template as a starting point for patients and healthcare providers across India.
Cite this page
Reference this free template in an article, syllabus, or research note:
Forms Legal. (2026). Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) (India) [Legal document template]. Forms Legal. https://forms-legal.com/india/estate-planning/healthcare-directives/medical-treatment-consent-directive-india
"Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) (India)." Forms Legal, 2026, https://forms-legal.com/india/estate-planning/healthcare-directives/medical-treatment-consent-directive-india.
@misc{formslegal-medical-treatment-consent-directive-india,
author = {{Forms Legal}},
title = {Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) (India)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://forms-legal.com/india/estate-planning/healthcare-directives/medical-treatment-consent-directive-india}},
note = {Free legal document template. Based on Indian Succession Act, 1925}
}Frequently Asked Questions
Informed consent is a fundamental requirement of medical practice in India, rooted in both common law principles and specific statutory and regulatory provisions. The doctrine holds that a physician must obtain the patient's consent before performing any medical procedure, and that such consent is only legally valid if the patient was provided with adequate information about the procedure, its risks, benefits, alternatives, and consequences of non-treatment. The Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002, made under the Indian Medical Council Act 1956, codify the consent requirement. Regulation 7.14 requires the physician to obtain consent in writing before performing an operation, and Regulation 7.16 requires consent in writing before any investigation or treatment. The Regulations further require that the consent be given freely and without coercion, and that it reflect the patient's understanding of the procedure. The Supreme Court of India has extensively addressed informed consent in medical negligence cases. In Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda (2008) 2 SCC 1, the Court held that 'real' or 'informed' consent requires disclosure of all material information, including the risks (even rare risks if they are significant) and alternatives.
Yes, a competent adult patient in India has a fundamental right to refuse medical treatment, including life-sustaining treatment, as a matter of personal autonomy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This right was definitively affirmed by the Supreme Court in Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India, (2018) 5 SCC 1, which held that the right to life with dignity includes the right to refuse undignified medical interventions. A patient's right to refuse treatment applies in all circumstances, provided the patient is: (a) an adult (18 years and above); (b) of sound mind and capable of understanding the nature of the decision and its consequences; and (c) making the refusal voluntarily, without coercion. The treating physician is legally bound to respect the patient's competent refusal. Performing a medical procedure on a patient who has refused it constitutes battery (unlawful touching) and may also constitute negligence. The Supreme Court in Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda (2008) made clear that a patient's consent or refusal must be the starting point of every medical intervention. A competent patient may refuse blood transfusions, chemotherapy, surgery, dialysis, CPR, mechanical ventilation, or any other treatment — even if the physician believes refusal will result in the patient's death. The physician's ethical obligation in such cases is to ensure the refusal is truly informed (that the patient understands the consequences) and to document it clearly, not to override it.
When a patient lacks the capacity to give informed consent — due to unconsciousness, severe mental illness, advanced dementia, or any other cause — Indian law provides a framework for substitute decision-making that balances the patient's best interests with respect for their previously expressed preferences. In an emergency: Section 88 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 provides protection to a medical practitioner who performs a treatment in good faith and without the patient's consent in an emergency, where the treatment is for the patient's benefit and obtaining consent was not reasonably practicable. The physician acts on the presumption that the patient would consent to treatment necessary to save life. Where an Advance Medical Directive (AMD) exists: the treating physician must consult and comply with the AMD, subject to the Medical Board review process established by the Supreme Court in Common Cause (2018). The AMD represents the patient's own advance consent or refusal and takes priority over the preferences of family members. Where a Healthcare Proxy is appointed: the proxy's consent or refusal has legal authority as the patient's authorised representative. Where neither AMD nor proxy exists: the nearest relative (spouse, adult children, or parents) is consulted. However, under Indian law, family consent is not strictly a legal substitute for patient consent — it is a practical accommodation. The physician must act in the patient's best interests and document the decision-making process.
A Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) does not legally require a lawyer in India, and individuals and businesses may draft and execute the document independently. The Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not mandate legal representation for the creation or signing of this type of document. However, seeking independent legal advice from a qualified India lawyer is recommended for transactions involving substantial financial value, complex regulatory requirements, or cross-border elements where multiple legal jurisdictions may apply. A lawyer can verify that the document complies with all applicable statutory requirements, identify potential risks specific to the transaction, and confirm that the terms adequately protect the interests of all parties involved. The Supreme Court of India has jurisdiction over disputes arising from this type of document, and Registrar of Companies (ROC) may impose additional compliance obligations depending on the nature of the underlying transaction. Professional legal review is particularly advisable where the document will be submitted to government agencies or used as evidence in legal proceedings.
A Medical Treatment Consent Directive (India) does not legally require a lawyer in India, though legal advice is recommended. Under Indian law, the Indian Contract Act 1872 governs agreements. The Companies Act 2013 and Registrar of Companies (ROC) regulate corporate documents. The Information Technology Act 2000 governs electronic contracts and data protection. The Consumer Protection Act 2019 provides consumer rights. The Income Tax Act 1961 requires tax compliance. Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point — always review with a qualified Indian advocate for significant transactions. Under India law, Indian Succession Act, 1925, parties should seek independent legal advice from a qualified lawyer to confirm compliance with all applicable requirements. Under Indian law, the Indian Contract Act 1872 governs contractual obligations, with Section 10 setting essential requirements for valid agreements. The Companies Act 2013 regulates corporate entities through the Registrar of Companies (ROC) and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). Forms-legal.com provides this template as a starting point for India-compliant documentation.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.Full disclaimer
Found an error? Let us knowRelated Documents
You may also find these documents useful:
Advance Medical Directive (India)
An Advance Medical Directive (Living Will) for India, compliant with the Supreme Court of India guidelines in Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1. Allows a person to specify treatment preferences and withhold or withdraw life support in terminal or vegetative states. Must be countersigned by a Judicial Magistrate First Class.
Healthcare Proxy (India)
A Healthcare Proxy form for India, authorising a trusted person to make medical decisions on behalf of the principal when the principal is incapacitated, consistent with the Supreme Court guidelines in Common Cause v. Union of India (2018). Appoints a healthcare agent with clear authority, limitations, and guidance on the principal's treatment preferences.
DNR Order Form (India)
A Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order Form for India, consistent with the Supreme Court guidelines in Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) and the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002. Documents a patient's or authorised proxy's instruction to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and related interventions.