An Australian Non-Compete Agreement — also called a Restraint of Trade Agreement — is a legally enforceable contract between an employer and an employee (or contractor) that restricts the employee from engaging in competitive activities after the employment relationship ends. Unlike some other jurisdictions, Australia does not have dedicated national legislation governing post-employment restraints in the private sector. Instead, they are governed by the common law restraint of trade doctrine and, where the employer is based in New South Wales, the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW). Under the common law, a restraint of trade is prima facie void as contrary to public policy. However, it will be upheld if the employer can demonstrate two things: first, that the employer has a legitimate protectable business interest (such as confidential information, trade secrets, goodwill, or established client relationships); and second, that the restraint goes no further than is reasonably necessary to protect that interest. Courts assess reasonableness by reference to the duration of the restriction, the geographic scope, and the range of activities restricted. The Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) provides an important safety net for NSW-based employment contracts. Under s 4, a restraint is valid to the extent that it is not against public policy. Unlike the strict common law approach, the Act allows NSW courts to 'read down' an overly broad restraint and enforce it to the extent that it is reasonable, rather than striking it out entirely. This makes NSW a relatively employer-friendly jurisdiction for drafting restraint clauses. When drafting an effective Australian non-compete agreement, a number of factors determine enforceability. The duration of the restriction should be proportionate to the employee's seniority and the employer's legitimate interests. Australian courts have generally upheld restraints of six to twelve months for most employees, while longer periods (up to two years) have been accepted for senior executives or where significant confidential information is involved. The geographic scope must be tailored to the employer's actual trading area — a nationwide restraint may be upheld for a senior executive of a national business but would be excessive for a local branch manager. The restricted activities must be directly related to the employer's business and the employee's role, rather than prohibiting the employee from working in any capacity. Courts will also scrutinise whether adequate consideration was provided in exchange for the restraint. Where a restraint is imposed on an existing employee (rather than at commencement of employment), additional consideration — such as a promotion, salary increase, or specific payment — is generally required to make it binding. Consideration given at the start of employment (the job itself) typically supports restraints imposed then. Common protectable interests recognised by Australian courts include confidential business information and trade secrets, established customer and client relationships, the employer's goodwill, and the product of the employer's investment in specialised training provided to the employee. This Non-Compete Agreement is suitable for a wide range of employment situations in Australia, including senior employees, sales staff, client-facing professionals, and employees with access to sensitive technical or commercial information. It should be read alongside any existing employment contract and confidentiality obligations, and adapted to the specific circumstances of the employer's business and the employee's role. Employers are encouraged to seek advice from a qualified Australian solicitor before relying on a restraint clause in legal proceedings, as enforceability is always assessed on the particular facts.

An Australian Non-Solicitation Agreement is a post-employment restraint contract that prevents a departing employee or contractor from actively approaching the employer's existing clients, customers, or other employees for a defined period after the employment relationship ends. Unlike a non-compete agreement, a non-solicitation agreement does not prevent the employee from working in the same industry or for a competitor — it simply prohibits targeted solicitation of specific people with whom the employee had an established relationship. Non-solicitation agreements are governed in Australia by the common law restraint of trade doctrine. The same reasonableness test that applies to non-compete clauses also applies to non-solicitation clauses, though courts tend to be more willing to enforce non-solicitation provisions because they are less restrictive of the employee's freedom to earn a livelihood. The employee remains free to work in the same industry and to accept clients who approach them unsolicited — they are merely prevented from actively pursuing the employer's existing relationships. In New South Wales, the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s 4 also applies to non-solicitation clauses. If a non-solicitation period is found to be longer than reasonably necessary, an NSW court may read it down to an enforceable period rather than striking out the entire clause. Employers in NSW benefit from this more flexible approach. There are two main categories of restriction in a non-solicitation agreement. A client or customer non-solicitation clause prevents the employee from approaching clients or customers of the employer, typically limited to those with whom the employee had material contact during a defined period (such as the last two years of employment). A staff non-solicitation (or non-poaching) clause prevents the employee from recruiting or inducing the employer's staff to leave. Both types of restriction must be reasonable in duration and scope to be enforceable. Australian courts assess enforceability by reference to the nature and extent of the client relationships developed during employment, the seniority of the employee, the degree of commercial sensitivity of the client relationships, and the legitimate business interest being protected. Where an employee had minimal client contact, a broad client non-solicitation clause is at greater risk of being struck down. A key practical difference between client non-solicitation and client non-dealing clauses should be noted. A pure non-solicitation clause only prevents the employee from actively approaching clients — it does not prevent the employee from accepting a client who contacts them of their own accord. A non-dealing clause goes further and prevents any business dealings with the employer's clients, regardless of who initiates contact. Non-dealing clauses are treated more like non-compete clauses and are subject to closer scrutiny by courts. To maximise enforceability, non-solicitation agreements should: identify the protected class of clients or employees with sufficient precision; specify a reasonable duration (commonly six to twelve months for most employees); be supported by adequate consideration (the role itself if agreed at commencement, or additional consideration if imposed mid-employment); and be drafted in connection with, and proportionate to, the employee's actual role and level of client contact. This Non-Solicitation Agreement is suitable for a wide range of roles in Australian businesses, including sales professionals, financial advisers, consultants, lawyers, accountants, recruiters, and any other employee who develops ongoing client relationships on behalf of the employer. It complements, and should be read alongside, any confidentiality obligations in the employment contract. Employers are encouraged to seek advice from a qualified Australian solicitor before relying on this agreement in legal proceedings.

Protect your confidential business information under Australian common law with a legally sound Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). Whether you are sharing trade secrets with a prospective partner, disclosing proprietary technology to a developer, or presenting financial projections to a potential investor, a properly drafted Australian NDA keeps your sensitive information under strict legal protection. Our template complies with Australian contract law principles and includes provisions addressing the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles.

Create a legally compliant Full-Time Employment Agreement for Australia. Drafted in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), the National Employment Standards (NES), and Superannuation Guarantee requirements. Covers position, duties, salary, superannuation at 11.5%, 38-hour week, annual leave (4 weeks), personal/carer's leave (10 days), long service leave, notice periods, probation, confidentiality, and intellectual property assignment.

An Australian Garden Leave Letter is a formal written notice issued by an employer directing an employee not to attend the workplace or perform any duties during all or part of their notice period, while continuing to receive full salary and contractual benefits. Garden leave — sometimes called 'gardening leave' — is a common mechanism used in Australia during the departure of senior, client-facing, or commercially sensitive employees to protect the employer's business interests without the uncertainty of a post-employment restraint of trade. Garden leave operates during the existing notice period rather than after it. The employee remains employed throughout the garden leave period, continues to receive their base salary, accrues annual leave and personal/carer's leave under the National Employment Standards (NES) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and remains bound by all ongoing contractual obligations including confidentiality and any post-employment restraints. Because the employee is still employed, garden leave sidesteps some of the enforceability challenges that can arise with post-employment non-compete clauses. Under the Fair Work Act 2009, an employer is entitled to direct an employee to remain away from the workplace during a notice period, provided the employee continues to receive their full contractual entitlements. The right to place an employee on garden leave should ideally be set out expressly in the employment contract. Where the contract is silent, the implied right to direct an employee's activities during employment generally supports a reasonable garden leave direction, provided the direction is not so broad as to constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade under the common law. Garden leave is particularly useful when a departing employee holds senior roles with access to current strategic plans, pricing information, client relationships, or proprietary technology. By keeping the employee off the market for the duration of their notice period, the employer reduces the risk that confidential information will be leveraged immediately by a competitor. The period also allows the employer to manage client transitions, redistribute responsibilities, and recover company property and system access in an orderly way. Common scenarios where Australian employers issue garden leave notices include resignations to join a direct competitor, departures of senior executives or relationship managers, redundancy scenarios involving highly sensitive roles, and cases where the employee has access to near-term pricing or bidding information that would be commercially damaging if shared immediately. The duration of garden leave that Australian courts will uphold is not unlimited. Courts assessing whether a garden leave direction is enforceable will consider whether it functions as an unreasonable restraint of trade. A garden leave period that is combined with a post-employment non-compete clause (so that the employee is effectively restrained for an extended total period) may be scrutinised closely. Courts may credit the garden leave period against the post-employment restraint period, or strike down the combined arrangement if it is unreasonable. This Garden Leave Letter is suitable for a wide range of Australian employment scenarios, including senior management, sales roles, finance, and technology. It should be used alongside the employee's existing employment contract and any applicable Modern Award or enterprise agreement. Employers are encouraged to seek advice from a qualified Australian solicitor or HR professional when placing senior employees on garden leave, particularly where an extended restraint period is also intended.